Category: General Operation

Articles that discuss general field sprayer operation and productivity factors

  • The Label Summary Sheet Proposal

    The Label Summary Sheet Proposal

    We’ve identified and discussed shortcomings in the content and design of today’s pesticide labels in an earlier article. From the perspective of the spray applicator, the information needed most often can be difficult to locate, anachronistic, contradictory, subjective or even missing from the label altogether. To truly encourage an applicator to read and follow the label we need a consistent, concise and clear format that summarizes critical content.

    To that end, we have worked with growers, university/government extension and industry to develop a prototype we’re calling the “Label Summary Sheet”, or LSS for short. We presented the concept in a series of public presentations in western Canada as part of the RealAgriculture TechTour Live event in 2018. You can watch a recording of part of that event at the end of this article.

    The LSS does not replace or interpret the current label, which is a legal document. It is a summary intended to accompany it. At this stage the LSS is simply a proposal. These documents are not intended for use right now; we hope they will grow and change for the better as they stimulate discussion.

    Consider this metaphor: You have just purchased a laptop. When you unbox it, you get an in-depth instruction guide that covers everything from operation to trouble shooting and includes all the legal riders. It’s a daunting technical document that you likely won’t read unless something goes wrong. Knowing that, manufacturers include a graphic and accessible quick start-up guide that summarizes the most common and critical issues. It doesn’t replace the instruction manual, it just augments it. If you can’t find what you need in the quick start-up guide, you are referred to the more fulsome description in the instruction manual. Think of the pesticide label as the instruction manual and the LSS as the quick start-up guide.

    Some agrichemcial companies recognize this need and have developed short documents to summarize key aspects of the label, but they are inconsistent and brand-specific marketing documents that do not always contain the information we are proposing. Here, for example, is the technology sheet for Integrity herbicide.

    We tested the versatility of our LSS format by summarizing four diverse pesticide labels. Our selections are not intended to imply that these labels are particularly deficient. Only that they are commonly used, somewhat complicated and represent the spectrum of pesticide categories and application methods.

    Download and look at the variety of labels we have summarized as examples. They are available here:

    • Pristine (LSS: 3 pages. Pesticide Label: 25 pages)
    • Dual II Magnum (LSS: 3 pages. Pesticide Label: 38 pages)
    • Liberty 150 (LSS: 2 pages. Pesticide Label 20 pages)
    • Traxos (LSS: 2 pages. Pesticide Label: 12 pages)

    Note that each LSS features the same section headings and a relatively consistent layout, no matter the manufacturer. Generic icons are used to illustrate content and make it easier for users to navigate without language barriers. The LSS are black and white to facilitate reproduction and refer back to their respective pesticide labels (i.e. the online PDF, not the booklets that come with the pesticides).

    LSS Sections

    Here is the Pristine LSS broken down by section to highlight the key features.

    1. Banner Section

    The banner is at the top of every LSS. It gives the commercial product name and the date to ensure the LSS reflects the current pesticide label. Four icons represent the most common application technologies: Horizontal boom sprayer, airblast, aerial and handheld. If an application method is prohibited, a banned symbol appears (such as aerial in this case). Note we have left room for RPAAS (UAV’s) anticipating the day we have products registered for that technology. The table notes the type of pesticide (e.g. fungicide, insecticide, adjuvant, etc.). The mode of action and active ingredient(s) are noted, as well as the formulation and the Pest Control Product number.

    2. Resistance Management / Planting Restrictions

    Intended to provide key information on managing pesticide resistance, this section reflects label content about carry over and the rotation of active ingredients. Further, to aid in application decisions, it reflects any restrictions around maximum number of applications, sequential applications or plant back issues following use.

    3. Environmental Conditions


    Any restrictions regarding weather conditions during or after application are noted here. This includes set-backs or buffer zones that reflect method of application and the nature of the adjacent or downwind area in question.

    4. Sprayer Settings

    This section includes the six most commonly asked questions an applicator has when calibrating or adjusting their sprayer prior to use. It is organized by target crop and method of application. When the label provides a high level of detail, the user is referred to the correct page. Note the use of graphics to quickly direct the reader to the information they need. Any additional qualifications found in the label relating to sprayer settings are indicated in the notes beneath the table.

    5. Handling Safety (PPE)

    The concept for this simple and graphic table originated in France, and was communicated to us by Dr. Carol Black of Washington State University. This unambiguous  format encourages the use of PPE while ensuring the handler uses the appropriate level of protection for each activity.

    6. Mixing


    As operators tank mix more products to curtail resistance, improve efficacy or improve productivity, there is a greater chance of chemical or physical incompatibility. This section summarizes any restrictions noted in the label. Learn more by downloading Purdue Universities’ publication “Avoid Tank Mixing Errors“.

