Category: Boom Sprayers

Main category for sprayers with horizontal booms

  • John Deere See & Spray Select

    John Deere See & Spray Select

    On March 2, 2021, John Deere entered the optical spot spray (OSS) market with its first product, See & Spray Select™. This “Green on Brown” system identifies green material on a non-green background and is thus suited for pre-seed burnoff, chem fallow, or post harvest. It is competing for the same market space as Cropland’s WEEDit and Trimble’s WeedSeeker, but uses a slightly different approach.

    At the heart of the See & Spray system is a relatively simple RGB camera that is mounted directly to the boom and looks about 1.5 m ahead.  When this camera detects a spot of green colour, it assumes that this is a plant and activates a nozzle in line with that plant. John Deere says the weed size threshold is about ¼” (6 mm), and is evaluating its experimental data to identify exceptions to that rule of thumb.

    See & Spray Select uses an RGB camera to detect weeds (Image courtesy John Deere)

    In 2017, John Deere conducted a highly publicized acquisition of Blue River Technologies, a start up that pioneered artificial intelligence (AI) plant identification and coined the term “See & Spray”. However, the technology John Deere announced this time originated with the University of Southern Queensland near Toowoomba, Australia. The university’s Centre for Agricultural Engineering had received some initial seed financing from Sugar Research Australia, Cotton Research and Development Corporation, and Hort Innovation, and eventually partnered with John Deere. This is yet another example of the value of farmer investments in research.

    Blue River contributed to this project but remains committed to its path of developing Green on Green OSS through machine learning. John Deere says this first product is part of an evolution of spraying with ever-increasing precision that will culminate in spot spraying weeds within a canopy.

    The pixels in the See & Spray camera chip are mapped during its initial calibration, allowing the processor to know which nozzle to turn on. There are two user-selected modes. In “Single Nozzle” Mode, the system turns on as few nozzles as possible. If the weed is directly under a nozzle, just that nozzle is turned on. Should the weed be in between two nozzles, both will be turned on. In “Overlapping” Mode, a detection will turn on at least three, and up to six adjacent nozzles. This mode is intended for herbicides that contain specific nozzle recommendations on the label, such as dicamba. By fitting these tips on the spot spray location, the required overlap and subsequent coverage can be guaranteed to be compliant with that label, a unique feature of See & Spray.

    The number of nozzles activated by a weed detection depends on the location of the weed relative to the nozzles, and the mode selected by the user (Image courtesy John Deere)

    In all modes, the user can specify the distance before and after the detected plant that the nozzle will spray. This feature is useful when boom height varies or when travelling faster to provide extra assurance that the target will be covered by the spray. The boom height range for See & Spray is 26 to 47” (66 to 120 cm), and the maximum travel speed with nozzles pointed down is 12 mph.

    Installation of a 40 degree angled adaptor allows sprays tom be emitted backwards, and increases the spray speeds to 16 mph due to the extra distance and time afforded the sensors andoin processors to make a decision.

    See & Spray has a built in contingency for suboptimal conditions, for example when the boom falls outside its height range, or the nozzle speed (not tractor) exceeds the 12 or 16 mph maximum in a turn, or a light or sensor or processor fault occurs. Called “Fallback Mode”, the boom can be configured to shut off, or to go into broadcast mode (using the spot spray nozzles) at that time. These types of insurance are a necessary part of an OSS on the market today.

    To prevent fallback mode from occuring unecessarily, operators often choose to reduce their tractor speed one or two mph to allow for yaw without triggering all the nozzles.

    No OSS system is perfect. Tiny weeds, or those obscured from camera view by crop residue, may be missed. The contingency for WEEDit is “Combined Mode”, where the entire boom emits a broadcast spray at a user-determined fraction of the full dose, while still maintaining spot spray capability at the full dose when a detection occurs. The reduced dose is sufficient to control the smallest weeds, whereas the spot spray is emitted at the full label rate for the larger ones. This capability is made possible through Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) control of each nozzle.

