Tag: drift

  • What is Delta T and why is it important for spraying?

    What is Delta T and why is it important for spraying?

    Click here to listen to Audio Article

    Humidity is important in spraying. With the average tank of pesticide being 90 to 99.5% water, evaporation plays an important role in both droplet size and active ingredient concentration. Low humidity causes droplets to evaporate faster, potentially increasing drift and reducing uptake. But relative humidity (RH) isn’t the best way to measure this effect because the same RH at two different temperatures results in two different water evaporation rates.

    Instead, we present Delta T, also known as “wet bulb depression”. Delta T is an atmospheric moisture parameter whose use in spraying has made its way to North America from Australian operations. It is defined as the dry bulb temperature minus the wet bulb temperature, and provides a better indication of water evaporation rate than RH. Higher Delta T means faster water evaporation.

    The recommendations from Australia are to avoid spraying when the Delta T is either too high or too low, with a range of two to eight being described as ideal.

    Figure 1: Delta T chart used in Australia (Source: Australian Gov’t Dept of Meteorology)

    Delta T is being reported on an increasing number of weather stations, and it’s time we took a closer look at what it means.

    Measuring Relative Humidity

    In the early days of weather reporting, relative humidity was calculated from psychrometric charts. All one needed was a hygrometer, usually a sling psychrometer. A sling psychrometer is two identical thermometers side by side whose bulbs could be slung in a circle, exposing them to moving air. One bulb was covered in a cotton wick moistened with distilled water, the other was left exposed and dry.

    Figure 2: Sling psychrometer (Source: ScienceStruck.com)

    As the bulbs met moving air, water evaporated from the cotton wick and that reduced the temperature of that thermometer. The dryer the air, the greater the evaporation rate and therefore the greater the temperature drop. The dry thermometer was unaffected by this movement.

    On measuring the wet and dry bulb temperature, one consulted a psychrometric chart. This chart converted the two temperatures to total water content in the air, compared it to total water-holding capacity, and expressed it as Relative Humidity. Psychrometric charts are useful for many other air parameters such as dew point, vapour pressure, or enthalpy. (Pause briefly to give thanks that we don’t need to know what enthalpy is.)

    Figure 3: Psychrometric Chart (Source: Carrier Corporation)

    Turns out that RH is a poor measure of water evaporation rate. An RH of 24% at 20 C has exactly the same evaporation rate as an RH of 44% at 35 C. That’s why Delta T is the preferred measurement: it’s linearly related to evaporation.

    Note: Modern electronic weather stations don’t need two thermometers to measure air moisture content, and use polymers whose capacitance or resistance changes with atmospheric moisture. Add an internal look-up table, and we have all the information we need.

    Pros and Cons of Water Evaporation

    It’s important to note that our Australian colleagues caution against spraying when water evaporation rate is both too high and too low.

    Too High:

    • Water evaporates rapidly, reducing droplet size and pre-disposing the smaller droplets to drift;
    • Deposited droplets dry quickly, reducing pesticide uptake which is more effective from a wet deposit.

    Too Low:

    • Water doesn’t evaporate, maintaining the smaller droplets in a liquid state. These small droplets are already drift prone, but are now more potent because of more effective uptake. Overnight conditions that are inverted are usually humid, adding to harm potential from the inversion.

    Delta T in North America

    The addition of this parameter to our spraying weather lexicon has been useful. But it’s important to understand the context in which it was developed to properly judge its suitability.

    Aussies started talking about Delta T because the use of finer sprays under the hot dry conditions found during their summer sprays resulted in significant evaporative losses, significantly greater drift potential, and potential reduction of product performance. The guidelines to avoid spraying when Delta T exceeds eight or ten originate there.

    A few changes have happened since these guidelines were developed. Over the past ten to 20 years, we’ve observed greater use of low-drift sprays, with the coarser sprays’ larger droplets resisting fast evaporation. In the past five to ten years, water volumes have increased due to our heavier reliance on fungicides, desiccants, and contact modes of action. Both of these developments have helped reduce the impact of a dry atmosphere. We simply can’t say if a Delta T of 10 is too high with these new application methods.

    Looking at it another way, if Delta T values are very high, increasing water volume and droplet size will mitigate that to some degree, as the Aussies state in their extension materials (linked earlier).

    Formulation

    Pesticide formulation can also play a role in evaporation. Once the water is gone, oily formulations may still have good uptake because the oily active ingredient stays dissolved in the oily solvents. This is both good and bad, helping on-target efficacy but also increasing the risk of more potent drift. Solutions, on the other hand, are more likely to leave their actives stranded on leaves as crystals once the water is gone.

