Tag: spray quality

The Case for Low-Drift Sprays
This article was written by Tom Wolf for “PEI Potato News Magazine”, a publication of the Prince Edward Island Potato Board (http://peipotato.org/). It is reprinted with permission.
PEI Potato News Magazine
“Should I be using low-drift nozzles?” It seems like a simple question with an obvious answer. We all want to reduce spray drift, and this easy-to-use technology is the fastest way to get there.
And yet, the question is more complicated than it first appears. Yes, all applicators want to reduce drift, but many worry about the coarse sprays produced by low-drift nozzles. As a spray volume is divided into coarser (i.e. larger) droplets, there are fewer of them, and that can reduce coverage. It’s a legitimate concern.
Let’s start with our shared value first – the desire to reduce spray drift.
Given the economic, environmental and health impacts of spray drift, the importance is hard to over-state. That’s why spray drift management is a primary concern of our federal regulators whose job is to protect the public interest. It’s also a concern for the neighbours who have a right to keep unwanted products off their property, whether it’s residential or agricultural.
Conventional flat fan nozzles (XR8004) operating at 40 psi
Glyphosate drift with 20 km/h side wind, XR8004 40 psi
Low-drift nozzles (TD11004) operating at 60 psi
Glyphosate drift with 20 km/h side wind, TD11004 60 psi
For these reason, managing drift should be a foremost concern for applicators. The technology is vital to the crop production industry, and if we don’t take care of the issue, someone else will take care of it for us. That’s not the best path.
Much has been written about how to reduce drift. The key points are:
- choosing days with better weather,
- lowering booms and travel speeds,
- watching spray pressure,
- protecting the spray with shields,
- using coarser spray qualities on the whole.
Of these, the most economical and practical is using coarser sprays via low-drift nozzles. Engineered to emit fewer fine droplets, they are proven to reduce drift by anywhere from 50 to 95% compared to a standard flat fan of the same size. When it comes to reducing drift, they work.
When these tips first hit the mainstream as “pre-orifice” nozzles in the late 1980s, and later as “venturi” nozzles in the mid 1990s, we were impressed with their ability to reduce drift. And the obvious question was, what about product efficacy? Can fewer, larger droplets do the job? The answer, to our initial surprise, was yes.
In the late 1990s, the crop protection industry (including governments, universities, and the private sector), participated in studies throughout Europe, Australasia, and North America looking at low-drift spray performance. In Canada alone, we conducted over 100 studies and concluded that pesticide efficacy was not harmed when a properly adjusted low-drift nozzle was used. A surprising result showed that fungicides did not seem to need finer sprays, contrary to popular opinion, as long as water volumes were sufficient to provide adequate coverage.
As we did more and more studies, it became apparent which points were critical:
- When using venturi nozzles, spray pressure had to be increased from the industry standard of 40 psi to about 70 psi. This is because of a venturi nozzle’s two-stage design. The high pressure compensated for an internal pressure drop inside the nozzle. Sprays remained low-drift, but patterns and overall efficacy were better at this higher pressure.
Spray pattern of conventional spray (XR8002, 40 psi)
Spray pattern of low-drift spray (ULD12002, 60 psi)
Spray deposit of conventional spray (XR8002, 40 psi. ~10 gpa)
Spray deposit of low-drift spray (ULD12002, 60 psi, ~10 gpa)
- Spray pattern overlap needed to be greater with low-drift sprays – a full 100%. In other words, the edge of one nozzle’s spray pattern should reach the middle of the adjacent nozzles’ patterns. The pattern width at target height was now twice the nozzle spacing and this ensured good distribution of not only the spray volume, but droplet numbers, along the boom.
- We needed to pay attention to the target plant architecture and leaf surface properties. Plants such as grasses (with vertical surfaces and difficult-to-wet leaves) often had less spray retention with coarser sprays. Low-drift nozzles worked, but we couldn’t go as coarse in these cases. Careful selection of low-drift nozzles as well as more attention paid to operating pressure solved these issues.
- Our minimum water volumes had to increase slightly to compensate for the fewer drops produced by low-drift sprays. This was especially true for contact modes of action where too few droplets-per-area reduced performance. Using an Extremely Coarse spray at a very low water volume was asking for trouble.
Much of my efforts in recent years have been to advise applicators just how coarse they can safely go without harming product performance. This involves things we’ve touched on in this article, like water volumes, modes of action in the tank mix, target plant or canopy architecture, growing conditions, and the like. We’ve arrived at a few rules of thumb, like those above, but as always, it’s dangerous to oversimplify and there are always new situations to grapple with.