    7. Rates and Restricted Entry Intervals

    This table can be quite complicated depending on the pesticide label. It summarizes the rates, volumes and restricted entry intervals by crop. It reflects the broadest range of product rates listed in the label. Restricted entry duration is affected by the post application activity, and this is captured in the REI column. If more detail is required, the user is referred to the appropriate page(s) of the label. Any additional qualifications found in the label relating to rates, volumes or REI are indicated in the notes beneath the table.

    8. Equipment Cleanout

    Finally, equipment cleanout is summarized (where possible) in a sequence of steps. When the pesticide label is silent on the cleanout procedure, the user is provided with the triple rinse protocol, which is generally held to be the industry best-practice.

    Adoption

    To date, this proposal has been made to Croplife Canada, the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE), an International Organization for Standardization (ISO) mirror committee (Equipment for crop protection) and more than 1,400 growers and stakeholders across Canada.

    Our suggestion for adoption of the LSS (in its current form or something similar)  is that regulatory agencies commission a working group comprised of representatives from grower groups, industry and government to oversee the process. The working group would support registrants as they populate (or update) the LSS template when a new product is submitted for registration, or as part of the natural review cycle.

    Should the registrant encounter duplicate, missing or contradictory information while completing the LSS, it should be considered an opportunity to remedy the problem on the pesticide label. This will clarify the safest and most effective use of the pesticide for the applicator, who is currently forced to selectively ignore or interpret such errors. To our minds, this was the intent of the original labelling system, and the inclusion of the LSS is a simple and effective way to achieve that goal.

    The Confusicol Sketch

    In 2018 we participated in Real Agriculture’s TechTour Live event that toured four major cities in Western Canada in four days. We presented the “Confusicol sketch” as a light-hearted way to open a discussion with the audience on the strengths and weaknesses of Canadian pesticide labels and how the Label Summary Sheet might be a viable supplement. Here’s one of the live takes, warts and all. Turns out live sketch comedy is tricky…

  • Dealing with Pesticide Shortages in 2022

    Dealing with Pesticide Shortages in 2022

    We’ve had dire warnings about possible pesticide shortages and price hikes for 2022. Price hikes are one thing. But if the products we need simply won’t be available, we have a tougher challenge.  It’s time to plan pesticide conservation.

    But first, what’s behind the product shortage?

    Emily Unglesby of dtnpf.com provided an excellent overview of the issue here and here. She said the reasons for the shortage are many-fold and came together in a perfect storm. Starting about 2017 or so, pesticide manufacturers tried to reduce the overall inventory of products to improve logistical efficiencies.  That effort was rewarded in 2019 when a wet spring in the US dramatically reduced seeded area to a low of 165 M acres. The resulting lower demand again provided incentives to reduce inventories. At the same time, US trade sanctions against China in the form of tariffs impacted production and shipment of many active ingredients to US markets. When Covid-19 happened, it affected both production and shipping of many goods, including pesticides. Container shipment costs increased sharply, and the ability to move them to and from ports was hampered. This then coincided with record seeded area in the US of 180 M acres in 2021, creating higher than usual demand. By that time, very little buffer remained in the system. The growth of Enlist E3 and Xtend Flex has placed additional pressure on glufosinate.

    Then two further events occurred. Hurricane Ida forced a shutdown of Bayer’s Louisiana glyphosate plant. And China, in late 2021, legislated a temporary 90% reduction of yellow phosphorus production in Yunnan Province in anticipation of the 2022 Olympic Winter Games. With phosphorus as a fundamental ingredient in glyphosate, glufosinate, and some fertilizers, this loss of production places significant strain on many products. The usual habit of returning unused pesticides to the retailer also became less common amidst shortage news, adding difficulty to planning inventories and demand.

    Shortages of popular herbicides like glyphosate, glufosinate, and clethodim will put demand on alternatives. Spreading out risk by implementing pre-emergent products where possible will pay dividends. But the ability to ramp up production of minor products is just as dependent on the supply chain, and these alternatives may therefore not offer reprieve if ordering is left to the bitter end. Planning ahead and staying in touch with retailers about your plans and your own inventory will assist the entire system in managing production and redistributing existing stocks.

    Safe to say products will be more expensive, and possibly impossible to obtain. Here are some things to consider to minimize the impact.

    1.Grow crops that require less pesticides. Crops which have good genetic resistance to insects and disease will be more likely to cope without a protective spray. Some crops are inherently competitive early on and give less time and space for weeds to become established. Remember that the relative time of emergence is important for crop yield loss from weeds. If crops emerge before weeds, they have the upper hand and will maintain higher yield potential. Crops that can be seeded early will prevent weeds from occupying that niche.

    A competitive crop is the best herbicide.

