Category: Boom Sprayers

Main category for sprayers with horizontal booms

Pesticide Drift and Communication
When it comes to information about mitigating pesticide drift, it’s plentiful and easily accessed. I have an archive of >30 articles written by Ontario Ministry of Agriculture staff spanning 1999 to present day. Many are on this website. In fact, there’s so much good information out there (see BeDriftAware) it feels like there’s nothing left to say. As a connoisseur (and author) of such materials, I’ve noticed they can be grouped into four common themes – see if you recognize any:
- The Carrot: These articles describe the benefits of reduced drift, like solid neighbourly relations, reduced environmental impact, saving money in wasted pesticide and improved spray coverage.
- The Stick: These articles feature insurance adjusters or regulators providing statistics from case studies on the financial, legal, and insurance impacts of drift. Not to mention the time it takes to deal with these issues.
- The Heart: Many articles describe the frustration and emotional impact from the driftee’s perspective. Others chronicle the conflict, irritation and personal insult that come from being accused of drifting.
- The Facts: Here we have technical specialists laying out math, such as weather models describing spray behaviour, buffer zones and drift reduction technologies like nozzles, shrouds and sprayer calibration.
Beyond the written word there are also videos, PowerPoint presentations, workshops or demonstrations, government fact sheets, marketing brochures, social media content and smartphone apps. And yet, every May-July, the drift complaints seem to roll in regardless. For those that ask “why?” here are a few possible reasons:
Why drift happens
- Maybe the sprayer operator is pressed for time and chooses to ignore best practices in an effort to catch up. Haste can lead to mistakes.
- Perhaps the sprayer operator is new and inexperienced, or falls into that small demographic without ready access to educational resources like ag meetings or the internet.
- Maybe the operator is a veteran lulled into false security having successfully sprayed so many acres, for so many hours, for so many years. Why be so diligent when nothing bad ever seems to happen? Bad logic, but not uncommon.
- Maybe the problem stemmed from poor communication. Perhaps the land is rented by one person, to a farmer that isn’t there, who has their fields sprayed by custom applicators, who don’t know what’s around the field.
- Or, perhaps, even the best-intentioned sprayer operator can have bad luck.
Where can drift take place?
Agricultural spray (i.e. field crop or horticulture) has the potential to move between operations, or onto residential areas, or sensitive environmental areas. A single operation can even drift an incompatible chemistry onto itself. There are also residential applications (e.g. lawn care) that can negatively affect neighbours. Industrial applications such as roadside sprays can drift to agricultural or residential. Even organic operations spray products that can move outside the treatment area if conditions allow.
It is important to recognize that every single spray application has the potential for off-target movement. That’s why it’s so important to know what and who is around the treated area.
Communication helps
Communication between neighbours can make a big difference, both in preventing drift damage and resolving matters should an incident occur. Here are two perspectives on the same chemical trespass incident. In the first, the parties do not know, and do not care to know, one another. In the second, the parties have communicated previously. Which scenario will be easier to resolve?
1. A “field cropper that drives 20 miles per hour in high winds” is contacted by a MECP officer on behalf of a “vegetable grower that’s always complaining about spraying”. Accusations and defensiveness between the two parties escalate until they prevent them from speaking directly. Specialists, adjusters, and the officer find themselves acting as mediators. The process is slow and likely headed for court.
2. Sarah knocks on Kevin’s door and says there might be something wrong with her crop – can he come have a look? She has (rightfully) contacted the MECP to collect samples just in case, and Kevin has all his spray records so they can figure it out. They call in a crop consultant and she contacts a university specialist to solve the problem and prevent it happening again. They follow the crop to yield to determine the impact and agree on a settlement between them.
Regarding Scenario 1, it’s not my intention to slander field croppers or horticulturalists; I have actually heard parties involved in highly emotional drift disputes describe one another this way. My intent is to point out that you cannot label an entire industry based on the actions of an individual. When parties see each other in this fashion they are unlikely to work together to resolve the problem. No one will be satisfied with the outcome.
Regarding Scenario 2, I have observed that once each party has a face and a name, it’s so much easier to find solutions. It doesn’t mean someone wasn’t at fault or that compensation isn’t required, but the dialogue facilitates a faster, easier and less emotional outcome. Obviously, in the case of repeated or large-scale incidents, communication may not yield satisfactory results. I’m hopeful, but not naive.
Opening a dialogue
Communication can be initiated from either direction: An applicator can inform a residential neighbour or fellow farmer with sensitive crops when and what they intend to spray. Likewise, the neighbour or sensitive crop grower can reach out to the applicator to let them know they are there and that they are concerned.