While we were learning how to tweak low drift nozzles to get them to perform, we also learned there were significant advantages to using coarser spray qualities.
1. Foremost, there was an immediate reduction in drift. One applicator told me years ago that switching to a low-drift spray removed a huge burden of worry from him, and that alone was worth it.
2. Low-drift sprays made it easier to spray on-time, even if weather conditions were marginal for conventional sprays. The result: the timely removal of weeds, or the correct staging of fungicides and insecticides. This has paid large dividends in terms of protected yield.
3. Coarser sprays can protect product performance from some adverse conditions, such as days with high evaporation rates. On such days, fine sprays evaporate to dryness so quickly that uptake can be limited. Larger drops stay liquid longer, with more uptake the result.
4. Directed sprays, be they banded sprays or twin fan nozzles for fungicides, make more sense from coarser nozzles. The reason is that these coarser sprays go where they’re pointed, whereas fine sprays lose their path in wind or through travel-induced deflection, very quickly.
5. We also learned about the air-entrainment that coarser sprays can produce. Large droplets dragged air with them, and smaller droplets could hitch a ride in their wake. This provided a form of air-assistance that reduced drift and carried small droplets into the canopy. Finer sprays had a harder time producing this type of drag, and sustaining it in the canopy.
When we analyzed the droplet size spectrum of coarse and fine sprays, we confirmed that the total number of droplets produced by any given volume of water had been reduced. Not a surprise. But two things struck us.
First, even though the average size of droplets in coarse sprays were very large, they still contained a population of small droplets. In fact, if you counted every single droplet in the spray, the vast majority were small and they were still taking care of coverage.
Second, the critical amount of coverage (measured as the percent of the surface area covered by spray deposits) that was necessary for a given product to work was lower than what we’d been aiming for. In other words, we didn’t need as much coverage as we thought we did, and any excess didn’t actually add to product performance in most cases.
We later analyzed the relationship between spray coverage and herbicide performance and found that the uniformity of the deposits was actually more important than the amount of coverage per se. So, if we focussed on proper overlap and spray pressure there was greater benefit than increased coverage alone. Deposit uniformity has become our research focus of late.
So, should you be using low-drift nozzles? By adopting the changes in pressure, overlap, and water volume outlined above, and paying more attention to the plant architecture and pesticide mode of action, we’ve been very successful in implementing low-drift sprays in all field crops. In my view, we can safely retire Fine sprays for all field crop pesticides. This means conventional flat fan nozzles, hollow cone nozzles, and the like. Get rid of them. All they do is add drift potential.
It’s safe to adopt low-drift sprays. Research and experience from the field prove that they work. Low-drift sprays should be viewed as an agronomic tool that improves application timing and accuracy. And with less drift, we show that agricultural practice can be both efficient and environmentally responsible. That’s going to be a very important story to tell, now and in the future.
May 20, 2016
Spray Quality and Volume Matrix
We often write about how valuable water sensitive paper can be to visualize and assess the coverage we’re getting from a specific application method. A handy reference is this matrix that combines both factors. Print it and use it in the field to compare what your application method is doing to these relative standards. On average, you will want to see deposits similar to those in the middle of the matrix.

Download US units Matrix here (pdf)

Download Metric Matrix here (pdf)

June 13, 2015
Rate Controllers and Spray Pressure
Automatic rate controllers are standard equipment on almost all new sprayers. They ensure consistent application volumes, but they don’t do all the thinking for you. We explore how to make them work properly.
A rate controller needs to know the boom width (entered by the user), the total spray liquid flow rate (from a flow meter), and the sprayer speed (gps, radar). It controls the spray liquid pressure by opening or closing a bypass valve. More pressure equals more flow to the boom.
The rate controller allows the applicator to enter a desired application volume and the controller sets the spray pressure that gives the necessary flow for the application volume and sprayer travel speed being used. In practice, this means that higher travel speeds result in higher spray pressure, and vice versa.
But it’s not that simple. Rate controllers aren’t smart enough to know how pressure affects nozzle performance. Some nozzles don’t work well at low pressures. Others do a poor job at high pressures. Some sprayer pumps may even have a problem generating some of the higher pressures a rate controller calls for. What does that mean for the available travel speed range that’s possible with any given nozzle? To answer that question, we first have to have a closer look at how pressure affects nozzle performance.