    John Deere has developed a mode of its ExactApply system to create the same outcome. Called “A & B Mode”, the rear nozzle (B location on the ExactApply nozzle body) is being activated by See & Spray. The front nozzle (A location) can be asked to spray simultaneously over the entire boom width. By choosing a smaller nozzle, a fraction of the label rate can be applied as a broadcast while maintaining spot spray capability. The broadcast boom is pulse-width modulated and retains the swath control and turn compensation of ExactApply. This mode also makes it easier to ensure coverage of these smaller weeds by selecting a finer, wider (110 degree) angles spray on the broadcast boom, and retaining a coarser, narrower fan angle banding nozzle for the spot application. The spot spray does not use PWM, relying on conventional speed and pressure to ensure the correct rate.

    If planning to use A & B Mode, a user would first need to decide if they will calculate the spot spray dosing on a single or a multiple activated nozzle system. If priorizing the single nozzle actiation, one would first determine the band width of that nozzle, and size the nozzle accordingly. The band width should be ar close to the nozzle spacing as possible to maximize savings. Say the sprayer has 15″ spacing, and the nozzle’s band width is 20″. Now, whenever multiple nozzles are activated, they would operate as a 15″ spacing and would over-apply 20/15 = 1.33, or 33%. Say you want to apply 15 gpa (you may need to boost the spot spray volume to allow you to cut that with the broadcast feature). You can do it with the band (and overdose when using multiple nozzles, or apply 15 gpa with the multiple nozzles, underdosing by 28% when a single nozzle is activated. Or split the difference.

    The next step is to select the application rate of the broadcast. If you want to apply 30% of the spot spray rate using the broadcast nozzles, size these accrodingly to apply 5 gpa.

    For band- and spot-sprays, the width of the spray pattern at the target height determines the dose, therefore careful selection is advised. A worksheet that shows boom heights at various fan angles and nozzle spacings is downloadable here. TeeJet and Hypro offer a selection of narrower flat fan tips, but none yet in a low-drift design. Other nozzles are in development. Agrotop has already developed a low-drift “Spot Fan”, and MagnoJet, a Brazilian ceramic nozzle supplier, has 30 and 40 degree low drift tips for sale. Wilger has develped the DX series ComboJet tips in 20, 40, and 60 degree fan angles, in a low drift (pre-orifice design that works with PWM.

    The camera sensing threshold can be adjusted to optimize a specific target. For example, to specify a certain weed size, that weed can be held in view of the sensor and the user can adjust the sensitivity until the weed is properly detected. As with any higher sensitivity, this runs the risk of more false detections, resulting in over-application. But it gives the user some knowledge that an important weed stage is being targeted properly.

    The See & Spray camera relies on ambient light conditions, and John Deere recommends it not be used within 30 minutes of dawn or dusk. Both WEEDit and WeedSeeker, in contrast, can operate under any light conditions.

    One of the challenges of running a OSS boom is the unpredictable fluctuation in flow requirement, which can theoretically range from just a few nozzles spraying to the whole boom activated in less than one second. While this extreme example is rare, a sophisticated and fast-responding pressure-based flow capability is nonetheless required. WEEDit uses a Ramsay Valve into their units to handle this challenge, whereas John Deere is relying on its existing plumbing design.

    As a factory install, the See & Spray is fully integrated into the Series 4 display and is tied into JD Link. As a result, it can generate a high resolution map that shows each spot spray activation, by nozzle. The agronomic utility of this capability is significant, as it provides a very high resolution plant density map. This capability is also inherent in WEEDit and most green on Green systems available..

    See & Spray Select is a factory option and comes integrated into the 4600 series monitor (Image courtesy John Deere)

    It’s no secret that I believe optical spot sprays represent the future of pesticide application (see here). And it’s great news to see John Deere enter the OSS area with a factory installed option. As an influential force in ag, it lends credence to the concept and will benefit all other companies vying for this space. As they say, a rising tide raises all ships.