    2. The most powerful herbicide is a competitive crop. Use agronomic tools that favour good seedling establishment. The usual advice of seeding into a warm, firm, moist seedbed, should we be fortunate enough for the weather to cooperate, applies here. There is value in higher seeding rates to help outcompete weeds. Use fertilizer placement that favours crops, not weeds, such as side banding.

    3. Sample the spray water source and have it professionally tested. After a record drought in western North America, aquifers are low and surface waters have receded. Water quality will probably not be the same it has historically been. Use water conditioners to reduce effect of hard cations and bicarbonates. Ammonium Sulphate (21-0-0-24) at 1% w/v is a general treatment, harder water may require up to 3%.

    Conduct a water test in 2022 and condition spray water if necessary.

    4. Do not use untested mixes of pesticides with specialty foliar fertilizers. These may impact herbicide performance, or worse, result in an incompatible mix.

    5. Use the lowest label rate of product that is relevant for the pest you’re trying to control. Many products have a range of rates depending on the weed species and stage. Scout your fields and take advantage of the lower rate option if you can.

    Invest in logistics and be prepared to respond to a good spray day to get the timing right.

    6. Spray herbicides early. It’s been shown that crop plants can sense the presence of weeds before they compete for resources, causing a physiological adjustment that results in irreversible yield loss. The shorter the time that weeds and crops co-exist, the better. Also, smaller weeds are easier to control. Weeds that escape this early application will need to compete with an established crop and won’t thrive or impact yield as much.

    Smaller weeds are easier to control and may allow a lower label rate.

    7. It’s not advisable to reduce product rates from the one recommended on the label. Although label rates contain a margin for poor conditions, the risk of selecting for polygenic resistance exists. Polygenic resistance occurs when some weeds happen to be slightly more tolerant to the herbicide than the rest of their cohort. These weeds may survive a lower rate, and go on to produce seeds. If these outcross with other survivors, their more tolerant offspring will increase in relative abundance. With further such selections in subsequent generations, weeds become even more tolerant and eventually dominate.

    8. Apply the spray as uniformly as possible. Make sure the spray nozzles are within a 5% flow rate tolerance along the entire boom. If the set is older, consider a wholesale replacement. But the biggest enemy of uniform deposition seems to be turbulence created by wind and driving speed around the tractor unit. Slower wind and travel speeds help somewhat. Variable deposition means that some regions receive up to 50% more than intended, and others receive 50% less. This means weeds in the lower deposit regions may survive the application. The more variable the application, the higher the rate that is needed for acceptable control.

    Slower travel speed reduces variability of the spray deposit, limiting escapes.

    9. Use finer sprays whenever the tank mix contains a contact mode of action product (e.g., Group 1, 6, 10, 14, 15, 22, 27) or targets grassy weeds. Both situations require smaller droplets for best performance. The use of finer sprays may mean fewer hours in the day when drift is acceptable, and as a result, investment in efficient tendering and cleaning as well as overall time management pays dividends.

    10. Make efficient use of the product in the tank, preventing waste. The amount of product being discarded can range to over 10% of the total needed to treat a field, but this can be reduced to 3% with the proper steps. The following are areas where improvement is possible:

    (a) Prime the boom efficiently using sectional shutoffs or better yet, a recirculating boom. These can be primed without any spray leaving the nozzle or boom ends.

    Conserve product by eliminating priming waste with a recirculating boom.

    (b) Measure the spray mix of the last tank accurately, minimizing leftover. Consider the AccuVolume system that weighs the tank contents to the closest gallon. Tanks can be filled with the exact amount, and rates can be adjusted as the leftover becomes apparent on the last passes.

    Accurate measurement of tank volumes prevents leftovers.

    (c) Invest in individual nozzle shutoffs to improve sectional control resolution. These are part of any Pulse Width Modulation system but can also be obtained as air-actuated valves that are very affordable. Such capability is necessary for recirculating booms.

    Nozzle sectional control can save 4 to 5% product use.

    14. Consider an optical spot spray system such as the WEEDit Quadro, the Trimble WeedSeeker, or the John Deere See & Spray Select, available for 2022. These systems are “Green on Brown”, meaning they selectively spray just weeds in a burnoff or chem-fallow. This can save about 70% of the spray depending on weed density. More such systems are on the way, some even offering “Green on Green” that selectively identifies weeds among a crop. The return on investment of these systems is directly related to the pesticide cost, meaning in a year with high pesticide prices they pay off faster. If shortages of product become a reality, a spot sprayer may be the only way that some fields get treated at all.

    Pesticide shortages will not be fun. Unfortunately, their appearance coincides with higher fertilizer prices, meaning crop establishment will need to overcome that factor as well. But there are tools to minimize the impact if we’re willing to implement them. Just as necessity is the mother of invention, scarcity is the father of conservation.