Spray Pressure and Nozzle Performance
Nozzle performance depends on a number of factors. Of these, the most critical is spray pressure. Pressure affects the flow rate of the nozzle, the spray pattern (fan angle) and the spray quality (droplet size range). The last two of these affect coverage, overlap, and spray drift, so it’s important to get them right. Each nozzle model has a unique spray pressure range and unique spray qualities within that range, so one must obtain information that is specific to the nozzles on the spray boom from the nozzle manufacturer.
ASABE spray quality for the TeeJet AIXR nozzle.
Catalogues Contain Important Information
Nozzle manufacturer catalogues identify the pressure range over which the nozzle should be operated. At low pressures, engineers look for a uniform pattern that meets the advertised fan angle. The upper pressure limits are kept low enough to prevent the formation of excessively fine sprays. Manufacturers now publish tables containing “Spray Quality”, a broad categorization of droplet size, for their various nozzles and spray pressures in their product line. Common spray qualities for agricultural nozzles are Fine (orange), Medium (yellow), Coarse (blue), Very Coarse (green), and Extremely Coarse (white). An example table from a catalogue is shown in Figure 1. Note that for any given nozzle flow rate (left column), the spray quality changes with spray pressure. For example, the TT110025 nozzle can produce a Very Coarse or a Fine spray, depending on the pressure. Also note that for any given pressure, higher flow rate nozzles produce coarser sprays. At 40 psi, the TT nozzle can produce a Medium, Coarse, or Very Coarse spray, depending on its nominal flow. Both of these relationships depend on the nozzle model and manufacturer.
Speed-Pressure-Spray Quality Relationship
As we increase spray pressure, flow rate increases with a square-root relationship.
The square root relationship between travel speed (or flow rate) and spray pressure for hydraulic nozzles
This means that in order to double the flow rate, we need to increase spray pressure by a factor of four. Figure 2 shows three different flow rate tips, each applying 10 US gpa at a range of travel speeds. Assume the operator uses a AIXR11004 to apply 10 US gpa at 12 mph. The nozzle would operate at about 40 psi, producing an Extremely Coarse spray quality. If the sprayer slows down to 7 mph to initiate a turn, spray pressure will drop to 15 psi, producing an Ultra Coarse spray. The spray pattern would likely become noticeably narrower, and poor pest control performance is likely in this situation due to the coarseness of the spray.
Relationship between travel speed and spray pressure for three nozzles applying 10 US gpa
It would have been better to use the AIXR11003 nozzle. At 12 mph, this nozzle would have operated at about 70 psi, producing a Coarse spray. Slowing down to 7 mph would drop the pressure to 25 psi, producing an Extremely Coarse spray. If the pesticide being used is sensitive to spray quality, then perhaps such slow speeds should be avoided in order to maintain a higher pressure and finer spray.
The lesson from this exercise is three-fold: (a) size the nozzle to operate at a higher pressure at your target speed to avoid dropping the pressure too low when you slow down, (b) avoid going as slow as 7 mph to prevent the pressure from dropping too low (c) compromise by setting a minimum spray pressure on the rate controller, in which case you’d over-apply product somewhat when their speed dropped too low.
Spray Pattern Overlap
Flat fan nozzle patterns need the correct overlap in order to achieve a uniform spray pattern under the boom. Research has shown that the amount of overlap for low-drift nozzles needs to be at least 100% to achieve optimum nozzle performance. In other words, the edge of a fan should reach into the centre of the adjacent fan (Figure 3), with each fan covering twice the nozzle spacing at target height. This amount of overlap assures that not only the spray volume is uniformly distributed, but that the droplet density is equally uniform. Less overlap may result in fewer droplets depositing in the overlap region, resulting in poor coverage and reduced pesticide performance.
100% overlap means that all areas under the boom receive spray from two adjacent nozzles.
Adjust the boom height so that at the lowest expected spray pressure (slowest planned travel speed), the nozzles still achieve 100% overlap. There is no disadvantage with greater than 100% overlap, but higher booms will lead to greater drift. When a choice exists, choose 110º fan angle nozzles. Most air-induced nozzles are produced at one (usually wide) fan angle only, but actual angles often differ from those advertised. It is important to visually check the overlap before spraying.