  • Compulsory, Standardized Sprayer Inspections

    Compulsory, Standardized Sprayer Inspections

    Spring always brings renewed interest in sprayer calibration. This is good, because a well-maintained and calibrated sprayer will protect crops more effectively and efficiently, as well as reduce the potential for off-target drift and point source contamination.

    Presently, there is no nationally-recognized standard for sprayer calibration in either Canada or the United States. As a result there are many methods, some more stringent than others, spanning activities relating to seasonal maintenance through to precise diagnostic measurements. This means an operator can be in compliance with programs such as CanadaGAP (a food safety traceability standard for fruit and vegetables), and yet only perform the most rudimentary adjustments.

    I was first made aware of “compulsory inspections” in 2009 when I started noticing certification stickers on certain European import airblast sprayers. Some Ontario tender fruit and grape growers familiar with the European standards asked why we didn’t enforce standardized calibration program as they do in Europe. I was surprised to hear a farmer ask for more paperwork, so it made me wonder, are Canada and the US overdue for a change?

    All sprayers, from large, commercial field and airblast sprayers, to the more humble home-grown sprayers (see below) benefit from regular servicing and calibration. And yet, sprayer calibration in Canada and the US remains largely voluntary and highly variable depending on the size of the operation, sprayer design and the willingness/skill of the operator.

    Canada and the US: Then

    In the mid 1980’s, University of Nebraska engineers and Successful Farming Magazine published a study showing that un-calibrated spray applications were costing US farmers ~$1,000,000,000 per year. The article was infamously called “The Billion Dollar Blunder”. You can download the original journal article describing the survey here.  It was estimated that fewer than 5% of applications were within 5% of the desired rates. Spray overlaps and poor calibration resulted in over-applications of more than 20%.

    At the time it was eye-opening and received a lot of attention. In 2006 the original study was revisited (see here), and even with advances in precision application, there was a disappointing lack of improvement. Bill Casady, University of Missouri Extension agricultural engineer, estimated that if 20 minutes of calibration can save 5% on 500 acres in an application sprayed at $25/ac ($61.75/ha), then the 20 minutes of effort worked out to $1,875 / hour. Now that’s a solid return on investment!

    Belgium: Then

    Belgium recognized and addressed this issue more than twenty years ago. In 1995, following the lead of the Netherlands and Germany, Belgium’s Ministry of Agriculture mandated that all spraying equipment (save backpacks) be inspected every three years. At the time, other countries such as Sweden, Hungary and Austria had similar, albeit voluntary, programs.

    Belgian farmers received letters asking them to make their sprayers available for testing by a Ministry-appointed institution, in locations no more than 10 kilometers from their operations. The institution’s trained technicians would subject the sprayers to a regimented, standardized inspection. When the equipment met the standard, they would receive a permit in the form of a sticker (see below) attached to the sprayer. The growers paid for this service, based in part on the size of the sprayer.

    In order to introduce the process to the Belgian farmer, a short documentary was produced. If you would rather not watch the preamble explaining why the prudent use of chemistry is critical to agriculture, and get right to the sprayer inspection process, skip ahead to 3:35.

    What follows is a brief outline of that 1995 process, which I’m told is similar to the process currently used in Belgium:

    1. Administrators perform visual checks to assess the general condition of the sprayer (e.g. obvious maintenance, safety and operational issues).
    2. Boom balance (where applicable), hinges, boom ends and boom sturdiness is checked.
    3. Nozzle spacing and orientation of nozzle bodies is inspected.
    4. All points of filtration are inspected.
    5. For boom sprayers, a spray pattern distribution used to be performed, but it wasn’t diagnostic enough. Instead, a pressure gauge / nozzle combo is used in each position to check for pressure fluctuation, and to ensure each tip had a flow rate within 5% of the average and no more than 10% deviation from the manufacturer’s rate.
    6. For airblast sprayers, the overall output of the sprayer is measured to determine nozzle wear using individual collectors clamped onto each position.
    7. For sprayers with rate controllers, calibrated collection bags are attached to a few nozzles and the sprayer drives a 100 metre course while spraying. The actual output is compared to the expected.
    8. Finally, the farmer receives a report outlining issues that need to be remedied before the sprayer is certified.