  • Broadcast Boom Nozzle Spacing

    Broadcast Boom Nozzle Spacing

    North American built boom sprayers have nozzle spacings of 20” (50 cm in the rest of the world), but other spacings such as 15” (37 cm) and 10” (25 cm) also exist. What are the reasons for these alternative spacings and do they offer any inherent advantages?

    Why spacing matters

    Nozzles are spaced along a boom to allow their fans (patterns) to overlap sufficiently at the target. In broadcast spraying, a uniform distribution of spray volume gives us the best chance for consistent coverage along the boom. Since flat fan nozzles produce a tapered pattern (i.e. the volume is highest in the centre and diminishes towards the edges), approximately 100% overlap (i.e. 50% from each neighbour) will produce a uniform swath.

    Figure 1: Tapered flat fans that require some overlap are the default pattern type for agricultural boom nozzles. This is true of conventional and low-drift styles. Note that the flat fans are turned 15° to prevent the spray patterns from interfering with one another.

    The 100% overlap isn’t just for volumetric distribution. Flat fan spray patterns tend to have more and finer droplets in the centre and fewer and coarser droplets at the edges. All droplet sizes contribute to coverage in different ways, so the overlap ensures both number and sizes are evenly distributed along the entire boom.

    Figure 2: 30% overlap may achieve volumetric uniformity. But because the centre of the pattern contains the majority of the smaller droplets, low overlap may result in low coverage in the overlap regions, resulting in striping.
    Figure 3: Consistent droplet number distribution along the boom requires at minimum 100% overlap (50% from each neighbouring nozzle). This blends those regions of the patterns with high and low droplet densities.

    The generic 20” spacing arose from long-held conventions about boom height, fan angle, and travel speed. Specifically, this spacing required a boom height of 20” to obtain good overlap of the once-dominant 80° fan angle. Combined with 0.15 to 0.3 US gallon per minute (gpm) nozzles and travel speeds of 6 to 8 mph, operators were able to apply 5 to 15 US gallons per acre (gpa) volumes. Using nozzles with smaller flow rates would generally result in nozzle blockages.

    But what if we want to change any of those variables? How does this affect nozzle spacing? Figuring out the pros and cons of an alternate spacing requires a little math and some contingency management.

    Boom Height Math

    First the math. If the boom has 20” nozzle spacing and we need 100% overlap, the width of the spray pattern at target height must be two times the nozzle spacing, which is 40″. You must calculate the required fan angle and boom height to achieve this. Most nozzle catalogues have tables to help with this, or you can download a handy spreadsheet to calculate your own scenarios here.

    For today’s standard 110° fans, a minimum boom height of 14” is needed to achieve 100% overlap. For 15” spacing, the height is reduced to 11”. For 10” spacing, we drop to a mere 7”. However, consider that most modern suspended booms are not operated at heights less than 24” to allow for sway. At that height, there’s plenty of overlap to go around for 20″ nozzle spacing. For those booms that are able to operate at a consistent height, narrower spacings permit lower heights that will reduce drift potential significantly. Every time we halve boom height, we also halve drift potential.

    Figure 4: Using 110° tips with 20″ spacing, the theoretical height at which we achieve 50% overlap is 11″ above target.

    By tilting the nozzles forward or backward from the vertical, we can reduce the boom height somewhat further and still get the same overlap. For example, for 20 and 15” spacings, angling nozzles forward or backwards by 30° allows us to drop the boom another 2” closer to the target.

    Contingencies

    A suspended boom hardly ever stays at a uniform height; It sways up and down with field conditions, topography, etc. This is why many operators set their booms above the minimum height – to prevent striping when the boom sways low. The penalty is that this increases the distance droplets need to travel, increasing drift potential and any turbulent displacement problems arising from the moving boom.

    Assuming a 110° flat fan at 24” boom height, each nozzle achieves a theoretical pattern width of about 70”, which is an overlap of 70÷20=3.4-fold or 240% on 20” nozzle spacing. Given a minimally-acceptable overlap of 50% (25% from each neighbouring nozzle), the boom could be as low as 11”. For 15” spacing, the minimum height for 50% overlap is 8”, and for 10” spacing it’s 5”. This means the narrower spray patterns gain 3” to 6” in allowed downward boom movement.

    Figure 5: Using 110° tips on 15″ spacing, the height for 50% overlap is 8″ above target.

    A second contingency is that spray patterns are rarely the exact value that the nozzle catalogues specify. A so-called 110° nozzle may operate at only 90°, or up to 150°, depending on the nozzle model, the spray pressure, and the tank mix. Learn more here and here. Patterns also don’t continue to grow at their rated fan angle, as droplets slow due to air-resistance and fall more vertically due to gravity. For that reason, a visual check is recommended to ensure the expected overlap is achieved.