Recommendations
What does this mean in practice? Spray operators need to know the right spray quality for the job, and should consult with the pesticide product manufacturer. They also need to use nozzle manufacturers’ charts to identify the spray quality their nozzle will likely produce at their expected application volume and travel speed. If it’s a poor match, a different nozzle may need to be found. Here are some rules of thumb:
1. Choose a nozzle that produces a Coarse spray over most of the operating pressures you expect to use. Although Very Coarse sprays can work in most situations, avoid them when using lower water volumes, controlling grassy weeds, or using contact modes of action.
2. Minimize spray drift by avoiding nozzles or pressures that produce Medium or Fine spray qualities.
3. Make your pressure gauge your speedometer. First, choose a pressure that is in the middle of the nozzle’s recommended operating range. If the range is 15 to 90 psi, select 50 psi. If it’s 40 to 100 psi, select 70 psi. This allows you slow down or speed up somewhat without breaching the nozzle’s capabilities.
4. Identify the travel speeds that are possible without creating spray qualities that could compromise your application goals.
5. Visually inspect the spray pattern at the pressure extremes you expect to spray at. At the lowest pressure, your nozzle should still produce 100% overlap (the edge of the spray fan should come to the middle of the next nozzle at target height). If it doesn’t, choose a wider fan angle nozzle, increase spray pressure or elevate the boom.
6. Make sure your pump can produce the higher spray pressures you expect to need. Pressure limitations are greatest at high flow rates (fast travel speeds applying large water volumes).
7. Be prepared to compromise. It’s rarely possible to travel at the exact speed, obtain the perfect pressure, and apply the desired water volume that’s been worked out in the office or using manufacturer’s charts. If in doubt, choose slower speeds or higher water volumes to make things work out.
Nozzle manufacturers are getting much better at producing information that helps applicators produce good spraying outcomes. Learning how to use this information is the first step.
April 22, 2015
Selecting the Right Water Volume
Low water volumes can mean less effort to apply pesticides. But there is a limit to how low water volumes can go before problems appear. To understand the reasons why, and help applicators use the right volume for a given situation, we briefly outline what happens to a spray cloud as it reaches the crop canopy.
Basic Principles
To choose the right water volume, we have to remember three criteria for sprays to be effective.
- First, the spray must reach the target.
- Second, there must be enough droplets to sufficiently cover the target.
- Third, the droplets have to be in a form (size and pesticide concentration) that allows the pesticide to be efficiently taken up by the target.
Reaching the target
Let’s start with the first criteria, reaching the target. Droplet size is important for minimizing both spray drift and droplet evaporation. Small droplets move off-target easily, they also evaporate to dryness very quickly and may not have the expected performance as a result. Larger droplets clearly reduce drift, but may bounce off the target and offer less coverage per water volume.
Droplets of various sizes are actually important to cover all parts of a target, so we shouldn’t eliminate all the small ones. For example, penetration of dense broadleaf canopies, or coverage of small targets like stems is best achieved with smaller droplets, while larger droplets are useful for penetrating grassy canopies or targeting the top of a broadleaf canopy.
Target coverage
We need to get the right number of droplets to the target. The more leaf area to be covered (i.e., the taller or denser the crop canopy), the more droplets will be required. Leaf Area Index (LAI), defined as the total leaf area per unit ground area, is a good indicator of canopy density.
To put this in perspective, consider a pre-seed burnoff or an early post-emergent herbicide spray vs. a late season fungicide. In the first case, the canopy can be described as being in a single plane near ground level, with leaf areas of target plants fully exposed and with an LAI of <1. High droplet density on the leaves will be achievable with relatively low volumes.
In the second case, the canopy will have more depth, and will contain large leaf areas in each of the lower, mid, and upper canopy regions, with LAI >>1. Providing the same droplet number to each of the regions in the second case will require more droplets, and therefore more volume.
Taken as a whole, the exclusive use of finer droplets can be counterproductive due to evaporation and drift. Higher water volumes have the advantage of allowing larger average droplet sizes to be used, minimizing evaporation, drift, and enhancing deposition.
Deposit efficacy
The third criteria, maximizing the performance of specific pesticides with droplet size, is more complicated. Typically, contact modes of action and grassy or difficult-to-wet targets require somewhat finer sprays and higher water volumes (Table 1). With tank mixes, such as glyphosate and Heat or AIM, the higher water volume and finer spray criteria should be used. For any specific herbicide, use the higher volume with coarser sprays.