    Bottom Line

    Delta T is definitely useful information when spraying. It will typically rise and fall with air temperature as the day proceeds, and it is wise to consider suspending operations when values are critical. Take note of the Delta T when spraying the same product throughout these hot days and learn from the experience. Remember, the atmosphere affects not just sprays but also plants and insects, and due to this complexity we may not be able to attribute success or failure to just one measurement.

  • “Bee” Responsible with Pesticide Sprays

    “Bee” Responsible with Pesticide Sprays

    Horticultural crops cannot be produced commercially without the use of pesticides to manage the impacts of insects and pathogens. Growers recognize the importance of pollinators and in some cases, rely on bees for pollination. Growers are practicing due-diligence to try to minimize the effects of necessary pest management activities on bees. There’s a fine balance between managing pests effectively and economically and minimizing the effects of pesticides on pollinators. Impact on pollinators is a major consideration for the registration of pesticides.

    Not all pesticides are toxic to honeybees.

    Not a honeybee, but a great photo of a pollinator on a spray boom near some nozzles. Too good not to use.

    Growers use IPM practices which means that they are spraying only when necessary (monitoring for pest levels) rather than following a calendar-based program. Because each droplet of spray that does not land on the target (the crop) is wasted money, growers are more conscious of drift and are using technology to reduce off-target drift.

    The Ontario Bees Act states “No person shall spray or dust fruit trees during the period within which the trees are in bloom with a mixture containing any poisonous substance injurious to bees unless almost all the blossoms have fallen from the trees.” While some crops, like grapes and peaches, do not rely on insects for pollination, bees may still visit their flowers and they are still present in vineyards and orchards before and after bloom, foraging for nectar and pollen on flowering plants in row middles and surrounding vegetation areas. We have been promoting row middle management with flowering plants to encourage the presence of beneficial insects. Honey bees are also attracted to these plants. For this reason, it’s important to recognize that sprays applied to manage pests may have adverse effects on honey bees as well.

    One of the most important things to do is to maintain communication between growers/custom operators and beekeepers. While it’s common sense to not allow insecticides to drift directly onto bee hives, bees will usually forage up to 3 km from a hive and when food sources are scarce, they are known to fly as far as 12 km (8 miles) (Download reference).

    BeeConnected is an app connecting registered beekeepers with registered farmers and spray contractors, enabling anonymous communication on the location of hives and crop protection product activities. The app is available free of charge through a web browser, the Apple App Store and Google Play.

    Here are a few others things you can do:

    Read the pesticide label:

    Carefully follow listed precautions with regard to bee safety. In some cases a product may not be used while bees are actively foraging.

    Product selection:

    Pesticides (insecticides and fungicides) are not all equally toxic to honey bees. It is also important to be familiar with the relative toxicity of pest control products to bees. In Publication 360, Fruit Crop Protection Guide, the relative honeybee toxicity is now listed in the fungicide and insecticide activity tables of each chapter. The impact of products that are moderately toxic to bees can be can be minimized if dosage, timing and method of application are correct. Highly toxic products may cause severe losses if used when bees are present at treatment time or within a few days thereafter.

    Choose the least hazardous insecticide formulation. Emulsifiable formulations normally have a shorter residual toxicity to bees than wettable powders and flowables which, in addition to having residual characteristics can be more easily picked up from the flowering plant while bees are gathering pollen.

    Spray timing:

    Whenever possible, apply products with toxicity to bees in late evening, night or early morning while bees are not foraging (generally between 8 p.m. and 8 a.m.). Evening applications are less hazardous to bees than early morning applications. Warm days and nights can extend the foraging period; therefore applications may be necessary later in the evening or earlier in the morning under unusually warm conditions. Do not apply insecticides when cool temperatures are expected after treatment. Residues will remain toxic to bees for a much longer time under cool conditions. Do not apply insecticides that are toxic to bees on crops in bloom, including crops containing weeds or cover crops in bloom. Avoid treating during hot evenings if beehives are very close to the target field and honey bees are clustered on the outside of the hives.

    Remove alternate pollen sources:

    Where feasible, eliminate weeds or flowers in row middles by mowing at least 2 days before a pesticide with toxicity to bees is to be applied.

    Minimize off-target drift:

    Drift of spray applications can cause significant bee poisoning problems, particularly when drift reaches colonies or adjacent flowering weeds. In general, sprays should not be applied if wind speed exceeds 10 mph and favors drift towards colonies. Give careful attention to position of bee colonies relative to wind speed and direction. Ensure that there are no colonies directly in the orchard at the time of spray. Select drift-reducing spray nozzle technology, whenever possible. Since fine droplets tend to drift farther, apply spray at lower pressures or choose low-drift nozzles that reduce drift by producing a medium to coarse droplet size.

    Calibrate spray equipment often. Air-blast sprayers can produce finer droplets with greater drift potential. When using an air-blast sprayer, consider redirecting or turning off nozzles, or use technologies that reduce drift (for example, towers, multirow, tunnel and target-sensing sprayers). Shut off sprayer when making turns at field ends or gardens, near large puddles, ponds and other sources of water that may be used by pollinators and other wildlife.