    Figure 6: Fan angles indicate initial trajectories of droplets at the edge. With distance, gravity pulls these droplets downward, narrowing the pattern width from that achieved theoretically (figure adapted from image in TeeJet catalogue).

    A third issue to consider is less related to boom height but nonetheless affects spray distribution. Small droplets move with air currents, and the turbulence created by large, fast sprayers creates enough turbulence to move these droplets significantly. A perfect pattern under static conditions can look quite different at a fast travel speed with a modest side wind. Low booms may help prevent some of this displacement because droplets spend less time in flight, and their average velocity is faster.

    Figure 7: Spray deposition onto a 2 mm string to measure deposit uniformity for a fast travel speed and high boom and a slow speed, low boom configuration.

    Flow Rate Math

    Flow rate requirements per nozzle change whenever we equip a boom at an alternate spacing. The basic formulae are shown below.

    Moving from a 20″ to a 15″ spacing would require a nozzle with 0.75 of the flow rate, approximately from a 02 to 015 size, or 03 to a 025 size, or 04 to 03 size, etc.

    Pulse Width Modulation

    The use of Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) has increased the overlap requirement. With PWM, alternate nozzles are on a 180° timing offset from their neighbours. This means that when running >50% duty cycle, when one nozzle is temporarily off, its neighbours are on. These neighbours’ patterns must now span the gap, and 100% overlap is the absolute minimum to achieve this. PWM users therefore select the wider pattern angles and some opt for >100% overlap.

    Figure 8: Pulse Width Modulated booms require 200% overlap so that the entire boom receives proper coverage when the alternate set of nozzles is off. For 110° fans at 20″ spacing, the minimum boom height would be 21″

    PWM Considerations

    • High flows (greater than 1 US gpm at the nozzle) that are common for fertilizer top-dressing may require higher-flow PWM valves.
    • Narrow spacings reduce the individual nozzle flow rates and can therefore support higher application rates before triggering a larger valve requirement.
    • PWM valves aren’t cheap and for example 15″ spacing compared to 20″ spacing adds 24 valves on a 120′ boom.

    Banding

    We noted that 20” nozzle spacing is a standard because it corresponds to what has traditionally been achievable with available boom heights and spray pattern angles. But things can change.

    Narrower spacings such as 15” originate with row crops and planter row spacings of 15” or 30”. These spacings exist so the spray pattern can be placed either over the top of a crop row, or in between the rows for banding. Using narrower fan angles and/or lower boom heights, together with “even” (as opposed to “tapered”) fans, banding sprays can be applied over the top of, or between crop rows. Or drop hoses can reach between the rows for top-dressing or directed sprays into the canopy.

    Canopy Penetration

    With narrower spacing, it can be argued that a greater proportion of the boom length has spray directed directly downward (corresponding to the centre of the pattern). Whether or not this translates into better penetration of a canopy is a fair question. In laboratory trials, use of 10” or 20” spacing did not improve penetration into a broadleaf canopy. But if the lower boom height afforded by the narrower spacing was utilized, some improvements in the deposit of angled sprays onto vertical targets was observed.

    Adjusting to Narrower Spacings

    As we showed earlier, use of 15” or 10” spacing booms for broadcast sprays requires a smaller nozzle size to achieve the same spray volumes as the 20” spacing. If boom height remains constant, narrower spacings result in greater pattern overlap which provides more latitude for sway. Alternately, lower boom heights can be used.

    Using smaller nozzles on narrower spacing presents some challenges. Generally, smaller nozzle size means finer spray quality. If an operator wants to retain the spray quality they had on a 20″ spacing, they may opt to use lower pressure (not advisable for non-PWM systems) or swap to different nozzle design that can produce the desired spray quality at the lower flow rate.

    Smaller nozzles are more prone to plugging, so that needs to be managed with filtration, filling practices and water sourcing. Be aware of the the product formulations and their requirements for filter mesh size. Most dry products specify a 50 mesh filter (or coarser). Also, check size options for nozzles. The smallest size for most nozzle models is 015, but certain PWM-specific nozzles are only available in 03 or larger.

    The marriage of narrow spacings with individual nozzle shutoff can result in a versatile system capable of producing high resolution banded sprays in narrow seeded crops. For example, consider a boom with a 10” nozzle spacing spacing that matches the seeder row spacing. The operator can shift from 10” to 20” or 30” from the cab if the valve control software allows it. With accurate guidance and good boom levelling, topdressing foliar products (e.g. nutrients, fungicides) can follow the crop row precisely.

