The Pros & Cons of Aerial Application – Tips with Tom #10

Tips with Tom - Title
Key takeaways
  • Aerial application reduces field tracks and speeds spraying, but planes face the same spray challenges as ground rigs and are not miraculous.
  • Aircraft wing does not force droplets into canopy; low water volumes work sometimes but need correct nozzle, timing, and conditions.
  • Decide method by operation needs and cost; communicate clearly with applicator to avoid myths and get the results you expect.

This text was generated by OpenAI GPT 5 Mini

Hiring an aerial applicator means fewer tracks in the crop and often a quicker spray application, but spray planes are not miraculous, says Tom Wolf. In fact, they deal with a lot of the same challenges as their well-grounded counterparts.

In this last installment of his 10 part series, Tom answers some of the most common questions around aerial applications, including:

  • “Does the aircraft wing generate a downforce that forces spray droplets into the canopy?”
  • “Is it thus that aerial spray applicators can apply such low water volumes?”
  • “Is it worth paying extra for a custom application from above?”

In addressing these questions, Tom corrects a few agricultural myths, provides tips for determining which method is better for your operation and emphasizes the importance of communication.

About the Author

Do More With This Article

Want to use this article in your own work? Print it or use our citation generator below.

Reference
Tom, Jason and. (2015). The Pros & Cons of Aerial Application – Tips with Tom #10. Sprayers 101. https://sprayers101.com/aerial-application/ (Accessed on April 23, 2026 at 08:20)

Search Sprayers 101

Search our archive of expert-written, data-driven analysis of spraying techniques, equipment, strategies, and more.