    There is a precaution to nighttime spraying: you must be aware of inversions. When you spray during an inversion, the larger drops fall quickly (per normal), but smaller lighter droplets fall very slowly (a few centimetres per second). They do not disperse. Instead, they move with the air they were released into, evaporating very slowly, over great distances. These small particles, as well as vapours from volatilizing products, are capable of moving for kilometers and are therefore subject to drift.

    The only sure way to know if you are in an inversion is to take two air temperature readings: the first about 10 cm from the ground, and the second about three metres off the ground. If the surface air temperature is cooler, you are in an inversion. The magnitude of the difference indicates how strong the inversion is. Accurate measurements are difficult to manage with conventional thermometers (Although the new Spot-On Inversion Detector makes it possible). It is generally easier for sprayer operators to watch for the following cues:

    • Large temperature swings between daytime and the previous night.
    • Calm (e.g. less than 3 km/h wind) and clear conditions when the sun is low.
    • Intense high pressure systems (usually associated with clear skies) and low humidity where you intend to spray.
    • Dew or frost indicating cooler air near the ground (fog may be too late).
    • Smoke or dust hanging in the air or moving laterally.
    • Odours travelling large distances and seeming more intense.
    • Daytime cumulus clouds collapse toward the evening.
    • Overnight cloud cover is 25% or less.

    If you suspect a strong inversion, don’t spray. Postpone the application if possible.

    Reducing pesticide injury to honey bees requires communication and cooperation between beekeepers and growers and applicators. It is important that beekeepers understand cropping practices and pest management practices used by farmers in the vicinity of their apiaries. Likewise, pesticide applicators should be sensitive to locations of apiaries, obtain a basic understanding of honey bee behavior, and learn which materials and application practices are the most hazardous to bees.

    Furthermore a number of native pollinators such as bumblebees, leaf cutter bees, sweat bees and squash bees are also important pollinators in some crops and they too require consideration. While it is unlikely that all poisonings can be avoided, a balance must be struck between the effective use of insecticides, the preservation of pollinators and the rights of all — the beekeeper, farmer and applicator.

  • ExactApply Primer

    ExactApply Primer

    ExactApply is an application system capable of PWM, introduced by John Deere in August, 2017, with its first customer field season in 2018. ExactApply offers several unique features that differentiate it from the existing systems. Here is a brief description of its major components and capabilities:

    Nozzle Body Design:

    • The body contains a turret with six numbered nozzle locations, all pointed down, and two solenoids, one on either side of the body. Three nozzle locations are on short feeds (locations 1, 2, and 3), whereas the remainder are on long feeds (4, 5, and 6). The front locations and left solenoid is called “A”, whereas the right solenoid and rear location is “B”.
    ExactyApply nozzle body
    • Nozzles are paired so that A or B or both are capable of spraying at a time, depending on the selected mode. Pairs are 1 & 4, 2 & 5, and 3 & 6. The operator manually rotates the desired nozzle pair into position.
    • When a short feed (1, 2, or 3) is placed at the front of the body, the system is in Separated Mode. In this mode, the left solenoid controls the front nozzle and the right solenoid control the rear nozzle. Either or both can be used, in pulsing (PWM) or conventional mode, selected through the monitor.
    • When a long feed (4, 5, or 6) is placed at the front, the body is in Combined Mode. Now, all flow from the right and left solenoid can only exit the front nozzle. Very high flows are achievable in Combined Mode, making it suitable for liquid fertilizer application. It may not have other practical applications in Western Canada.
    View from left side of body (solenoids removed). Turret position #4 (tall feed) is in front, and #1 (short feed) is in back, placing the body in Combined Mode.
    • In Pulsing Mode, each solenoid pulses at 15 Hz, meaning it completes 15 open-and-close-cycles per second. The A and B solenoid timing is offset by 180 degrees, so that the B nozzle is in the middle of its on-cycle when the A nozzle is in the middle of its off cycle. In combined mode, this means that the system operates at 30 Hz.
    • Adjacent bodies are also 180 degrees out of sync with each other, similar to Capstan, Raven, and TeeJet bodies, so that whenever a nozzle is off, its adjacent partners are on (when operating at 50% DC and above). Another way of saying this is that all even-numbered bodies act together, and all odd-numbered bodies act together but half a cycle later. This results in a blended pulse that prevents skips.
    Plunger assembly inside solenoid. Black plastic portion can be removed, exposing poppet and spring.
    • The proportion of each cycle that the solenoids are open is known as the duty cycle (DC). At 100% DC, the valves are always open. At 50% DC, the valves are open 50% of the time. The minimum DC allowed by the system in default is 25%. This can be lowered to a smaller value within the monitor.
    Opened plunger assembly showing tip of poppet (right) and seat (left)
    Poppet inside plunger assembly is pulled back by magnet inside solenoid 15 times per second
    • DC is closely related to the flow rate of the nozzle. There are two ways of looking at this. An 08 sized tip operating at 40 psi will have a flow rate of 0.8 US gpm at 100% DC, about 0.4 US gpm at 50% DC, and close to 0.2 US gpm at 25% DC. This feature is primarily useful when sprayer speed is changed, requiring new flow rates without a change in spray pressure.
    • Pulsing Mode is not available for nozzles sized smaller than 02, or for air-induced tips.
    • Pulsing can be disabled to allow the use of air-induced or other tip technologies that may not function well when pulsed. This is called AutoSelect Mode.