    Spot Sprays

    Spot sprays present a situation where compromises are needed. Some, such as WEEDit, utilize narrower nozzle spacings to allow better treatment resolution and increase product savings. Any one nozzle or sets of adjacent nozzles may be triggered by the sensor. For single nozzle activation, to preserve the value of the better resolution a uniform, narrow band of spray needs to be created. This means a 30° or 40° fan angle from a banding nozzle will be necessary. For example, a 24” boom height will result in a 13” band with a 30° fan, and an 18” band with a 40° fan. In the latter case, the dose would be diluted by 80%, wasting much of the potential savings.

    Figure 10: Boom height is critical for banded sprays and for spot sprays. Too wide a pattern on a single nozzle reduces dose, too narrow creates misses.

    Frequently, a patch of weeds will trigger several adjacent nozzles. Now these individual bands need to work together to create a uniform swath. This will inevitably require some overlap to avoid gaps, but too much overlap will result in bands where twice the dose will be applied. A tapered fan may suit this situation better. As a result of these varying needs, tolerances for spot spray boom height are even more strict than for broadcast spraying. More thoughts on spot spray nozzle selection are here.

    Conclusions

    Narrower nozzle spacings on a broadcast boom allow somewhat lower boom heights and these can in turn reduce drift and improve deposition of sprays. Lower flow nozzles will be needed with narrower spacings, requiring management of plugging and potentially a more drift-prone spray quality. The value of narrower spacings depends on the availability of booms that control sway, allowing them to operate at uniform, low heights.

  • Adventures in Lecturing – Turn Off PowerPoint

    Adventures in Lecturing – Turn Off PowerPoint

    Harvest is mostly done and growers want to hear what we’ve learned and what’s coming next. Lecture season is upon us once again.

    In 2021 we’re still finding our way through virtual conferences and hybrid models, but I like to think we’re slowly returning to the in-person format. Just last week I gave my first in-person talk in 20 months. It felt wonderful after having spoken into a dead-eyed camera for so long. Half-way through my lecture I remembered a lesson I learned a few years back and spontaneously decided to go off-script.

    Let me explain.

    In 2016 I was invited to present at the 40th annual Tomato Days conference in Southern Ontario. I knew what I wanted to say, but didn’t have a decent slide deck for that particular topic. I’d have to pull one together.

    I work hard on my presentations. I employ lots of imagery (I create all my own illustrations). I get persnickety about fonts, white space and slide transitions. I try to tell a story that educates and hopefully, entertains. Prideful? Perhaps. But if you’re willing to sit on a hard chair for an hour, I’m going to do my best to make it worth your while.

    I finished the slide deck, drove three hours to the conference, handed my USB data key to the organizers and sat down to wait my turn. It was a clear, bright winter morning and I saw that the pavilion we were in was more-or-less windows and a roof. It was so bright, in fact, that none of the 150 attendees could see the projector screen!

    I watched sympathetically as the first speaker spent 30 minutes trying (and failing) to verbally describe his graphs. I cringed as the second speaker pantomimed her illustrations in some kind of brave, interpretive dance. Then it was my turn.

    I decided I wasn’t going down that road.

    When the moderator brought up my talk, I turned the useless projector off. I asked the squirming and disinterested audience:

    Q. “What’s the most terrifying thing you can do to an academician?”
    A.     “Take their Power Point away.”

    For the next 30 minutes we had a discussion about spray coverage. No props. No slides. The audience slowly warmed up to the new format. They shared experiences. They debated. They asked questions. I became more facilitator than speaker.

    When our time was up I think everyone was pleased. Sure, I missed a lot of my key points and never really addressed the subjects I thought I would, but who cares? Everyone learned something.

    For me, I learned that speakers should abandon the script every now and again. It’s not always ideal since we’re there to teach and structured visuals are often required. But, the next time you’re asked to speak, consider the possibility of using your time to engage your audience and establish a dialogue… not just talk at them until the moderator gives you the 5-minute warning.

    I have a colleague who does this masterfully. Whenever he is the last speaker on the agenda, and the previous speakers have discourteously gone over-time and whittled his time in half, he jumps straight to his take-home slide. He leads a quick discussion with the audience and becomes a hero. The moderators are now back on schedule and no one is late for lunch.

    Since “Tomato Days”, I now try to do this once a year. I never know when the mood will take me, but when it does I give the audience a choice: They can hear my canned presentation or I can shut it down and we can have a conversation. To date, given the option, every audience has opted to go off script. It’s scary, it’s fun and like I said earlier, everyone learns something.

    I challenge you to try it the next time you’re lucky enough to be in front of an audience in person.

  • Horsch Leeb sprayer gives people what they want with 6.300 VL model

    Horsch Leeb sprayer gives people what they want with 6.300 VL model

    Theodor Leeb started building self-propelled sprayers in Bavaria, Germany in 2001 and formed a partnership with Horsch LLC in 2011 (Horsch has been selling tillage and seeding equipment in North America since 2001 and has 17 dealers in the prairie provinces). The resulting company, Horsch Leeb Application Systems GmbH, is headquartered in Landau a.d. Isar, about 120 km NE of Munich. There they build pull-type and self-propelled sprayers, employ 350 staff, and had sales of approximately $80 M USD in 2019.