    SPISE: Today

    Today, collaborating European countries are members of SPISE – Standardized Procedure for the Inspection of Sprayers in Europe. Established in 2004 by founding members from Belgium, France, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands, the SPISE Working Group aims to “further the harmonization and mutual acceptance of equipment inspections”. They also work to continually improve the inspection / calibration process.

    Their website hosts a number of sprayer-related resources, but the SPICE Advice handbooks are perhaps most valuable to the sprayer operator. Click either image below to download them as PDF for airblast or field sprayers:

    This more current video by AAMS-Salvarani goes though the inspection and adjustment process for airblast sprayers. While there is no mention of air speed adjustments, many of the steps in this video correspond with the airblast adjustments relating to Crop-Adapted Spraying which has proven very successful in Canada.

    Canada and the US: Tomorrow

    Regular, third-party mediated inspections offer many potential benefits to the average operator. But, in order to realize gains in crop protection and environmental stewardship, perhaps there are two programs required: One to certify the sprayer and the other to certify the sprayer operator.

    1. A sprayer inspection program would focus on sprayer maintenance rather than calibration. Maintenance occurs at regular intervals to ensure spray equipment is operating optimally. Calibration is an ongoing process intended to match the sprayer to the conditions in which it’s operating, and that requires an educated sprayer operator.
    2. Sprayer operator education programs such as Ontario’s Grower Pesticide Safety Course, or Penn State’s Pesticide Applicator Certification Course already exist, but they are not offered in every state or province, and they are often voluntary or perhaps specific to a particular expertise (e.g. not applying to custom applicators or airblast operators).

    They could start as voluntary, pay-for-service pilot programs to see if operators appreciate how much better their sprayers are functioning, and to quantify how much waste is been reduced. They wouldn’t necessarily have to be government-run; Industry or Academia may be better conduits. So, what would be required to develop and implement these two programs?

    • We would need to agree on a robust and generic sprayer inspection protocol. We have several European examples to draw on.
    • We would need to agree on the minimal content for a sprayer operator course. Again, we have many to draw on, with the obvious understanding that the core curriculum would be amended to reflect various state and provincial requirements.
    • We would need a trained, third-party organization to take responsibility for overseeing and implementing the two programs.
    • And, of course, we would need the funds to initiate both programs before they would eventually become self-sustaining.

    So, are we dreaming in Technicolor? If responses to this article are any indication, there are those in western society that lash out at the idea of mandatory requirements. But there are supporters, too. Maybe we can learn from those European countries that have been doing this for more than 20 years.

    Thanks to Jan Langenakens of aams for reviewing this article, and providing the videos.

  • Putting a Number on Pesticide Waste

    Putting a Number on Pesticide Waste

    Waste (noun): an act or instance of using or expending something to no purpose.

    In agriculture, environment and economy are intertwined. Producers strive to obtain the maximum return on their inputs. They study incremental returns and avoid applying more inputs than necessary, especially if conditions don’t warrant it.  The financial incentive is powerful, and waste is a four-letter word. This applies to seed, fertilizer, and pesticide. Pesticide labels identify the rate needed to obtain the desired result, and there is no incentive to over-apply. In fact, it’s illegal.

    But there are plenty of other places where applications incur waste. As with time efficiency, it’s a good idea to identify where this waste occurs, and the only tool needed is a sharp pencil.

    When might we incur waste in the spray application process?

    • Mixing more than we need because we don’t trust the flow meter or the tank gauge entirely, or don’t know the exact field size.
    • Priming the boom before the first swath.
    • Overlapping due to curvy terrain and coarse sectional control.
    • Spray drift away from the intended swath.

    How big are the losses?

    Let’s say we have a clean sprayer and need to spray 160 acres before moving to a new crop and product. We plan to apply 10 gallons per acre and have a 1,200 gallon tank with a 120 foot boom. That means we need 1,600 gallons of spray mix in total.