    AutoSelect Mode:

    • AutoSelect Mode (“Auto Mode” in 4600 monitor) can be used to achieve three unique flow rates. “A” alone, “B” alone, or “A” & “B”. When properly staggered, a travel speed range similar to Pulsing Mode can be achieved, although pressure will rise within each nozzle as travel speeds increase, as in a conventional system.
    • In AutoSelect Mode, the user selects a tip for position A, and an incrementally larger tip for position B. The monitor requires that the user inputs minimum and maximum pressures for A, B, and A&B. Travels speeds corresponding to these tip and pressure choices are calculated, and the monitor warns the user when speeds don’t overlap. The user either changes minimum and maximum spray pressures, or selects a different sized tip to eliminate the gap.
    • AutoSelect Mode is useful when a certain specific tip is required which is not compatible with Pulsing Mode, for example drift protection with air-induced tips.

    Pulsing Mode Nozzle Selection

    At this time, John Deere nozzles best suited to the ExactApply’s Pulsing Mode are the LDM, LD, LDX, and 3D. Of these, the LDM most closely represents the spray quality of the LDA and ULD that John Deere operators are accustomed to. The remainder are considerably finer.

    ASABE spray qualities for Low-Drift Max (LDM) tips. Being Very Coarse at lower pressures, applicators are advised to use higher spray pressures (50 to 70 psi) when coverage is important.
    ASABE spray qualities for Guardian (LDX) tips. Note that the smaller sizes (03, 04, 05) produce finer sprays and will require pressures below 40 psi to have any reasonable drift reduction.
    ASABE spray qualities for 3D tips. As with LDX, the smaller sizes (03, 04, 05) produce finer sprays and will require pressures below 30 psi to have any reasonable drift reduction. Such low pressures may narrow the spray pattern.
    ASABE spray qualities for Low-Drift (LD) tips. As with LDX, the smaller sizes (03, 04) produce finer sprays and will require pressures below 40 psi to have any reasonable drift reduction.
    ASABE spray qualities for the Low-Drift Twin (LDT). Comprised of two same-sized LD tips assembled in a TwinCap.

    Proper sizing for PWM requires that tips be sized for about 20 to 40% extra capacity. In other words, at expected average travel speeds, the pulsing duty cycle should be approximately 60 to 80%. The following chart has a highlighted column at 70% duty cycle for that reason. Assuming an ExactApply operator expects to apply 5 gpa and travel at 15 mph on average, possible nozzle options (highlighted in yellow) are:

    03 at 60 psi

    04 at 30 psi

    05 at 20 psi

    06 at 15 psi

    Calibration chart for PWM systems. Nozzles are sized at about 70% Duty Cycle (grey column). Options for 5 gpa at 15 mph are highlighted yellow. Black highlights represent speeds >25 mph, not available.

    The best choice will likely be either of the first two options, as the third and fourth have spray pressures which are probably too low for good nozzle performance. The decision would depend on the spray quality obtained for each of the remaining two options.

    Of course, spray pressure can be altered to suit the operator’s spray quality requirements. This merely affects the available speed range as well as the DC at which the system operates at a given target speed, possibly affecting Pulsing Mode utility.

    The row of speeds adjacent to the selected nozzle and pressure identifies the approximate travel speed range that can be expected, from 25 to 100% DC.

    It’s important to know your current DC to be sure the system is operating properly, and also to take full advantage of turn compensation features. We’ve described a way to place a DC display module on your home screen here.

    Download an Excel version of this chart here.

