OrchardMAX won the 2016 Canadian Agri-Marketing Association’s “Certificate of Merit” in the Mobile Apps Category.
OrchardMAX is a free decision-support tool that helps apple growers match airblast sprayer output to the size, shape, and density of an orchard canopy.
Rather than applying the same volume and pesticide dose to every block throughout the season, OrchardMAX uses the principles of Crop-Adapted Spraying to estimate settings appropriate for each orchard block. The objective is more consistent spray coverage with less avoidable waste. Ontario and Nova Scotia orchard trials demonstrated seasonal spray-volume savings of approximately 20 to 35%, without significant differences in pest activity and reported or fruit quality.
What OrchardMAX does
Using information supplied by the operator, OrchardMAX can:
Account for changes in canopy size, shape, and density
Estimate an appropriate carrier volume and pesticide dose
Suggest nozzle flow rates and sprayer settings
Calculate the amount of formulated product required per tank
Estimate work rate, tank requirements, and potential savings
What OrchardMAX does not do
OrchardMAX is a decision-support tool, not a substitute for calibration, operator judgement, or the pesticide label. It will not:
Recommend a rate above the pesticide label
Calibrate the sprayer
Confirm that adequate spray coverage was achieved
Account fully for wind, temperature, or relative humidity
Recommend less than 400 L/ha, approximately 42.5 US gal/ac
Recommend less than half the labelled pesticide rate
The results are only as reliable as the information entered. Operators must still maintain and calibrate the sprayer, match air settings to the canopy, work in reasonable weather conditions and confirm coverage using water-sensitive paper.
How to use it
For each spray scenario:
Select or enter the sprayer and orchard block.
Describe the current canopy size, shape, and density.
Enter the labelled pesticide rate and planned spray mixture.
Review the proposed carrier volume, pesticide dose, nozzle rates, and number of tanks.
Configure and calibrate the sprayer.
Confirm the resulting coverage in the orchard and adjust where necessary.
Start with a few representative blocks. Compare OrchardMAX recommendations with your current program, evaluate coverage, and make incremental changes as you gain confidence.
History
The original app was an excel-based tool created in 2010 and later developed into an app for iOS and Android systems by AgNition Inc. with funding from Growing Forward 2 in 2016. Compatibility with iOS and Android ended in 2020. We have now rebuilt the same functionality into this online version of the app.
Orchardists, nurserymen and hop growers share something in common – they want to get spray to the top of a tall plant canopy with as little waste as possible. The tops of trees, for example, are a primary site of infection as they filter spores from the air, so fungicide coverage is critical. Spraying the tops of high canopies (e.g. too high for over-the-row style sprayers) can be a difficult proposition.
Here are a few considerations:
Wind moving through a planting, as a general rule, is twice as fast at the top of a canopy as it is at the ground. Wind carries spray off target.
The further the distance a droplet travels, the smaller it gets as it evaporates and the less momentum it has. The likelihood of it hitting the target is greatly reduced.
The top of a canopy typically has far less plant material than the rest of the canopy. Relatively speaking, there’s not much there to hit.
In order to overcome these challenges, the traditional axial orchard sprayer is nozzled with a larger proportion of spray distributed at the top of the boom. The idea is to increase the odds of some spray making it to the top of the canopy. Often, full-cone nozzles are used to accomplish this. Of course, if an estimated 10% of the spray actually impinges on the top of the canopy, the rest goes… well, somewhere else. This shotgun approach is hardly an efficient use of chemical.
Another strategy is to crank the PTO rpm’s up to 540, throw the fan in high gear and blow the spray as high as possible. The problem is, by increasing air speed and volume to carry spray to the top, the rest of the canopy (far closer to the sprayer) gets overblown and spray shoots right through. Some overspray might hit the next row, but most ends up on the alley floor. If you doubt it, consider how white your pant-legs get when you walk an orchard after spraying kaolin clay.
Others, mistakenly, might elect to raise the operating pressure to >150 psi in the hope that pressure will drive the droplets in a straight line at higher speeds. Most airblast sprayers using hollow cone patterns create very fine spray quality, even at 100 psi. Raising pressure means the droplets get even smaller, and tiny droplets have very little momentum. Increasing pressure just makes the problem worse.
Here’s what we propose.
Deflectors
If using an axial sprayer, employ air deflectors at the top of the air outlet to channel air (and spray) more effectively. The commercially-available deflectors are often just flat sheets, and air hits the surface and spills over all edges. Image pouring water onto a dinner plate – it just splashes over any which way. Better to replace those deflectors with a set that feature side-walls to channel the air. Anyone with access to a break and some sheet metal can make their own, but ensure they do not stick out beyond the wheel of the sprayer or they could snag plants and trellises. Always aim to overshoot the canopy top by a small factor to compensate for unexpected gusts of wind – better to overshoot a bit than to miss.
Commercial deflectors may or may not have channeling side walls. Inset: Homemade deflectors can do a great job.The original Munckhof deflectors were reversed, and a larger set of extensions were fabricated and attached.
Towers
Better than deflectors, some sprayers move the air and nozzles closer to the target via ducted tower assemblies. They work very well, but they must be as tall as the target you intend to spray. Even then, an uneven alley can cause them to rock and you might still miss some upper targets. Operators using adjustable towers or ducts might angle them back to aim the air (and spray) on a slight upward angle rather than parallel to the ground, and that can compensate for a slight height difference, but it begins to defeat the purpose.
Nozzle body on upper tower deflectors. Still some air assist and a good idea, but use air induction nozzles.
Extra Nozzle Bodies
Some creative operators have attached additional nozzle bodies to the tower’s top deflector plate to aim it up in the top of the canopy. Still others have extended the wet boom itself higher than the tower. Unfortunately, although the nozzle is closer to the target (good) the benefit of air assist has been greatly reduced (bad). Air induction nozzles might help on boom extensions, per below.
Wet booms can be extended to reach high canopies, but may no longer benefit from air assist. Consider using air induction nozzles in these positions.
Air Induction Nozzles
Consider using air induction nozzles in the top two positions of each boom (totaling four per sprayer), with or without towers. There are three advantages:
Coarser droplets have more mass. They move in straight lines and are less likely to be deflected by wind before they reach the target.
Coarser droplets can be propelled by pressure, so unlike finer droplets they rely less on being carried by sprayer air.
Coarser droplets that miss the target do not continue upwards; they fall back out of the air into the orchard, reducing off-target drift potential.
No matter which strategy, or combination of strategies, you use to hit the top of the canopy, always confirm coverage using water-sensitive paper. Further, recognize that it’s very difficult to compete with high winds, so know when to wait it out.
Controlling your spray at the top of the canopy means better coverage and less waste. Plus, people won’t see this (wait until the ~50 second mark).
