Category: Multimedia

Videos, Books, Presentations, Songs and ePubs

  • Paint it black – Parody

    Paint it black – Parody

    Never fail, as spring turns to summer we get questions about algal growth in water tanks. There are lots of suggested solutions, but questions about pH antagonism and phytotoxicity seem to linger. In 2021/22 we ran trials to explore how well home-grown algicides like copper, bleach, and ammonia work, and whether they cause antagonistic responses when that carrier water is used on crops. You can see the results here.

    Anticipating those results, we wrote this parody on a Stone’s classic. Not long after it was brought to life by the brilliant minds behind Michigan’s epic podcast “The Vegetable Beet” (Go subscribe right now!). You can hear it in the link below, where Ben Phillips is accompanied by his daughter’s toy tambourine. Crank it up to 11!

    You can even download Ben’s sheet music here.

    I see a white tank and I want it painted black
    No algae anymore, I want my water back
    I see the cart drive up while spraying summer rows
    I have to dump it out until the algae goes

    I see my neighbours’ tanks and they’re all painted black
    With copper sulfate they claim algae won’t come back
    I see them turn their heads and quickly look away
    They see my algae grow in sunlight every day

    I look inside the tank to see if it is black
    I could park it in the shed, or in the shade out back
    Maybe then it’ll fade away and I can face the facts
    It’s not easy filling up when your filters plug with crap

    I wish that my green sea would turn a deeper blue
    If you try chlorine pucks it will clear up for you

    I’ll store my tanks away from that bright summer sun
    Then I’ll spray algae-free before the mornin’ comes

    I see a clean tank ‘cause I had it painted black
    No algae anymore, I got my water back

    I see the cart drive up while spraying summer rows
    Clear water coming out, and no more clogging woes

    Hmm, hmm, hmm
    Hmm, hmm, hmm
    Hmm, hmm, hmm
    Hmm, hmm, hmm

    I want to see your tank painted black!
    Black as night!
    Black as coal!
    I wanna see the bugs, knocked right out of the sky
    I wanna see it painted, painted, painted black, yea!

  • Larry the Low-Drift Nozzle – Parody

    Larry the Low-Drift Nozzle – Parody

    Bridgette Readel (@BMReadel) is back! This time singing that holiday classic “Larry the Low-Drift Nozzle”! Read the lyrics and then head to the bottom of the article to enjoy Bridgette’s rendition.

    You know Flat Fan and Flood Jet and Pulse Width and Wilger,
    Hypro and Greenleaf and TeeJet and Lechler.
    But do you recall
    The most famous nozzle of all?

    Larry the low-drift nozzle
    Had a very “big-drop” spray
    And if you ever saw it
    You’d never see it drift away.

    All of the other nozzles
    Used to laugh and call him names
    They never let poor Larry
    Join them on their spray boom frames.

    Then one windy summer’s eve
    Farmer came to say
    “Larry with your spray so coarse
    Won’t you fight this gusty force?”

    Then how the neighbours loved him
    As they shouted out with glee
    “Larry the low-drift nozzle
    Stewardship for chemistry!”

  • Oh the Places You’ll Spray – Parody

    Oh the Places You’ll Spray – Parody

    Enjoy our take on a Dr. Seuss work-of-art. We’re sure the fine doctor would want to end resistant pig weed’s reign of terror as much as we do. Hear us recite it in the sound bar, read it yourself, or head to the bottom of the article to see the talented Bridgette Readel (@bmreadel) read it for you. Enjoy!

    Press Play to hear the audio version of this article

    In the home farm’s west field,
    where the soybeans won’t grow,
    and the wind blows the soil from deep tillage you know,
    and no pollinators come, excepting old crows
    is the patch of resistant pigweed.

    And downhill in the boundary, some neighbours say,
    if you look close enough you can still see today,
    where herbicide persisted,
    in the places it drifted,
    from the winds that took it away.

    How did it drift?
    How did it get there?
    And why was it lifted and taken somewhere
    from the home farm’s west field where the soybeans won’t grow?
    Look to the sprayer.
    Look close, and you’ll know.

    You won’t see Coarse nozzles.
    You will see high booms
    that wobble and bounce on a sprayer that zooms
    in headwinds too high
    in the late afternoon.
    They may even spray by the light of the moon!

    Check the chemical shed.
    Crack the door, just a fraction.
    You’re likely to see
    A lone mode of action.

    “Tell me how,” says the farmer
    “I’ll do what you say.”
    “But I only have so many hours in the day
    to spray the west field where the soybeans won’t grow,
    and battle the pigweed that simply won’t go.”