There’s no need to wait until there’s a problem. Both parties benefit from keeping one another informed about when sprays go on and the state of any sensitive crops. And, if there is an issue, both parties should begin documenting conditions and suspected damage as soon as possible and over time during the resolution.
Penn State produced a great article about speaking about pesticides with neighbours.
Final thoughts
So, the core of this article isn’t how to prevent drift, or what to do if you suspect it. That’s all been said and I’ve listed a few resources for reference at the end. This article is about being aware of drift potential and about opening lines of communication between those that share borders.
So follow the links below to learn more about what you can do to mitigate drift. Then, go introduce yourself to your neighbours. Bring a pie. Everyone loves pie.
Resources
- Article – This link includes four videos and a factsheet about what drift is, how to prevent it and what to do if you suspect it.
- Article – This link includes a video and a factsheet about surface inversions and drift.
- Article – Spraying in the wind.
- Video – The time of day can affect drift potential.
- Video – Spray quality (i.e. droplet size) and how it relates to drift.
- Two articles (one and two) on reducing travel speed and employing other means of improving productivity.
- Article – Drift-reducing nozzles.
- Website – This is a link to BeDriftAware, a collection of resources and tools to encourage the use of best application practices by farmers and sprayer operators to reduce the possibility of spray drift.
July 15, 2019
What’s with dew? – Tips with Tom #9
When warm air is cooled, it loses some of its moisture-holding capabilities. This change often occurs at night, when plants (and other objects) cool. Once the temperature of the surface of the leaves, for example, drops below the dewpoint, it causes water to condense, forming the shiny dew that causes so many to question early morning spray applications.
The question is often: will the spray run off the plant or will it get so diluted that it doesn’t work anymore?
In a dew chamber, work has shown that large spray droplets are more likely to run off a plant saturated with dew than their smaller counterparts. However, similar work showed that spray efficacy was not altered by droplet size.
Wolf discusses this work and the potential answer to the seemingly conflicting findings. Wolf also explains how grassy weeds compare to broadleaves, the role of surfactants, and what to consider when making the decision to spray through dew or not.
July 5, 2019
Air Orientation for Wrap-Around Sprayers
One of the pleasures of working in agricultural extension is when you’re able to help a grower solve a problem. This was one of those happy occasions. An orchardist purchased a Lipco multi-row recycling sprayer and wanted help evaluating their spray coverage.
We worked in 3.7 m (12 foot), mature, high-density Royal Gala trees. The sprayer was driving at 5.0 km/h (3.1 mph), operating at 11 bar (160 psi) using orange Albuz 80 degree air-induction flat fans. This resulted in about 350 L/ha (~37 gpa).
This grower wisely invested in the air-assist option, which produces a vertical plane of somewhat laminar air to entrain the spray and carry it into the centre of the target canopy. Whatever spray blows through the tree should impact the opposing shroud and get recycled back to the tank. All in all, how could you miss?
…we managed to.
Water sensitive papers were placed back-to-back facing each alley (in other words, facing the spray booms). Despite our best efforts, each pass resulted in inconsistent coverage. Papers were replaced in the same location and orientation for each pass and no settings were changed. Nevertheless, sometimes a paper got spray and sometimes it didn’t. What was going on? It was as if the two air streams were interfering with one another – almost cancelling each other out.
Air from tangential (cross-flow) fans oriented perpendicular to the canopy in direct opposition will cancel out. This reduces canopy penetration.
Where possible, do not position laminar air outlets in direct opposition. The convergence creates a high-pressure zone that reduces spray penetration. Some sprayers are designed to avoid this by staggering air outlets one ahead of the other. Laminar flows will deflect unpredictably around this pressurized area and carry droplets back out of the canopy. Unless the canopy is particularly narrow and sparse, turbulent air handling systems do not typically create this problem. In both cases, canopy penetration is improved when fans are staggered and/or are angled slightly forward or backward.
Grey arrows indicate direction of travel. The air outlets of wrap-around sprayers should be symmetrical when viewed from behind. A. Tangential fans in direct opposition: Poor coverage. B. Tangential fans angled forward/backward: Possible vortices and good coverage. C. Tangential fans angled backward: Good coverage, but if the angle is too steep, air will not penetrate the canopy. D. Straight-through axial fans in direct opposition: Good coverage in denser canopies. E. Straight-through axial fans angled slightly backward: Good coverage but limit the angle to prevent the trailing edge of the air wash from missing the canopy entirely. F. Straight-through axial fans angled forward: Slight angles are acceptable, but too much in this image. Wind created by travel speed subtracts from air energy. This creates a risk of reduced coverage and increased operator exposure.