    The application volume can be changed to suit the specific use, the chart’s speed values are updated automatically. Make sure the nozzle spacing at the top left is correct for your sprayer

    Pressure Drop across Solenoids

    PWM solenoids represent a restriction to flow, and may cause a pressure drop. John Deere has published the pressure drop, and it is shown in the above chart (download version only). The pressure drop is fairly low, only 2 psi for an 04 tip operating in separated mode at 40 psi. For an 06 tip, the drop is 3 psi, and for an 08, it’s 6 psi. a #10 tip has a 10 psi drop at 40 psi. These pressure drops must be added to the operating pressure of the sprayer. Pressure drop is important because the LDX, LD, and 3D tips will be operated at low pressures to obtain coarse sprays for drift protection. Operating an 08 tip at 20 psi (at which pressure it has s drop of 3 psi) will result in in a tip pressure of 17 psi. Since we are at the low end of a nozzle’s operating range, pattern stability may be compromised when the drop is not taken into account.

    Why 70% Duty Cycle?

    An operator of any PWM system needs to know their current duty cycle. On ExactApply, a module can be installed on the home screen that provides a visual display. We show how to do this here.

    There are five main reasons a nozzle should be sized to run at approximately 70% DC. The first is to provide speed flexibility. An operator may need to speed up somewhat, but usually not more than 30%. On the other hand, slowing down is much more common to accommodate challenging terrain, and a factor of two to three is possible (from 70% DC to 25% DC).

    Secondly, drift reduction through lower spray pressure usually requires less speed due to the associated lower flow rate. With some DC room to spare, the loss of flow can be corrected without requiring a speed change.

    Thirdly, spot spraying at a slightly higher rate is possible, again through DC alone.

    Fourth, Nozzle Rate Boost of up to 25% for up to six nozzle locations is possible within the monitor, but only if the system is operating at 75% DC or less.

    Finally, turn compensation, during which the outside boom travels faster than the tractor unit and the inside boom slower, requires this additional capacity. More on turn compensation here.

    AutoSelect Mode Nozzle Selection

    AutoSelect Mode allows for three flow rates to be used in succession: A, then B, the AB. The key to success is to use small size increments between A and B, and to use tips that have a wide pressure range.

    In the example below, the A location was an 02 tip and the B was an 03, for a total of 05. Pressure was not allowed to drop below 30 psi to retain good patterns. Pressure at switch over to the next largest flow rate therefore needed to be 80 psi to make the moves possible without pressure gaps resulting in over-application. As a result, the spray quality can be expected to fluctuate three times as the sprayer accelerates through A, B, and AB in succession.

    Nozzle selection should seek to emphasize the middle of the pressure range of either B or AB to avoid unnecessary fluctuations.

    Spray pressure and travel speed as Auto Mode moves through A, then B, then both A&B

    Download an Excel sheet that assists in nozzle selection for Auto Mode here.

    Maintenance

    A maintenance kit comes with each ExactApply sprayer. It contains two spare plunger assemblies, clips, and pins, as well as a brush, an O-ring picker, and a torque driver.

    Maintenance kit

    The ExactApply body is fairly easy to take apart for servicing. Hair pins at the back of the unit secure each solenoid, and both pull out easily. The plunger assembly can be disassembled without tools. Take care not to drop the poppet spring!

    Reassembly of the plunger requires the use of the torque driver fitted with a 17 mm socket, included in the kit. Do not over-tighten the plastic component.

    Aside from the manual rotation of the turret to select a different nozzle combination, the only moving part in the ExactApply body is the poppet in the plunger assembly. This piece is the valve that controls flow rate, and opens and closes 15 times per second whenever pulsing mode is on, moving like a piston in a cylinder. Debris (sand, fertilizer crystals, etc.) can interfere with the seal of the poppet against its seat, and good filtration is important.

    In the first generation, metal flakes began appearing inside some plunger assemblies . A coating de-laminates off the sleeve and can cause the plunger to stick. This has been starting at 800 h of use. The springs have also been observed to break. This problem has been addressed in newer generations.

    Metal flakes interfering with plunger action
    Plunger damage showing likely source of metal flakes
    Broken plunger spring

    Certain formulations may build up a residue that interferes with poppet movement. It’s impossible to predict all possible formulation impacts, but oily formulations such as emulsifiable concentrates (EC, milky appearance) are likely to be more problematic than solutions (S, clear appearance). John Deere recommends a daily rinse of the boom through both the A and B valves with Erase, a tank cleaner product. Fortunately, the R series sprayer allow for boom flushes from the clean water tank even when the product tank has product in it.

    Each nozzle body contains ten O-rings and two sets of seals. The turret assembly has two large rings, and each plunger assembly has four. Care needs to be taken to prevent damage to these rings to prevent leaks.

    O-rings in nozzle body

    Some Recommendations

    The ExactApply system is very full featured and customers new to PWM can be overwhelmed by the number of choices at their disposal. Let’s simplify the system and make some basic recommendations.