    “Oh the things you can do! So much can be done!”
    “Learn to spray in light winds, in the day, in the sun!”
    “Lower booms, use more water, use droplets so Coarse.”
    “We’ve told you before…
    (you will note we are hoarse.)”

    The farmer said nothing, just gave us a glance.
    We could tell he was thinking of time, effort and cash.
    “Driving slow improves coverage,
    and you can make up the time,
    with faster fills, longer booms, and more precise A-B lines.”

    That was long, long ago.
    Let’s check in today,
    and see if the problems have withered away.

    In the home farm’s west field,
    where the soybeans now grow,
    and cover crops cling to the soil down below,
    the pollinators buzz because drift doesn’t blow.

  • How Spot Spraying will Affect Sprayer Design

    How Spot Spraying will Affect Sprayer Design

    Some years ago, a friend recommended that I read The Tipping Point by Malcolm Gladwell. In this book, Gladwell tries to understand why some things catch on, and others don’t. It’s a compelling read full of Gladwell’s trademark stories and his knack to deftly interpret scientific studies. He talks of connectors, mavens, and salesmen, as well as the “stickiness factor”, a measure of how memorable something is, as keys to success of products and ideas. I think of the book often as I ponder the many good ideas in agriculture, many of which never see widespread adoption.

    One of these good ideas is spot spraying. Green-on-brown detection was first introduced in the early 1990s. Anyone remember the Concord DetectSpray? It was great but had bad timing, as resistance wasn’t a big issue and glyphosate prices were about to slide. Green-on-brown grew to the NTech (later Trimble) WeedSeeker a few years later. Rometron’s WEEDit built on Trimble’s success and found widespread adoption in Australia in the past ten years. Spot spraying did not gain any traction in North America during this time.

    Australia is unique in many ways, not the least of which is their summer spraying practice. Summer is the hot, dry season where land is typically fallow and weeds are kept in check with herbicide sprays (aaaah, the serenity). Making several passes over a field, combined with the need to control some larger and hardy plants, is expensive, and a spot spray saves much of the cost. The savings can be put to use with more effective herbicide tank mixes that delay the onset of herbicide resistance. Spot sprays pay for themselves in short order Down Under.

    It’s more of a challenge in the northern plains of North America, where the fallow season involves snow cover and burnoff occurs in a short window before seeding and sometimes after harvest. But nonetheless, spot sprays have a fit for many of the same reasons.

    WEEDit is the first system to make serious inroads in North America, with several dozen systems having been retrofitted to high-clearance sprayers. High detection accuracy and hardware reliability is proven in three seasons.

    On March 2, 2021, John Deere entered the Green-on-brown spot spray area with See & Spray Select. This not to be mistaken as competition. Instead, the entry of a major brand provides validation of the concept like only a large manufacturer can. Yes, we’ve reached a tipping point.

    While the first Green-on-brown units are becoming established, Green-on-green, the ability to detect weeds within a crop, continues to be developed around the world. French startup Bilberry has made enough gains in Australia to bring its product to market with Agrifac, where it’s called AIC Plus. In farmer field trials, they have achieved 90 per cent detection accuracy of wild radish in Western Australia, and claim that they are ready for broadleaf weed identification in wheat, barley and oats. Bilberry’s technology will also be seen on Australia’s Goldacres and France’s Berthoud. Other startups, notably Israel’s Greeneye Technology, plan to introduce a Green-on-green system in the U.S. in the near future. Amazone, the German farm equipment giant, partnering with Xarvio and Bosch, announced plans at Agritechnica to have a commercial unit for sale by 2021.

    This technology will have significant impact on sprayer design philosophy. At present, productivity is synonymous with capacity, and large tanks with commensurate heavy and powerful tractor units dominate. Spot spraying savings will depend on weed density and hardware resolution, but 50 per cent to 90 per cent reductions in spray volume can be expected. A 1,600-gallon tank would no longer be necessary. The savings in frame weight and horsepower would be significant, as would the time savings from less intense tendering demands. These savings would offset the lower driving speeds that accompany sensing technologies, and, overall, provide a lower bar for autonomous operation. We may see lighter specialty spot sprayers.

    The savings in brute size will be countered by increased sophistication. Better boom height management is essential for spot spraying, not just for the sensor to properly see the target and estimate the time needed for the boom to reach that spot, but also for the spot spray itself to deliver the right dose. In any fan spray, band width at ground level changes with height, and that, of course, is related to dose. Trailed booms can address this issue easily.