Table 1. Herbicide modes of action, minimum water volumes with low-drift nozzles, and maximum spray quality
In practice, an applicator rarely encounters just one type of targeting situation. Most herbicides are either broad-spectrum, or are tank mixed to target both grass and broadleaf weeds. As a result, the same spray operation has to be effective on grass weeds and broadleaf weeds, some of which may be near the top of the canopy, or be more mature, whereas others may be just emerging. In these cases, a number of different droplet sizes will be required.
Low-drift nozzles
A low-drift nozzle can be used for most applications, as long as small adjustments are made for specific conditions. Increases in pressure above 60 psi (for finer droplets, Medium to Coarse spray quality) and volume to at least 7 to 10 US gpa (for better penetration) with this nozzle optimizes performance for grassy weeds. Lower pressures (down to 40 psi, Coarse to Very Coarse spray quality) are sufficient for systemic broadleaf products or when additional drift control is necessary. Higher volumes (12 – 15 US gpa) may be needed to obtain coverage in dense canopies. Always check with nozzle manufacturer information to learn what spray quality is produced by the nozzle you’re using – this will vary with nozzle type, flow rate, and spray pressure.
Droplet sizes in sprays
All nozzles produce a wide variety of droplet sizes ranging from 5 µm to 1000 µm in diameter. The main difference between sprays is the proportion of their volume in any given size fraction, with low-drift sprays having less of their volume in the drift-prone sizes.
Size distribution (by volume) of two spray qualities. Not that both of these sprays contain small and large droplets. The difference is the volume (=dosage) in each of these size fractions. Shaded areas highlight drift-prone droplets (left) and bounce-prone droplets (right).
But even low-drift nozzles produce small droplets, and these provide sufficient coverage in most cases. Low-drift sprays do create more larger droplets, and these do not contribute to coverage due to their relatively low number and poor retention.
Our main tools for droplet size selection are spray pressure (higher pressure reduces droplet size) or nozzle choice.
Spray Pressure
Higher pressures are sometimes thought to increase canopy penetration because they force the spray into the canopy. This is not true. While higher pressures create faster moving droplets, this speed quickly diminishes. By the time the spray enters the canopy, the faster velocity is lost, especially for the smaller droplets, and the only effect that remains is the finer spray. Finer droplets will penetrate many canopies further, but only if they are protected from wind. On a windy day, the finer sprays are more likely to blow downstream, or perhaps evaporate. The main benefit of higher pressure is better operation of the nozzle, especially air-induced nozzles, leading to more uniform patterns and better overall results.
Large Droplet Advantages
Although coarser sprays are often thought to work less well, they offer certain advantages.
- One advantage is that a coarser spray tends to provide the air assist mentioned above (dragging air into the canopy, and giving smaller droplets a greater chance of moving where they’re needed).
- Larger droplets also take longer to evaporate, increasing opportunities for uptake and translocation within the plant.
- Larger droplets are more efficient at targeting the exposed, large leaves of plants requiring disease protection, leading to greater deposition and fungicide performance.
- Most importantly, coarser sprays produce less drift, enabling application under windier conditions and thus ensuring that the timing of the application with respect to the crop or disease stage can be optimized.
Water Volume
Higher water volumes are the single most effective way of increasing dense canopy penetration. Higher volumes will deliver a greater number of droplets to the lower canopy, leading to greater performance when lower canopy coverage is of importance. When used in combination with lower travel speeds, the downward air flow created by sprays can provide significant benefits in forcing the smaller droplets further down. Larger volumes also decrease sensitivity to droplet size, permitting coarser sprays that reduce spray drift.
Nozzle Angling
Research has shown that exposed (upper canopy) vertical targets such as heads or stems will benefit from an angled spray. Forward-pointed sprays offer a slight advantage over backward-pointed sprays. Since angled sprays must maintain this trajectory to be useful, it is recommended that coarser spray qualities be used to minimize fine droplet production. Angled fine droplets will quickly deflect from their initial angled path and move with prevailing winds. Low booms heights also help in maximizing the benefit of angled sprays. Canopy penetration has not been shown to be improved with forward angled sprays, but backward angled sprays can help place some spray deeper into grassy canopies.
Broadleaf vs Grassy Canopies
How can an applicator decide the most appropriate water volume and spray quality for a specific application scenario? The following guides should help.
First determine the canopy density and form (broadleaf or grassy), and the target site within it (upper, mid, or lower). If the canopy is dense, but fairly vertical (i.e., a cereal), and a significant portion of it needs to be protected, the best strategy is to apply a higher water volume using a reasonably slow ground speed to allow the spray’s built-in air assist to work. If, on the other hand, only the upper layer of leaves, or the heads, are to be targeted, slightly less water can be used. If the water volume is appropriately high for the canopy, larger droplet sizes do not significantly diminish coverage or pesticide performance.