    1. Pulsing mode is likely to be the most useful feature of the system. Plan to use this feature for most spraying operations.
    2. In Pulsing mode, select from John Deere’s LDM, LDX, LD, and 3D tips. The LDX, LD, and 3D offer similar Medium spray qualities and should be operated between 20 and 40 psi to produce lower-drift sprays. Check spray patterns at these pressures and ensure that 100% overlap is achieved (pattern width is twice nozzle spacing).
    3. The LDM (Low Drift Max) is coarser than the above nozzles (comparable to ULD or LDA) and is available in 03, 04, 05, 06, 08, and 10 sizes. This will be the tip of choice for pulsing mode and can be used at higher pressures to ensure good pattern formation.
    4. Separated mode can handle most flow rates, and offers the flexibility of choosing A (front tip) or B (rear tip) or both. This means turret 1, 2, or 3 will be in the forward (A) location.
    5. Equip the A location with your low volume tip (say, 5 gpa). Place the high volume tip (say 10 gpa) at the B location. Use both together for late season sprays into dense canopies (in this case, A&B=15 gpa)
    6. Twin tips for Fusarium Head Blight (FHB) can be achieved in five different ways.
      1. 3D tips in “A” or “B”, alternating their orientation along the boom (forward, backward, forward…). Pulsing Mode. (Since these tips are not very coarse, low pressures are needed to ensure that the angle of the spray persists more than a few inches).
      2. 3D tips in “A” and “B” on each body, front facing forward, rear facing backward, and operating in A&B. Pulsing Mode.
      3. LDT (Low Drift Twin) in “A” or “B”. LDT is a TwinCap with two LD tips installed. Pulsing Mode.
      4. LDM (Low Drift Max) in installed in a TwinCap in “A” or “B”. These are coarser sprays that will retain their direction longer and are well suited for FHB. Pulsing Mode.
      5. GAT (GuardianAIR Twin), an air-induced tip, running in either conventional “A” mode or in Auto Mode but sized for “B” (avoid operating in A&B to prevent pattern interference).

    Some recent recommendations: A customer wanted tips for 5, 10, and 15 gpa at 14 mph, and the 15 gpa was for FHB. He didn’t want to be too coarse. We recommended the LDM 03 at 60 psi (5 gpa) in “B”, the 3D 08 at 30 psi (10 gpa) in “A”, and both together, with the 3D facing forward, for FHB for 15 gpa. The sprays would be “Coarse”, a nice middle ground.

    ExactApply joins Capstan PinPoint II, Raven Hawkeye, and WEEDit Quadro, Agrifact StrictSprayPlus, and TeeJet DynaJet with PWM capable systems. Auto Mode is a version of nozzle switching first introduced into the market as Arag Seletron and Hypro DuoReact. It appears to be a full-featured system that is fully integrated into the new John Deere 4600 display but is also available as a retrofit on the older R-Series 2630-equipped sprayers.

  • The Misplay of our Generation

    The Misplay of our Generation

    We tend to overestimate the effect of a technology in the short run and underestimate the effect in the long run.

    –Amara’s Law of Computing

    We tend to overestimate the effect of a stewardship mistake in the short run and underestimate the effect in the long run.

    –Wolf’s Adaptation of Amara’s Law to Agricultural Stewardship

    August 9, 2017

    Since June of 2017, we’ve been hearing reports of widespread dicamba damage symptoms in soybeans throughout the US mid-south and midwest. It appears that millions of acres could ultimately be affected, and yield impacts are unknown at this time.

    For those new to the issue, dicamba is a broadleaf herbicide in the Group 4 mode of action group, a benzoic acid. It’s an important tool for herbicide resistance management for weeds like palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and waterhemp (A. tuberculatus), populations of which have become resistant to Group 2 (ALS inhibitors), Group 5 (triazines), Group 9 (glyphosate), Group 14 (PPO inhibitors) and Group 27 (HPPD inhibitors) in some places.

    Dicamba is a volatile herbicide, discovered in 1942 and first registered in the US in 1967. Its primary use was in corn and other cereal crops, lawns, and rights of way, at comparatively low doses, and relatively early in the season.

    Calling a pesticide volatile means it can evaporate after application, either from a liquid or a dry deposit, for hours or sometimes days after application. The resulting vapor cloud can move unpredictably, depending on atmospheric conditions, and affect plants long distances away. Higher temperatures increase vapor loss.

    Starting this year, dicamba-tolerant soybeans and cotton (Xtend varieties) were sprayed with new lower-volatility formulations of dicamba, XtendiMax, Engenia, and FeXapan, to control certain broadleaf weeds (including the Amaranth species above) without harming the soybeans. Problem is, dicamba can harm non-Xtend soybeans and other plants, even at very low doses. And these registrations were for applications that occurred later in the season, at higher doses than before.

    I usually don’t get involved in people’s decision about whether to spray, or what to spray. But I do get involved when it comes down to how to spray. That’s my job. The real question to me is “can this product be used safely in cotton and soybeans?” Right now, the jury’s out on that one.