    Once we’re at the field we prime the boom. Each sprayer is different, but depending on operator experience, 30 to 50 gallons are usually needed to push product from the tank to the last nozzle. Only part of that is lost to the ground, as boom sections can be shut off as soon as product has reached every nozzle of that section. We’re assuming 0.2 gallons per foot of boom is lost.

    Spraying itself is relatively straightforward. Swath and sectional control handle the overlaps, but in less ideal terrain, double application is known to account for 4 to 5% of the area to reach non-square parts of the field. This is even more likely when the outer section is 10’ or more. Early turn-on of the boom prior to leaving the headland, to allow boom to reach operating pressure, adds to this.

    Air-activated shutoff for individual nozzles reduces section size at a reasonable cost.

    With an average nozzle, we can expect about 2% of the product to airborne drift. Most airborne won’t return to the ground within the field borders, so it’s a complete loss.

    Most of the spray that travels more than 5 m after leaving boom stays airborne and should be considered a total loss from the field.

    As we finish, the pump will draw air before the tank is empty due to sloshing or foaming, and a 50 to 60 gallon remainder may not be unusual. This simulation has assumed 5% of tank volume remains.

    We also need to purge spray from the boom at cleanout, consuming approximately 0.4 gallons per foot of boom. This occurs after the field is completely sprayed and is therefore considered waste.

    So how does this add up? The following table shows the approximate losses associated with five setups.

    Table 1: Spray mix losses during a sprayer operation. Setup 1 = baseline, Setup 2 = low application volume, Setup 3 = baseline with recirculating boom, tank level monitor, and low-drift nozzles, Setup 4 = large area between cleaning, Setup 5 = large area with recirculating boom, tank level monitor, and low-drift nozzles.

    In the first scenario, we spray just 160 acres at 10 gallons per acre. Priming the boom with 0.4 gallons per foot (allowing for all associated feed lines) consumes 48 gallons, but only wastes half of that, or 1.5% of the total volume needed for the field.

    Four percent overlap consumes another 64 gallons.

    If we have 5% of the tank volume left over, that’s 60 gallons. That amount is so small it doesn’t even register on the sight gauge but nonetheless it represents another 4% of the total sprayed amount.

    Upon cleaning the boom, we need to push the spray mix out of all the  plumbing after the pump, as it has nowhere else to go. At an assumed 0.4 gallons per foot, that’s another 48 gallons or 3%.

    If we add to that a conservative 2% drift loss, it sums to a surprising 14% of the total spray volume. For those that use lower water volumes (the second scenario), the volumetric losses are slightly less, but their proportion is higher, now accounting for 23% (!) of the total spray mix.

    In the third scenario, let’s assume we use a recirculating boom that returns the initial prime volume to the tank, eliminating any waste. We’ll also upgrade to individual nozzle sectional control, reducing overlap to 1%. And, since we want to know exactly what’s left in the tank, let’s invest in an AccuVolume system to precisely monitor tank volume. This allows us to make small rate adjustments up or down to be sure as much of the mixed product goes onto the sprayed swath as possible.

    Recirculating booms allows the spray mix to pass through entire length of boom without being sprayed, saving waste during priming and allowing waste-free boom rinses.

    When the sump begins to empty, we can introduce some water from the clean water tank to push the last of the mix to the boom (a continuous rinse system makes this easy).

    An AccuVolume sensor shows the exact volume left in the tank at any slope position and with 1 gallon resolution, allowing greater accuracy when filling and emptying.

    We’ll assume our sump waste is now reduced to 12 gallons. We still need to dispose of the content of the boom somehow, so the recirculating boom offers no saving there. But let’s also add better low-drift nozzles to reduce drift by 50% (now 1% total volume). Total loss is now just 6%.

    Low-drift nozzles such as this AirMix (Agrotop) SoftDrop reduce airborne drift by 50 to 90%.