    But not everyone wants a specialty spot sprayer that would require an extra pass over the field. With growing utility of soil residual herbicides, dual tank sprayers—small tank for the spot spray, large tank for the broadcast residual—make sense. Large sprayer frames can accommodate an additional smaller tank, second pump, and plumbed boom easily.

    Plant detection and identification bring other opportunities. Adjusting dose for plant size is one of the first, or for harder to control weed species.

    Spot sprays rely on fast, precise response of the nozzle, and this provided by fast-reacting solenoids that are part of pulse-width modulation (PWM) systems. On a broadcast sprayer, these solenoids can change the emitted dose instantly, within a certain envelope, by altering the duty cycle of the pulse. This, however, works best in the context of a boom with overlapping spray patterns. A single band spray would not change dose with duty cycle as easily.

    Higher dosing would be an opportunity for multiple nozzle bodies that are able to spray one, two or more nozzles in the same spot simultaneously. These are already widely available and popular in Europe.

    This also brings direct injection into play. Current systems introduce the active ingredient into the boom upstream of the nozzles, affording it time to mix into the water. For true spot spray utility, though, direct injection ought to be at the nozzle. Only then can custom mixes and rates be applied on a spot basis. It’s been done before, if only to show how difficult it would be to deliver uniform doses to a spot spray machine.

    Spot spray sensors have agronomic benefits. By recording the location sprayed, weed patches can be mapped. As plant identification becomes possible, it’s conceivable to obtain plant species and stage distribution maps from the spray pass That would turn the sprayer into a high-resolution crop scouting tool. As machine learning and sensor sophistication grows, other plant and soil parameters can be mapped. The agronomic value of such maps, especially if created over the course of the growing season, is immense. Of course, data density, handling, storage, and analysis will constrain this.

    If the past has taught us anything, it’s that there seems to be a appetite for investment in farm equipment. Sprayers have been the most-used implement on the farm for some time, and their popularity continues despite sharp price increases. These new capabilities will only add value to these implements. Prepare for sticker shock, followed by acceptance and adoption.

    What will a future spot sprayer look like? Although it will have tanks and booms, the level of electronic sophistication will make it so much more versatile we can’t yet imagine all the ways in which it might be used. But it seems to me the situation has tipped and we’re already accelerating toward that future.

  • Compulsory, Standardized Sprayer Inspections

    Compulsory, Standardized Sprayer Inspections

    Spring always brings renewed interest in sprayer calibration. This is good, because a well-maintained and calibrated sprayer will protect crops more effectively and efficiently, as well as reduce the potential for off-target drift and point source contamination.

    Presently, there is no nationally-recognized standard for sprayer calibration in either Canada or the United States. As a result there are many methods, some more stringent than others, spanning activities relating to seasonal maintenance through to precise diagnostic measurements. This means an operator can be in compliance with programs such as CanadaGAP (a food safety traceability standard for fruit and vegetables), and yet only perform the most rudimentary adjustments.

    I was first made aware of “compulsory inspections” in 2009 when I started noticing certification stickers on certain European import airblast sprayers. Some Ontario tender fruit and grape growers familiar with the European standards asked why we didn’t enforce standardized calibration program as they do in Europe. I was surprised to hear a farmer ask for more paperwork, so it made me wonder, are Canada and the US overdue for a change?

    All sprayers, from large, commercial field and airblast sprayers, to the more humble home-grown sprayers (see below) benefit from regular servicing and calibration. And yet, sprayer calibration in Canada and the US remains largely voluntary and highly variable depending on the size of the operation, sprayer design and the willingness/skill of the operator.

    Canada and the US: Then

    In the mid 1980’s, University of Nebraska engineers and Successful Farming Magazine published a study showing that un-calibrated spray applications were costing US farmers ~$1,000,000,000 per year. The article was infamously called “The Billion Dollar Blunder”. You can download the original journal article describing the survey here.  It was estimated that fewer than 5% of applications were within 5% of the desired rates. Spray overlaps and poor calibration resulted in over-applications of more than 20%.

    At the time it was eye-opening and received a lot of attention. In 2006 the original study was revisited (see here), and even with advances in precision application, there was a disappointing lack of improvement. Bill Casady, University of Missouri Extension agricultural engineer, estimated that if 20 minutes of calibration can save 5% on 500 acres in an application sprayed at $25/ac ($61.75/ha), then the 20 minutes of effort worked out to $1,875 / hour. Now that’s a solid return on investment!