If the canopy is dense but more horizontally oriented (broadleaf crops), similar rules apply for water volume and travel speed, but now the use of a somewhat finer spray may be of benefit. The smaller droplets will be better able to move around and through the leaves to reach deeper into the canopy. Ensuring a downward trajectory of the spray through travel speed and water volume selections will be important.
Nozzle suggestions
A very good starting point for a conventional rate-controlled sprayer is any one of the low-pressure air-induced tips that now form the majority of the market. These tips are similar enough in terms of pressure range (30 – 100 psi), spray quality (Medium-Coarse-Very Coarse, depending on pressure), and spray pattern fan angle (about 100 degrees) to have comparable performance with most pesticides. Such tips are best operated in the middle of their pressure range, which is about 50 – 70 psi, offering some room to move as travel speeds change.
For those with Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM), where most air-induced tips cannot be used, nozzle choice is more limited but growing
All these tips are described in more detail here.
April 21, 2015
Four Rules of Nozzle Selection
Nozzle choice can be overwhelming due to the large selection available from many suppliers. But nozzles are the most important part of the sprayer, being responsible for metering the liquid, atomizing it into droplets, and distributing it across the boom. Review this list for what’s available, then follow these general recommendations.
1. Choose a Coarse spray quality for a multi-purpose spray
All sprayer manufacturers voluntarily publish the spray quality of their nozzles at various flow rates and operating pressures. This information is available here from their websites, catalogues, or apps. The most popular tips for field sprayers are the air-induced and pre-orifice low-drift style, and these are typically operated between 30 and 90 psi. As a starting point, look for tips that produce a Coarse spray quality at an intermediate pressure of 60 to 70 psi. This seemingly high pressure is normal for air-induction style tips and provides some necessary travel speed range for self-propelled sprayers.
The name, symbol and colour code used to describe the spray quality produced by nozzles, according to the ASABE standard S572.2.
2. Match water volume to spray quality and crop canopy
Spray quality is a useful way to manage spray drift and coverage. The coarser your spray, the higher your water volume must be because you must have enough droplets per unit area to hit your target and provide enough droplet density on the leaves. This is most critical for pre-seed burnoff, where weeds are smallest, and where low-volume, very coarse sprays will likely miss weeds entirely. It is also important for contact herbicides (that require high droplet densities) and for grassy weeds, most of which have a hard time retaining very large droplets. Use at least 7 to 10 gpa for in-crop herbicides, 10 to 15 gpa for fungicides. The taller your crop canopy, the more leaves there are to cover and the more water is required.
Relationship between spray quality and water volume. The consequence of coarser sprays is fewer droplets per unit area. The real question is what the density threshold is for any given application.
3. Know and use the right pressure for your nozzle
Even a good nozzle won’t work well at the wrong pressure. Air-induced nozzles and some pre-orifice nozzles require higher pressures to operate properly. The most common reason for performance complaints is when the spray pressure of a low-drift nozzle is too low, resulting in poor spray distribution between nozzles (see next point). If your sprayer cannot produce sufficiently high pressures, you should not be using these nozzles. Use your spray pressure gauge as your speedometer, and aim for pressures in the middle of the nozzle’s recommended operating range. Higher pressures increase drift potential, but less so for pre-orifice and air-induced nozzles. These tables help size your nozzles for your travel speeds.
Your spray pressure is the most important measurement while spraying. It determines droplet size (and therefore drift potential and coverage) as well as fan angle, which affects overlap and pattern uniformity.
4. Ensure good patterns
Whereas finer sprays from conventional nozzles can re-distribute themselves with wind or turbulence, covering up poor patterns, the coarser droplets produced by low-drift sprays will go where they’re pointed. Therefore, there is only one chance to get uniform coverage across the boom. Before spraying, set your sprayer to your lowest expected spray pressure (say 30 psi) and your lowest expected boom height and inspect the spray pattern overlap. For low-drift sprays, try to achieve a nozzle pattern width that is twice your nozzle spacing at the target height. If necessary, adjust your boom height, increase pressure, or select wider angle nozzles. This will ensure that the coarsest droplets at the pattern edge are mixed in with the more abundant, finer droplets found in the middle of a pattern.
March 7, 2015