    This is no Johnny come lately to the sprayer scene.

    Their current flagship sprayer in North America is the Horsch Leeb 6.300 VL. I spent a day with Mike Wasylyniuk, Product Marketing Manager for Horsch, in Crossfield, Alberta to look it over.

    The Numbers

    The sprayer chassis holds a 1700 US gallon stainless steel tank and two 100 gallon clean water tanks for a total liquid capacity of 1900 gallons. A stainless steel Pentair Hypro centrifugal pump provides the flow to the boom, and a second pump is dedicated to the clean water tanks. The sprayer is powered by a familiar FPT 6.7 L producing 310 hp. The boom is 120’ wide in 5 articulated sections with 10’ nozzle spacing fitted with Raven Hawkeye Pulse Width Modulation (PWM). Top spraying speed is 20 mph, top transport is 30 mph. Horsch claims a dry weight of 32,000 lbs when fitted with Goodyear LSW 900 50R46.

    The Horsch Leeb 6.300 VL near Crossfield, AB October 2021.

    A central tubular frame creates room for four-wheel steer that has an interior turning radius of 3 m. Wheels are suspended via hydropneumatics linked to the frame with double wishbones. Track width adjusts from 120″ to 160″, independently, allowing different track widths front and rear without pinning an axle in place. Standing beside the front wheel, one has with easy access to fuel and oil filters, the radiator is on top of the machine facing up with an air-chuck outlet for cleaning.

    Four wheel steer improves maneuverability but more importantly, reduces front wheel plowing and allows use of common wheel track in headland turns.

    Plumbing

    Any loyal reader of Sprayers101 knows that we believe the biggest room for improvement in spraying is in the plumbing. Horsch Leeb seems aware of this. First, it does away with sight tubes on the tank and relies on a more accurate digital float that reads down to an empty tank. Tank slope position is considered using a gyro mounted at the rear of the sprayer. The tank can be filled with the solution pump or from the tender truck using 3” side or front fill locations. It has auto shutoff when a target amount is reached. As is common, the majority of valves are motor operated to allow automation.

    Fill station on right side of sprayer contains a 3″ fill connection as well as a 2″ drain

    The recirculating boom plumbing is standard North American 1” OD stainless steel to suit any off the shelf nozzle body clamp. It pressurizes from both ends when spraying and returns to tank from the outside of the boom when nozzles shut off or when priming or flushing. The recirculation can run during transport, allowing boom priming en-route to the field, or continuous flushing with a cleaning solution in the main tank on the way home.

    Recirculating boom feed and return lines are standard 1″ OD stainless steel.

    The second pump, an Italian Annovi Reverberi 185 BP diaphragm, powers the continuous cleaning function. It draws from the clean water tank and can push this water to the boom for overnight storage when the tank has solution left, or to the tank’s wash-down nozzles for a continuous clean at the end of a job. In continuous clean mode, the solution pump continues to supply the boom while the cleaning water washes the walls and dilutes the remainder. The tank and boom can be washed with a minimum of liquid, and the process is automated using cab or side monitor controls.

    Dedicated to the clean water tanks, this diaphragm pump can push water to the boom, to the wash-down
    Stainless tank with baffle

    The system even has a winterizing button that controls all the necessary valves to distribute antifreeze from the clean water tanks throughout the plumbing system in minutes. Remaining antifreeze in the tank can be returned to the drum at the fill station with a convenient camlock drain.

    Readout of tank levels and pump pressure via the external monitor. Priming, cleaning and winterizing routines are available.

    Some may gloss over plumbing paragraphs in haste, but let’s not underestimate the magnitude of these features. We are talking about a plumbing system that can prime the boom without spraying, spray the field, then spray out any remainder while rinsing the tank, air purge the boom, then rinse the boom without leaving the cab or wasting material unnecessarily. Even the system strainers have flush capability that returns any residue to a removable fine mesh filter before the liquid dumps back to the tank. Such a design saves time and money and pays in acres per hour.

    Boom

    The 120’ boom is well built and has channels for wiring harnesses that are neatly zip-tied in place. An aluminum shield covers the nozzle bodies at the front to protect them from any ground contact.  Access is relatively convenient through ports on the other side. The fitted triple nozzle bodies should be enough to suit most needs. The swing-away has a sturdy steel tube on the leading edge to absorb and deflect any sudden impact. There is no exposed plastic. The recirculating boom plumbing is stainless steel throughout except at hinges, where the rubber hose loop is protected from chafing by an additional sleeve.