    In my business, our guiding principles are what some people have called the “Three Es of Application”, Efficacy, Efficiency, & Environment.

    We use sprays to control pests. That’s the only reason. We have to apply them so that they work, or else it’s a wasted effort. That’s the efficacy part. We also need to use our resources, time, money, etc., efficiently so the whole process doesn’t bankrupt us and we have time left for other important tasks.  That’s efficiency. And finally, we need to protect the environment, and that means making sure the product lands where it’s intended.

    None of these three priorities trumps the others. All need to be met to the best degree possible. And due to ever-changing conditions, we will typically change our approach to emphasize one or two of these three over the others, to have a working system.

    Simply put, pesticides belong on target surfaces covered by the swath of the sprayer, and nowhere else. If they do move elsewhere (something we’ve come to view as inevitable), regulators conduct risk assessments to ensure that this movement does not result in harm. If harm is possible, mitigating tools such as application timing, product rate, spray method, and buffer zones may be imposed. If those tools aren’t enough to ensure safety, regulators deny product registration. That’s their job.

    But even if no harm is done by trespass, the products still need to be on-target. That’s stewardship. It’s a principle whose adherence gives license for a technology to be used. It gives others faith in our competence. Practicing this principle when it’s easy prepares us for hard times.

    I respect our regulatory process, and know it to be increasingly conservative with regards to risk the less data there are. I worked for the PMRA (the Canadian pesticide regulatory agency) as an application expert for five years. I know the system isn’t perfect and can make mistakes.  I know the system can be political. Usually it’s by being too careful. With dicamba, it looks like the opposite happened.

    The reason we’re seeing dicamba leaf cupping everywhere isn’t because all applicators suddenly forgot how to spray. They didn’t suddenly get reckless. They didn’t wilfully ignore all the training that the dicamba manufacturers and state and provincial governments developed in preparation for the product launch.

    Instead, dicamba drift reports arose from a combination of extreme sensitivity and easily identified symptoms, as well as an unexpected (by some) amount of vapor drift. Even good applications appeared to create problems. Despite warnings from local experts, regulators and registrants didn’t see it coming.

    Experienced agronomists have suggested that the observed dicamba trespass of 2017 implicates both temperature inversions and vapor drift. And although the new product labels advise against spraying under inversion conditions, they don’t say a word about vapor drift, the conditions that give rise to it, or how to protect against its occurrence. Not one word. I’ve searched the XtendimaxEngenia and FeXapan labels. Nada.

    Seems that the regulators and registrants felt confident enough in the reduced volatility of dicamba, based on their internal empirical data and modeling, that they didn’t need to mention it on the label. Calling that a mistake is an understatement.

    I’d call it the biggest spray application misplay I’ve ever seen.

    A part of the problem may be the enormous scale on which this new use of dicamba was introduced, over 25 million acres of Xtend crops. Scale-up errors are common in many industries. Emergent properties related to scale can’t readily be predicted by empirical data and models. Especially when the underlying data are scant.

    So what to do? The continued success of agriculture depends to continued access to safe crop production tools. Irresponsible use threatens that. And by irresponsible use, I don’t just mean application. I also mean registration, promotion, sale, and support. The whole stewardship package.

    When problems occur, we need to be quick on our feet to acknowledge them, to support those affected, and to try to understand the cause and prevent the situation from continuing or getting worse.

    The current industry response appears to be the exact opposite. What I’ve seen is full of denial, downplaying, innuendo, blaming, and entrenchment.

    Why is such an important issue in pesticide stewardship handled so poorly?

    The immediate victims of this situation are the producers that depend on new technologies. But the long-term victim is agriculture as a whole. The lack of humility and leadership by many of the proponents of this technology, those with no small financial stake in its continued use, hurts not just them, but all of us involved in farming. This is not stewardship. It’s not license. It’s short sighted and reckless.

    Over my career, spray application has generally become safer for the operator and the environment. A big part of our success has been the adoption of low-drift nozzles, the de-facto standard for modern pesticide application. The development of less toxic and less persistent pesticides has also been very important. We can avoid a lot of problems with good chemistry. I’ve been proud to tell this story.

    I want to stay proud of our story. And in this case, that requires admitting to mistakes that were made and taking corrective action that is in the best interest of our entire industry. Agriculture will persist longer than company brands and titles. It takes priority.

    It’s still too early to fully understand all the reasons for the widespread dicamba damage. But it’s not too soon to say that much of this could have been prevented with a smaller rollout, with greater collaboration with government and university experts during registration, and with more honest information on dicamba volatility on product labels. Call it Volatility Humility.

    We’ll all pay for the mistakes that were made. We’ll likely have more stringent and expensive registration protocols. More restrictive application parameters. Strained relationships. More distrust of agriculture.

    And as always, an ounce of sweet prevention would have been much better than the pounds of bitter cure that will surely be required to make this right.

