Some years ago, a friend recommended that I read The Tipping Point by Malcolm Gladwell. In this book, Gladwell tries to understand why some things catch on, and others don’t. It’s a compelling read full of Gladwell’s trademark stories and his knack to deftly interpret scientific studies. He talks of connectors, mavens, and salesmen, as well as the “stickiness factor”, a measure of how memorable something is, as keys to success of products and ideas. I think of the book often as I ponder the many good ideas in agriculture, many of which never see widespread adoption.
One of these good ideas is spot spraying. Green-on-brown detection was first introduced in the early 1990s. Anyone remember the Concord DetectSpray? It was great but had bad timing, as resistance wasn’t a big issue and glyphosate prices were about to slide. Green-on-brown grew to the NTech (later Trimble) WeedSeeker a few years later. Rometron’s WEEDit built on Trimble’s success and found widespread adoption in Australia in the past ten years. Spot spraying did not gain any traction in North America during this time.
Australia is unique in many ways, not the least of which is their summer spraying practice. Summer is the hot, dry season where land is typically fallow and weeds are kept in check with herbicide sprays (aaaah, the serenity). Making several passes over a field, combined with the need to control some larger and hardy plants, is expensive, and a spot spray saves much of the cost. The savings can be put to use with more effective herbicide tank mixes that delay the onset of herbicide resistance. Spot sprays pay for themselves in short order Down Under.
It’s more of a challenge in the northern plains of North America, where the fallow season involves snow cover and burnoff occurs in a short window before seeding and sometimes after harvest. But nonetheless, spot sprays have a fit for many of the same reasons.
WEEDit is the first system to make serious inroads in North America, with several dozen systems having been retrofitted to high-clearance sprayers. High detection accuracy and hardware reliability is proven in three seasons.
On March 2, 2021, John Deere entered the Green-on-brown spot spray area with See & Spray Select. This not to be mistaken as competition. Instead, the entry of a major brand provides validation of the concept like only a large manufacturer can. Yes, we’ve reached a tipping point.
While the first Green-on-brown units are becoming established, Green-on-green, the ability to detect weeds within a crop, continues to be developed around the world. French startup Bilberry has made enough gains in Australia to bring its product to market with Agrifac, where it’s called AIC Plus. In farmer field trials, they have achieved 90 per cent detection accuracy of wild radish in Western Australia, and claim that they are ready for broadleaf weed identification in wheat, barley and oats. Bilberry’s technology will also be seen on Australia’s Goldacres and France’s Berthoud. Other startups, notably Israel’s Greeneye Technology, plan to introduce a Green-on-green system in the U.S. in the near future. Amazone, the German farm equipment giant, partnering with Xarvio and Bosch, announced plans at Agritechnica to have a commercial unit for sale by 2021.
This technology will have significant impact on sprayer design philosophy. At present, productivity is synonymous with capacity, and large tanks with commensurate heavy and powerful tractor units dominate. Spot spraying savings will depend on weed density and hardware resolution, but 50 per cent to 90 per cent reductions in spray volume can be expected. A 1,600-gallon tank would no longer be necessary. The savings in frame weight and horsepower would be significant, as would the time savings from less intense tendering demands. These savings would offset the lower driving speeds that accompany sensing technologies, and, overall, provide a lower bar for autonomous operation. We may see lighter specialty spot sprayers.
The savings in brute size will be countered by increased sophistication. Better boom height management is essential for spot spraying, not just for the sensor to properly see the target and estimate the time needed for the boom to reach that spot, but also for the spot spray itself to deliver the right dose. In any fan spray, band width at ground level changes with height, and that, of course, is related to dose. Trailed booms can address this issue easily.
But not everyone wants a specialty spot sprayer that would require an extra pass over the field. With growing utility of soil residual herbicides, dual tank sprayers—small tank for the spot spray, large tank for the broadcast residual—make sense. Large sprayer frames can accommodate an additional smaller tank, second pump, and plumbed boom easily.
Plant detection and identification bring other opportunities. Adjusting dose for plant size is one of the first, or for harder to control weed species.
Spot sprays rely on fast, precise response of the nozzle, and this provided by fast-reacting solenoids that are part of pulse-width modulation (PWM) systems. On a broadcast sprayer, these solenoids can change the emitted dose instantly, within a certain envelope, by altering the duty cycle of the pulse. This, however, works best in the context of a boom with overlapping spray patterns. A single band spray would not change dose with duty cycle as easily.
Higher dosing would be an opportunity for multiple nozzle bodies that are able to spray one, two or more nozzles in the same spot simultaneously. These are already widely available and popular in Europe.