    The sturdy boom is shielded where the nozzles are mounted to protect them from impact. Note the vertical hinge that permits improved contour-following.
    The break-away section has additional protection via a stainless steel pipe that absorbs and deflects impact.
    Access to the 10″ spaced nozzles and PWM solenoids is via the rear of the boom.

    The Leeb philosophy is to design sprayers that control drift at the source without reliance on extremely coarse sprays that can hamper efficiency. They’ve chosen boom height as the key variable and built the boom to make this possible. First, they needed to design a system that can reliably hold the boom low and level.

    Low, uniform boom height for drift reduction is the stated goal of the Horsch Leeb sprayer

    To that end, three pivot points are used to provide independence of the tractor unit and the boom. The first is at the centre rack from which the boom hangs but can pivot thanks to the same gyro that helps read the tank level. A sudden tractor movement due to ruts, for example, can then be compensated. The wings are the second pivot point (as it is for all sprayers), and a third point is halfway out the wings, where a hinge allows for up or down adjustments to better suit the land contour.

    A giro, visible just above the backup camera, monitors the tractor aspect relative to the boom.
    The vertical boom pivot can help prevent unnecessarily high boom ends or ground strikes.

    The height sensors have a modest look ahead slant, and the company claims that 8” boom height at 10 mph is possible. We certainly tried that in the field, and after multiple runs up and down a local field with modest knolls we did not strike ground, although the boom ends did rise significantly on occasion. The claim of such low booms will be a point of considerable testing and debate.

    Eight sensors provide boom height feedback.

    To take advantage of the low heights, narrower 10″ nozzle spacings are needed. The boom therefore has 144 nozzles instead of the usual 72, each half the flow rate. This is new territory for PWM, where the smaller tips are not as widely available. For example, a traditional 5 gpa tip at 20” and 12 mph is 03 in size, with 10” spacing this is now 015.  Smaller sizes require more attention to filtering, and they have inherently greater drift potential. This would only be a problem at the lower application rates.

    Because PWM allows for individual nozzle control, the operator can select 20” spacing, based on either of the 10” positions. This means one can spray with 20” spacing and then switch to a different nozzle simply by selecting the alternate.

    The lower boom height can offer unique advantages. The first of these is drift control. Droplets emerge from the tip at about 70 km/h, and this initial speed prevents even the small ones from drifting. The higher the boom, the more they slow down before targetting, creating drift potential. Wind speeds also tend to be lower nearer to the ground.

    Second, the beneficial effects of twin fans or angled single tips are greater with low booms. Readers will know that one of the fundamental prerequisites for successful angled sprays in Fusarium head blight (FHB), for example, are low booms. We may be in for some positive outcomes.

    The User Experience

    The Class cab has the usual creature comforts with a buddy seat, four cup holders, bluetooth radio and a phone mount. It can be fitted with any ISOBUS monitor, the one we had was equipped with the Raven Viper 4. The climb up the ladder is not as stair-like as the North American sprayers, but the treads are large and there are plenty of handholds so you can climb one-handed and bring your lunch or toddler along for the day.

    There is one native Horsch monitor that controls the chassis, wheel spacing, engine specs, speed, etc. It’s controlled using a rotary button selector like the one in many cars, a wheel that highlights items by turning, then selects them with a push. The second, an ISOBUS monitor, handles the rate control and thus creates easy compatibility with a variety of aftermarket monitors.

    The joystick is backlit and buttons can be customized. Like the Fendt stick, a push forward sets the speed and it can return to the neutral position without changing that speed. A pull back is required to slow down.  It takes a bit of getting used to. Motion can also be foot operated with a speed pedal and foot brake.  Cruise control has two preset speeds, and boom height can be raised to preset values when the master switch is shut off to facilitate a headland turn. The top two thumb buttons are Master on/off and autosteer resume.

    There is no throttle control. The sprayer decides how much throttle is needed to maintain speed, saving noise and fuel when it can. Throttling up was noticeable as we climbed hills during our test drive, returning to lower rpm as we descended while maintaining our cruise control speed.

    Some touches

    • a hand wash station at the ladder to prevent contaminating the hand-holds or cab
    • a camera focused on the centre rack nozzles that are invisible from the cab
    • cameras showing front wheel position
    • mud guards behind rear wheels to protect boom
    • Rain cover over electronics mounted on centre rack
    • A clean underbelly with good clearance and tow hooks front and back
    • Inductive (wireless) phone charging mount

    Overall Impression

    It’s clear that Horsch Leeb wants to succeed in North America. I’ve hardly ever seen a company so bent on delivering what the market wants (for familiarity and compatibility) while delivering what it knows they need (like plumbing and drift control). Spending the day with Mike I learned how quickly the engineers and fabricators implemented his suggestions at the factory. That is perhaps the most promising aspect of all, a company that listens to its customers and continually evolves its product as a result.