  • Question of the Week: Fine Sprays for Fungicides?

    Question of the Week: Fine Sprays for Fungicides?

    The following question arrived from one of our prairie clients last week:

    “A retailer is promoting the use of hollow cone nozzles to be used on field sprayers (20” spacing) to apply fungicides which he claims out-perform any regular and twin fan tips. Claims:

    • create an extra fine droplet for maximum coverage on the canopy
    • use less water, less time spent filling
    • apply at 3.5 gpa
    • add vegetable oil to reduce drift

    “So his direction to a specific customer was to use the TEEJET CONEJET TXA8001VK nozzle at  80 psi – travelling at 10 – 12 mph to achieve a 3.4 gpa application rate with a ‘very fine’ droplet size.

    “What are your thoughts?”

    Here’s how I answered (edited for clarity):

    That recommendation sounds familiar – it originates from a consultant with experience in South America, where this idea is promoted to improve (aerial) spray productivity.

    I fundamentally disagree with his approach. Adopting and promoting it is not only illegal (contravenes every modern label’s water volume and spray quality requirements), it also puts a generation’s worth of stewardship efforts on drift management at risk.

    To be balanced, let’s explore the attractiveness of this approach. Finer sprays do provide superior coverage and save water. Every child knows this. Finer sprays also go places in the canopy where the coarser sprays can’t, for example very dense lentil canopies.

    Over the years, we’ve explored the performance of fine fungicide sprays in canola, pulses, and cereals in research trials with the U of S and AAFC. To our surprise, droplet size played only a small role in fungicide performance. Water volume was much more important. Droplet size management with pressure through a low-drift nozzle was enough to get the best disease control.

    The main drawbacks of very fine sprays are:

    1. The fine droplets evaporate to dryness very quickly, in seconds. As they shrink, their drift potential is increased even more, and once dry, the remaining particles work much less well. The proponent corrects for this by adding an oily adjuvant as an evaporation retardant. With oil, the fines remain liquid much longer. Although many products become more effective this way, they also become more phytotoxic and less safe for the applicator and bystander. Completely off label, completely risky for crop safety, unknown effects on MRLs, extremely unsafe for the environment and humans. Remember when people dissolved 2,4-D ester in diesel, back in the 40s and 50s and sprayed it with their brass 6501 tips? That’s what this is.
    2. Cone nozzles are designed for airblast sprayers and do not produce good pattern overlaps for boom sprayers. The proponent of this method actually recommends that the boom be raised to overcome the bad patterns and to (believe it or not) simulate aerial application. If this were done, the spray would be re-distributed by air-currents and come down wherever the wind blows it. Probably far away.  The concept of on-target, uniform application, the practice that makes product use acceptable, and the thing we try to achieve with flat fans at a low boom height, is completely lost.
    3. Producers will not have the support of pesticide manufacturers should a performance issue arise. Even worse, if regulators find out about this off-label practice, significant fines (fines for fines, get it?) can be charged under the Pest Control Products Act.
    4. Airborne spray drift with an air-induced spray like the AirMix, GuardianAir, AIXR and the like, applying 10 gpa, is about 1% of the applied amount, measured at 5 m downwind of the downwind edge of the swath in a 20 km/h wind. We’ve never measured hollow cone drift from a boom sprayer, but when we used a flat fan at 5 gpa, drift increased to about 8% of applied. I’d guess a high pressure hollow cone would easily double or triple that. Illegal and irresponsible.
    5. Travel and boom turbulence is a part of faster travel speeds. This would affect the finer droplets much more than the coarser ones, as we can imagine. It’s similar to drift. With a low-drift spray, the proportion of the total spray volume that is “fine”, say less than 150 microns, is about 5%. For a very fine hollow cone, it might by 50 to 75%. So a much greater proportion of the sprayed dosage would be susceptible to uncontrollable movement. This could be good, when turbulence redirects the spray to places that are unreachable by larger droplets. Or it could be bad, as turbulence pushes droplets away from an important target, creating a miss. On balance, bad. Very bad.

    These types of recommendations are concocted by people who want to tell a unique story that is popular with some. Their approach differentiates them from the rest of the crowd, an old and effective marketing trick. But these proponents do not have the best interests of the industry in mind.

    Our individual and collective agricultural practices must be respectful of others. Of safety. Of the law. Of the environment. We have lots of opportunities to make shortcuts…nobody’s watching most of the time. But that doesn’t make it right. It’s certainly not in ag’s long-term interest.

    When considering our agricultural practices, imagine describing them to a young non-farming person. Can you justify your actions? Do your practices make you proud? If not, you have work to do.

    Here’s a task: If your boom sprayer has nozzles that produce very fine sprays, take them off and throw them in the garbage. Might sound radical, but it’s the right thing to do.