This also brings direct injection into play. Current systems introduce the active ingredient into the boom upstream of the nozzles, affording it time to mix into the water. For true spot spray utility, though, direct injection ought to be at the nozzle. Only then can custom mixes and rates be applied on a spot basis. It’s been done before, if only to show how difficult it would be to deliver uniform doses to a spot spray machine.
Spot spray sensors have agronomic benefits. By recording the location sprayed, weed patches can be mapped. As plant identification becomes possible, it’s conceivable to obtain plant species and stage distribution maps from the spray pass That would turn the sprayer into a high-resolution crop scouting tool. As machine learning and sensor sophistication grows, other plant and soil parameters can be mapped. The agronomic value of such maps, especially if created over the course of the growing season, is immense. Of course, data density, handling, storage, and analysis will constrain this.
If the past has taught us anything, it’s that there seems to be a appetite for investment in farm equipment. Sprayers have been the most-used implement on the farm for some time, and their popularity continues despite sharp price increases. These new capabilities will only add value to these implements. Prepare for sticker shock, followed by acceptance and adoption.
What will a future spot sprayer look like? Although it will have tanks and booms, the level of electronic sophistication will make it so much more versatile we can’t yet imagine all the ways in which it might be used. But it seems to me the situation has tipped and we’re already accelerating toward that future.
On March 2, 2021, John Deere entered the optical spot spray (OSS) market with its first product, See & Spray Select™. This “Green on Brown” system identifies green material on a non-green background and is thus suited for pre-seed burnoff, chem fallow, or post harvest. It is competing for the same market space as Cropland’s WEEDit and Trimble’s WeedSeeker, but uses a slightly different approach.
At the heart of the See & Spray system is a relatively simple RGB camera that is mounted directly to the boom and looks about 1.5 m ahead. When this camera detects a spot of green colour, it assumes that this is a plant and activates a nozzle in line with that plant. John Deere says the weed size threshold is about ¼” (6 mm), and is evaluating its experimental data to identify exceptions to that rule of thumb.
See & Spray Select uses an RGB camera to detect weeds (Image courtesy John Deere)
In 2017, John Deere conducted a highly publicized acquisition of Blue River Technologies, a start up that pioneered artificial intelligence (AI) plant identification and coined the term “See & Spray”. However, the technology John Deere announced this time originated with the University of Southern Queensland near Toowoomba, Australia. The university’s Centre for Agricultural Engineering had received some initial seed financing from Sugar Research Australia, Cotton Research and Development Corporation, and Hort Innovation, and eventually partnered with John Deere. This is yet another example of the value of farmer investments in research.
Blue River contributed to this project but remains committed to its path of developing Green on Green OSS through machine learning. John Deere says this first product is part of an evolution of spraying with ever-increasing precision that will culminate in spot spraying weeds within a canopy.
The pixels in the See & Spray camera chip are mapped during its initial calibration, allowing the processor to know which nozzle to turn on. There are two user-selected modes. In “Single Nozzle” Mode, the system turns on as few nozzles as possible. If the weed is directly under a nozzle, just that nozzle is turned on. Should the weed be in between two nozzles, both will be turned on. In “Overlapping” Mode, a detection will turn on at least three, and up to six adjacent nozzles. This mode is intended for herbicides that contain specific nozzle recommendations on the label, such as dicamba. By fitting these tips on the spot spray location, the required overlap and subsequent coverage can be guaranteed to be compliant with that label, a unique feature of See & Spray.
The number of nozzles activated by a weed detection depends on the location of the weed relative to the nozzles, and the mode selected by the user (Image courtesy John Deere)
In all modes, the user can specify the distance before and after the detected plant that the nozzle will spray. This feature is useful when boom height varies or when travelling faster to provide extra assurance that the target will be covered by the spray. The boom height range for See & Spray is 26 to 47” (66 to 120 cm), and the maximum travel speed with nozzles pointed down is 12 mph.
Installation of a 40 degree angled adaptor allows sprays tom be emitted backwards, and increases the spray speeds to 16 mph due to the extra distance and time afforded the sensors andoin processors to make a decision.
See & Spray has a built in contingency for suboptimal conditions, for example when the boom falls outside its height range, or the nozzle speed (not tractor) exceeds the 12 or 16 mph maximum in a turn, or a light or sensor or processor fault occurs. Called “Fallback Mode”, the boom can be configured to shut off, or to go into broadcast mode (using the spot spray nozzles) at that time. These types of insurance are a necessary part of an OSS on the market today.
To prevent fallback mode from occuring unecessarily, operators often choose to reduce their tractor speed one or two mph to allow for yaw without triggering all the nozzles.