We decided to turn the outer boom/shroud/fan assemblies 10˚ backward by loosening the four bolts at the top of the gantry (see below). This minor change in configuration improved spray coverage significantly. Increasing the angle beyond 10° might have caused the air wash to trail along the canopy face and would have made sprayer turns difficult at the row ends.
We loosened the four clamping screws to adjust the fan angle on the outer boom of this Lipco Recycling Tunnel sprayer.
We replaced the water sensitive papers and ran another pass. The operator later told me he could see the leaves and branches rustling in the row where we made the adjustment, but not in the unadjusted row. The result on water-sensitive paper was dramatic.
Since experiencing this in 2013, I have been told that the Lipco instruction manual advises against air in direct opposition. It was a poorly translated and somewhat obscure sentence buried in the manual, but I concede that it was there. Determine whether your sprayer produces more laminar or more turbulent air, and explore how their relative orientation impacts canopy penetration.
Sometimes, you just have to cross the streams!
May 23, 2019
ExactApply: How to add “Section Flow %” Module to Run Screen
The John Deere ExactApply system has a pulsing feature, more commonly known as “Pulse Width Modulation” (PWM). From the operator’s perspective, it’s important to know the Duty Cycle that the system is operating at. The Duty Cycle (DC) is the percentage of time that the pulsing solenoids are “on”, or flowing. At the average travel speed, the pulsing system should operate at 60 to 80% DC for optimum performance. For in-depth explanation of ExactApply, read here.
Unlike its PWM counterparts (Raven Hawkeye, Capstan Pinpoint), the new John Deere 4600 monitor does not display the DC by default. Fortunately, it offers a module for insertion to its run pages.
The module isn’t perfect, and inserting it into an active run page is torture.
Here is how to bring this module onto a 4600 screen:
1. On 4600 Monitor, click on “menu” (bottom right).
2. Select “Applications” tab.
3. Choose “Layout Manager”.
4. Edit Run Page Set.
5. It’s easiest to copy an existing Run Page, rename it, and then customize its modules.
6. Make room on new Run page for new module. On my copy of the “Spraying” run page, I’ve deleted a module on the bottom left that I have elsewhere. Now “Add Module”.
7. Select “Machine Settings” tab, then “Boom & Nozzles”.
8. Scroll down to “Section Flow %” (four windows) and “Add Module”.
9. Module is placed in available open area. There is a warning if not enough screen space is available.
10. Save new Run page. Make sure it’s part of the “Active Run Page Set” in Layout Manager so it’s available to scroll to while spraying.
The module is a bar graph that gives you relative DCs along boom. In the first example, we’re driving straight and everything is fine. After a couple of shoulder checks, we pull out the smartphone and take a picture.
The bar graph format is useful during turn (left in this example, forcing higher DC to outside of boom, the right).
If it plateaus on outside (as in tight right turn, below), you are under-applying on the outside since the DC can’t go higher than 100%. Slow down and that improves it because it lowers the duty cycle of the entire machine.
Slowing down may cause too low a DC, resulting in over-application on inside of boom because the DC can’t be reduced below 15%.
Remember, for Turn Compensation to work, make sure the box is checked (Menu|Boom & Nozzles|ExactApply Config/Spray Mode|Manual Setup|i|<down four screens>|Turn Compensation Check box). While you’re there, make sure the “Limit Minimum Flow %” is unchecked. This lets DC go down to 15%, from 25%.
Happy Pulsing!
May 6, 2019
The Capstan EVO: PWM for the masses
Capstan Ag brought Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) to spraying in the mid 1990s. Over the past 20 years, it has become commonplace on Case sprayers as AIM Command and AIM Command Pro, and as an aftermarket product, called Sharpshooter or PinPoint, on any brand sprayer. If you’re new to the concept, read about it here and here.
A sprayer turn, without turn compensation. Note the darker dye on the innermost nozzles and lighter deposits on the outer wing.
The latest versions (AIM Command Pro and PinPoint) offer turn compensation and individual nozzle sectional control. But there remains a large base of older AIM Command units that lack turn compensation. And of course, sprayers that lack PWM alltogether, possibly because of cost.