    Belgium: Then

    Belgium recognized and addressed this issue more than twenty years ago. In 1995, following the lead of the Netherlands and Germany, Belgium’s Ministry of Agriculture mandated that all spraying equipment (save backpacks) be inspected every three years. At the time, other countries such as Sweden, Hungary and Austria had similar, albeit voluntary, programs.

    Belgian farmers received letters asking them to make their sprayers available for testing by a Ministry-appointed institution, in locations no more than 10 kilometers from their operations. The institution’s trained technicians would subject the sprayers to a regimented, standardized inspection. When the equipment met the standard, they would receive a permit in the form of a sticker (see below) attached to the sprayer. The growers paid for this service, based in part on the size of the sprayer.

    In order to introduce the process to the Belgian farmer, a short documentary was produced. If you would rather not watch the preamble explaining why the prudent use of chemistry is critical to agriculture, and get right to the sprayer inspection process, skip ahead to 3:35.

    What follows is a brief outline of that 1995 process, which I’m told is similar to the process currently used in Belgium:

    1. Administrators perform visual checks to assess the general condition of the sprayer (e.g. obvious maintenance, safety and operational issues).
    2. Boom balance (where applicable), hinges, boom ends and boom sturdiness is checked.
    3. Nozzle spacing and orientation of nozzle bodies is inspected.
    4. All points of filtration are inspected.
    5. For boom sprayers, a spray pattern distribution used to be performed, but it wasn’t diagnostic enough. Instead, a pressure gauge / nozzle combo is used in each position to check for pressure fluctuation, and to ensure each tip had a flow rate within 5% of the average and no more than 10% deviation from the manufacturer’s rate.
    6. For airblast sprayers, the overall output of the sprayer is measured to determine nozzle wear using individual collectors clamped onto each position.
    7. For sprayers with rate controllers, calibrated collection bags are attached to a few nozzles and the sprayer drives a 100 metre course while spraying. The actual output is compared to the expected.
    8. Finally, the farmer receives a report outlining issues that need to be remedied before the sprayer is certified.

    SPISE: Today

    Today, collaborating European countries are members of SPISEStandardized Procedure for the Inspection of Sprayers in Europe. Established in 2004 by founding members from Belgium, France, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands, the SPISE Working Group aims to “further the harmonization and mutual acceptance of equipment inspections”. They also work to continually improve the inspection / calibration process.

    Their website hosts a number of sprayer-related resources, but the SPICE Advice handbooks are perhaps most valuable to the sprayer operator. Click either image below to download them as PDF for airblast or field sprayers:

    This more current video by AAMS-Salvarani goes though the inspection and adjustment process for airblast sprayers. While there is no mention of air speed adjustments, many of the steps in this video correspond with the airblast adjustments relating to Crop-Adapted Spraying which has proven very successful in Canada.

    Canada and the US: Tomorrow

    Regular, third-party mediated inspections offer many potential benefits to the average operator. But, in order to realize gains in crop protection and environmental stewardship, perhaps there are two programs required: One to certify the sprayer and the other to certify the sprayer operator.

    1. A sprayer inspection program would focus on sprayer maintenance rather than calibration. Maintenance occurs at regular intervals to ensure spray equipment is operating optimally. Calibration is an ongoing process intended to match the sprayer to the conditions in which it’s operating, and that requires an educated sprayer operator.
    2. Sprayer operator education programs such as Ontario’s Grower Pesticide Safety Course, or Penn State’s Pesticide Applicator Certification Course already exist, but they are not offered in every state or province, and they are often voluntary or perhaps specific to a particular expertise (e.g. not applying to custom applicators or airblast operators).

    They could start as voluntary, pay-for-service pilot programs to see if operators appreciate how much better their sprayers are functioning, and to quantify how much waste is been reduced. They wouldn’t necessarily have to be government-run; Industry or Academia may be better conduits. So, what would be required to develop and implement these two programs?

    • We would need to agree on a robust and generic sprayer inspection protocol. We have several European examples to draw on.
    • We would need to agree on the minimal content for a sprayer operator course. Again, we have many to draw on, with the obvious understanding that the core curriculum would be amended to reflect various state and provincial requirements.
    • We would need a trained, third-party organization to take responsibility for overseeing and implementing the two programs.
    • And, of course, we would need the funds to initiate both programs before they would eventually become self-sustaining.

    So, are we dreaming in Technicolor? If responses to this article are any indication, there are those in western society that lash out at the idea of mandatory requirements. But there are supporters, too. Maybe we can learn from those European countries that have been doing this for more than 20 years.

    Thanks to Jan Langenakens of aams for reviewing this article, and providing the videos.