    The last two rows in the table repeat the first and third scenarios for a larger sprayed area (1000 acres) before a tank cleaning is needed. This doesn’t change the magnitude of the volumetric loss, but reduces its proportion. Percent loss is down by a factor of two from the 160 acre interval, to 3 to 7%.

    Experienced operators might cheat the system a bit by mixing the required pesticide with some extra water to make up for the plumbing waste. Doing so prevents extra pesticide from being consumed, but it doesn’t reduce the inherent inefficiency.

    Lessons

    This exercise suggests that waste from spraying is probably higher than we assumed. If we average the scenarios, there is 10 to 15% waste. At, say, $200,000 spent on pesticide for a single spraying season, that’s $20 – $30,000 worth of product and water hauled that ends up where it doesn’t belong. Beyond the time and money, there can also be environmental consequences depending on how that waste is treated.

    There are some things that can be done.

    • Know the exact area of the field to be sprayed.
    • Study your sprayer plumbing and consider improvements such as recirculating booms and continuous cleanout.
    • Improve monitoring of tank content to allow lower remainders.
    • Consider individual nozzle shutoff to improve sectional control. These are part of Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) systems, but can also be achieved with less expensive valves.
    • Plan spray operations to minimize the amount of product changeovers.
    • Consider direct injection.

    The return on investment for plumbing improvements can be high and result in considerable future savings over the life of the sprayer. It’s worth thinking about.

    Spray Waste WorksheetDownload
  • Selecting a Sprayer Pump

    Selecting a Sprayer Pump

    When I had to replace a pump on a small scale sprayer, I had a lot of questions about how they worked, their capacities, hose sizes, mounting solutions and fittings. I turned to the Pentair Hypro Shurflo catalog and found a very helpful guide on pages 2 – 10. This article summarizes the steps recommended in the catalog.

    Select Pump Style

    Sprayer pumps can be divided into two categories: Positive Displacement Pumps and Non-Positive Displacement Pumps.

    Positive Displacement Pumps

    These include Roller, Diaphragm and Piston pumps. They are self-priming and traditionally operate at high pressures. Flow from these pumps is directly proportional to the pump speed, which is why they require a relief valve and bypass line between the pump outlet and the nozzle shut-off valve.

    • Roller pumps : This is the most popular pump with farmers world-wide. The seal and roller materials should be selected based on their compatibilities with the pesticides.
    • Diaphragm pumps : These compact pumps are popular for use with abrasive and corrosive pesticides. Their oil-filled piston chambers protect the pump materials.
    • Piston pumps : Similar to car engines, these pumps are relatively low-flow and high-pressure and suited for use with handguns sprayers. The piston cup materials should be selected based on their compatibilities with the pesticides.

    Non-Positive Displacement Pumps

    These include Turbine (or Transfer) and Centrifugal pumps. They must be primed and traditionally operate at low to medium pressures, although there are models available that can go up to 190 psi. Flow from these durable pumps comes from a rotating impeller that feeds liquid through the lines instead of pumping “per stroke”. Therefore, if the outlet is closed for brief periods, the impeller spins harmlessly, so a relief valve is not needed.

    Determine PTO Pump Drive

    When selecting a pump, you must specify the shaft rotation. Hypro suggests two steps for determining the required rotation:

    1. Eyes on the End: Face the rotating Power Take-Off (PTO) and determine if it is spinning clockwise (CW) or counter-clockwise (CCW).
    2. Opposites Attract: The pump must rotate opposite to the PTO. For example, if the PTO rotates CW, then the pump must rotate CCW and vice versa.

    You should also be aware of your tractors’ horse power, and in order to determine the size of pump shaft, you should know the spline dimensions (e.g. 1-3/8″ (6 spline) pto shaft or 1-3/8″ 21-spline pto shaft).

    Determine Pressure and Flow Requirements

    In order to size the pump, you have to know the sprayer settings, such as intended application rate, average ground speed, agitation requirements, etc. Most can be calculated form the following formulae (provided in US and Metric units):

    Calculating Agitation Requirements

    • Liquids :

    Tank Volume (US gal.) × 0.05 = Agitation Requirement (gpm)
    Tank Volume (L) × 0.05 = Agitation Requirement (L/min.)