The Capstan EVO addresses both issues. Introduced in January of 2019, it gives older AIM Command units affordable turn compensation. As a bonus, a complete new EVO install on non-PWM sprayers is available at a significant discount compared to most other PWM products.
EVO features many of the same basic PWM capabilities as its bigger cousins, but with a shortcut, explain Capstan representatives.
As always, a change in travel speed changes the duty cycle of the pulsing solenoid, adjusting flow rate of the nozzle without a change in pressure. This provides the consistency in performance that we love about PWM. Drift or coverage are controlled by the operator who makes changes to spray pressure from the cab, with a commensurate background adjustment in duty cycle so that travel speed is unaffected.
With the EVO, the shortcut is that sectional control is by plumbed section. Technically it’s possible to add sections, but the rate controller and the sprayer wiring would have to allow it.
Spray dosage for sectional turn compensation for six sections of equal size, with the centre of each section applying the target dose. As always, some lateral movement of spray from adjacent nozzles will occur.
Turn compensation is part of EVO, and this is an important benefit that was previously only available in more expensive versions of a PWM product. Each section will have a fixed turn compensation based on the speed of the centre of the section. Its performance will depend on the size of the sections.
For a 100′ boom with six 10-nozzle sections turning around an object with a 60′ diameter, our modelling shows that the deviation from perfect turn compensation is least on the outer wings (where it’s most important) and grows towards the inside of the turn. In this example, the outer section’s end nozzle under-applies by 6% relative to the ideal, and the innermost nozzle on this section over-applies by 7%.
On the next section, these deviations are 7% under and 8% over, then 8% under and 9% over.
Moving from the centre of the sprayer to the inner wing, deviations are 9% under and 12% over, then 12% under and 16% over, and finally 16% under and 24% over.
Spray deposition on an un-compensated turn.
On an uncompensated boom with the same dimensions, the outermost nozzle would be under-dosing 38% and the innermost nozzle would be over-dosing by 267%.
Recall that it’s more important to be accurate on the outer wing than on the inner, for the purpose of delivering the full spray dose in a turn.
Repeated year-after-year under-dosing at the periphery of a turn such as field corners, or around permanent features such as sloughs, trees, or stone piles results in weed problems.
EVO is intended for users with an original SharpShooter or AIM Command who would like turn compensation but don’t want to a whole new PWM system. EVO provides new modules and a new screen, but users save money because they can keep their existing solenoids, says Capstan.
Capstan says that EVO is for every brand of sprayer ordered without pwm control from new to 15 years old. It’s an easy upgrade for owners of AIM Command & SharpShooter systems because these already have most of the components, and install times are therefore lower for these machines. Existing solenoids and wiring harnesses can be retained.
Owners of high clearance pull type sprayers will also see the advantage of turn compensation and pressure control at an attractive price point.
EVO modules and tools needed for installation
I was present during an installation of these new modules on an existing Case 3330 sprayer with AIM Command. It took one person, with occasional assistance from a second, less than 1 h to do the conversion.
Removal of AIM Command modules
Installation of EVO board containing all modules and replacement plugins
A new installation would require an additional several hours to install wiring harnesses and solenoids. Times will vary with sprayer model and technical experience of the installers.
The EVO electronics run in parallel to the existing sprayer monitor. It allows the existing monitor to control sections and determine the flow requirements. It does not control pump speed, it simply reads the flow, pressure, and gps signal from the sprayer’s systems and uses them to determine the duty cycle (DC) that ensures the spray pressure remains constant. On AIM Command units, the pressure control module remains installed and pressure adjustment remains possible through AIM Command in cab controls.
Entering system settings into new EVO monitor
It’s possible to set the pulsing frequency between 3 and 30 Hz in EVO, an industry first. The lower the frequency, the wider the dynamic flow rate. Capstan advises to maintain a frequency above 10 Hz for spray operations. Lower frequencies may be used for fertilizer applications, where prescription maps require a higher rate range and where uniformity requirements are more relaxed.
EVO Monitor contains an option in which to select pulsing frequency
Testing of completed EVO Installation
The monitor has an intuitive readout of average DC and a bar graph showing the DC across sections in a turn. If this bar maxes out on the outer sections during a turn, simply slow down to lower average DC and provide extra capacity to those sections.
EVO monitor during operation. Readout includes current spray pressure, duty cycle, and turn compensation status.
Lowering the cost of PWM makes it attractive to a new group of users. It also offers a more affordable upgrade path for owners of AIM Command or SharpShooter systems that currently do not have turn compensation.
The cover says AIM Command, but the guts are EVO
March 25, 2019