    • Wettable Powders and Flowables

    Tank Volume (US gal.) × 0.125 = Agitation Requirement (gpm)
    Tank Volume (L) × 0.125 = Agitation Requirement (L/min.)

    If the sprayer has a hydraulic agitation system equipped with a jet, it multiplies the agitation output without the need for additional flow. For example, it might have a 1 gpm input flow and boost it to a 10 gpm output. This savings should be accounted for:

    Agitation Requirement (gpm) × (Input ÷ Output) = Total Agitation (gpm)
    Agitation Requirement (L/min.) × (Input ÷ Output) = Total Agitation (L/min.)

    Therefore, if you calculate a 60 gpm requirement for agitation, and have a jet that boosts the output 3:1:

    60 gpm x (1 / 3) = 20 (gpm)

    Calculating Nozzle Requirements

    Once the agitation requirements are accounted for, you have to account for nozzles. The calculations are a little different for each sprayer, but they amount to the same thing – Total flow in US Gallons per minute or Litres per minute. Here is the calculation for a boom sprayer. For an airblast sprayer, assuming you are spraying every row, substitute “Row Spacing” for “Boom width”.

    Total Flow Requirement (gpm) = [Output (gpa) x Ground Speed (mph) × Boom width (ft)] ÷ 495

    Total Flow Requirement (L/min.) = [Output (L/ha) x Ground Speed (km/h) × Boom width (m)] ÷ 600

    When the flow requirement for agitation and the flow requirement for the nozzles have been calculated, they are added together. It is important not to under-size the pump, so always factor in an extra 20% to compensate for changes in performance (such as pump wear and slower ground speeds) and restrictions in the plumbing systems that can cause pressure drops between the pump and nozzles, as follows:

    (Agitation Requirement + Nozzle Requirement) × 1.2 = Total Flow Requirement

    Finally, be sure to account for any other flow requirements, such as tank rinsing nozzles and hose length/diameter (which causes pressure drops), and have some idea how you want to place the pump relative to the tractor and sprayer. If you prepare all this information, you can quickly and easily discuss your options with the retailer and select the pump that best suits your needs.

    For more information on various types of pumps, check out this article by Dr. Bob Wolf:

  • Pressure Spikes and Relief Valves on Air-Assist Sprayers

    Pressure Spikes and Relief Valves on Air-Assist Sprayers

    A properly-sized pump should produce more flow than is needed and work in conjunction with the atomizers to regulate that flow. Typical to high pressure pumps, a piston relief valve (aka regulator) should maintain the desired system pressure through the normal speed range of the sprayer, regardless of the number of booms (or boom-sections) that are on or off. This is achieved by balancing the sprayer pressure against the relief valve spring, which must move freely across a range of flows.

    But what does it mean when the pressure gauge briefly spikes off-scale when boom are turned on or off? This is bad for the gauge and will eventually cause it to fail. Quite often, pressure spikes are an indication of one of two things:

    • A dirty or stuck valve
    • An inappropriate spring size
    A pressure gauge spiking beyond its range.
    A pressure gauge spiking beyond its range.

    Relief valve maintenance

    Sometimes, pressure spikes indicate a need for valve cleaning and maintenance.

    • The regulator spring cavity may be packed with dirt, which limits valve travel. Clean the housing and spring, and then lubricate and adjust.
    • The regulator may be partially seized or sticky. If the regulator piston and cylinder bores are caked with spray they will ‘hold’ the valve until the pressure/spring balance overcomes the friction.
    • Sometimes valve, and/or the valve guide pin are seized. Disassemble them, clean all sliding surfaces, then lubricate and adjust.
    • Valve/seat wear may have created a leak. You may have already tightened the spring to compensate, but this loads the spring past the pressure balance point you want to spray at. This means that when the booms are shut off, the pressure increases until it reaches the ‘new’ spring balance point. Repair (or replace) the regulator, then lubricate and adjust. Be aware that any leak (external or internal) can contribute to this condition and tightening the spring isn’t the solution.
    • The spring may be damaged (e.g. bent, corroded, etc.). Replace the spring, lubricate and adjust.

    Note: Be sure to read the operator’s manual before you do anything. You should understand your sprayer’s design before you perform any maintenance, adjustments or calibration.

    Spring size

    Sometimes, the relief valve may be mechanically sound, but the spring may not be sized to match a reduced operating pressure. Relief valve springs match the maximum pressure range of the pump. Sprayers operated at lower pressure may be unable to compress the spring. This is common when people switch from disc-core nozzles operated at higher pressure to molded nozzles operated at lower pressure.

    This would manifest when one boom is shut off for single-boom operation; there may not be enough pressure to open the bypass. As a result, flow increases over the remaining boom.

    Recognizing this problem, some operators have teed-in a second relief valve capable of finer adjustments at lower pressures. Make sure you know what you’re doing if you’re considering this option.

    Technically, a spring can either be too weak, or too heavy:

    • The spring may be too weak for the pressure being used (i.e. any adjustment bottoms out). In order to obtain sufficient pressure the operator tightens the spring until it is virtually collapsed, essentially creating a fixed orifice. When the booms are closed the ‘fixed orifice’ doesn’t compensate and pressure rises to force the increased flow through that small orifice.
    • If the spring is too heavy for the pressure being used (any adjustment barely touches the spring when pump is turned off). In this case, the pressure being used will not deflect the spring, so the operator closes the regulator until the ‘fixed orifice’ creates sufficient restriction to flow to achieve the desired pressure. When the booms are closed the ‘fixed orifice’ doesn’t compensate and pressure rises to force the increased flow through, or until the spring begins to deflect.
    • In either situation the spring must be sized so it is in the centre-third of its flex range (i.e. rest state > fully collapsed) at the desired pressure. You can buy springs from the sprayer dealer or hardware supply. Try to maintain original length and diameter of the coil, while varying the diameter of the wire.

    Engineering

    In some cases, it is not a matter of valve maintenance, or spring size, but poor engineering. Consider the following:

    • The valve supply and return may be too small for the pump flow. Consult hose and fitting catalogs for flow capacities and lengths. Re-size the hoses and fittings appropriately, and then adjust the regulator.
    • There may be kinks or sharp bends in in the supply and return lines. Re-route the hoses and/or fittings to avoid kinks and sharp bends, and then adjust the regulator.
    • The relief valve may be too small for the pump flow. Consult a regulator catalog for flow capacities and replace the regulator with an appropriate size. Calibrate the regulator spring and adjust.
    • Relief valves have a ‘cracking’ pressure (that’s when the valve just starts to open). Well-designed regulators have small pressure changes from ‘cracking’ to full flow. That information is in their catalogs. Poorly designed regulators have large pressure changes between these two ratings and these regulators should be avoided.
    • The pump may be too big for system. This often happens when sprayers are upgraded and pumps are replaced. Consult the catalogs and reduce pump size or speed, or increase the sizes of the hoses, fittings and regulator.
    • There may be a hydraulic agitator jet on the regulator ‘tank’ line. An agitator jet applies considerable back pressure to a system, and when booms are closed the increased flow causes more than a linear increase in pressure.
    • Broadly, the sprayer system as a whole may be poorly engineered. Inspect and draw a flow path of the sprayer system. Examine where everything is going (or not going). Is it possible someone made changes that the manufacturer did not intend? Consult the manufacturer if you are uncertain. Sometimes, it will have to be re-engineered, which may require expert consultation.

    Note: Your pressure gauge can tell you a lot more than your operating pressure – it can indicate a problem with your regulator, pump, lines or overall sprayer engineering. Don’t ignore it – address it.

    Thanks to Murray Thiessen, Consulting Agricultural Mechanic, for his contribution to this article.