No OSS system is perfect. Tiny weeds, or those obscured from camera view by crop residue, may be missed. The contingency for WEEDit is “Combined Mode”, where the entire boom emits a broadcast spray at a user-determined fraction of the full dose, while still maintaining spot spray capability at the full dose when a detection occurs. The reduced dose is sufficient to control the smallest weeds, whereas the spot spray is emitted at the full label rate for the larger ones. This capability is made possible through Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) control of each nozzle.
John Deere has developed a mode of its ExactApply system to create the same outcome. Called “A & B Mode”, the rear nozzle (B location on the ExactApply nozzle body) is being activated by See & Spray. The front nozzle (A location) can be asked to spray simultaneously over the entire boom width. By choosing a smaller nozzle, a fraction of the label rate can be applied as a broadcast while maintaining spot spray capability. The broadcast boom is pulse-width modulated and retains the swath control and turn compensation of ExactApply. This mode also makes it easier to ensure coverage of these smaller weeds by selecting a finer, wider (110 degree) angles spray on the broadcast boom, and retaining a coarser, narrower fan angle banding nozzle for the spot application. The spot spray does not use PWM, relying on conventional speed and pressure to ensure the correct rate.
If planning to use A & B Mode, a user would first need to decide if they will calculate the spot spray dosing on a single or a multiple activated nozzle system. If priorizing the single nozzle actiation, one would first determine the band width of that nozzle, and size the nozzle accordingly. The band width should be ar close to the nozzle spacing as possible to maximize savings. Say the sprayer has 15″ spacing, and the nozzle’s band width is 20″. Now, whenever multiple nozzles are activated, they would operate as a 15″ spacing and would over-apply 20/15 = 1.33, or 33%. Say you want to apply 15 gpa (you may need to boost the spot spray volume to allow you to cut that with the broadcast feature). You can do it with the band (and overdose when using multiple nozzles, or apply 15 gpa with the multiple nozzles, underdosing by 28% when a single nozzle is activated. Or split the difference.
The next step is to select the application rate of the broadcast. If you want to apply 30% of the spot spray rate using the broadcast nozzles, size these accrodingly to apply 5 gpa.
For band- and spot-sprays, the width of the spray pattern at the target height determines the dose, therefore careful selection is advised. A worksheet that shows boom heights at various fan angles and nozzle spacings is downloadable here. TeeJet and Hypro offer a selection of narrower flat fan tips, but none yet in a low-drift design. Other nozzles are in development. Agrotop has already developed a low-drift “Spot Fan”, and MagnoJet, a Brazilian ceramic nozzle supplier, has 30 and 40 degree low drift tips for sale. Wilger has develped the DX series ComboJet tips in 20, 40, and 60 degree fan angles, in a low drift (pre-orifice design that works with PWM.
The camera sensing threshold can be adjusted to optimize a specific target. For example, to specify a certain weed size, that weed can be held in view of the sensor and the user can adjust the sensitivity until the weed is properly detected. As with any higher sensitivity, this runs the risk of more false detections, resulting in over-application. But it gives the user some knowledge that an important weed stage is being targeted properly.
The See & Spray camera relies on ambient light conditions, and John Deere recommends it not be used within 30 minutes of dawn or dusk. Both WEEDit and WeedSeeker, in contrast, can operate under any light conditions.
One of the challenges of running a OSS boom is the unpredictable fluctuation in flow requirement, which can theoretically range from just a few nozzles spraying to the whole boom activated in less than one second. While this extreme example is rare, a sophisticated and fast-responding pressure-based flow capability is nonetheless required. WEEDit uses a Ramsay Valve into their units to handle this challenge, whereas John Deere is relying on its existing plumbing design.
As a factory install, the See & Spray is fully integrated into the Series 4 display and is tied into JD Link. As a result, it can generate a high resolution map that shows each spot spray activation, by nozzle. The agronomic utility of this capability is significant, as it provides a very high resolution plant density map. This capability is also inherent in WEEDit and most green on Green systems available..
See & Spray Select is a factory option and comes integrated into the 4600 series monitor (Image courtesy John Deere)
It’s no secret that I believe optical spot sprays represent the future of pesticide application (see here). And it’s great news to see John Deere enter the OSS area with a factory installed option. As an influential force in ag, it lends credence to the concept and will benefit all other companies vying for this space. As they say, a rising tide raises all ships.
Waste (noun): an act or instance of using or expending something to no purpose.
In agriculture, environment and economy are intertwined. Producers strive to obtain the maximum return on their inputs. They study incremental returns and avoid applying more inputs than necessary, especially if conditions don’t warrant it. The financial incentive is powerful, and waste is a four-letter word. This applies to seed, fertilizer, and pesticide. Pesticide labels identify the rate needed to obtain the desired result, and there is no incentive to over-apply. In fact, it’s illegal.
But there are plenty of other places where applications incur waste. As with time efficiency, it’s a good idea to identify where this waste occurs, and the only tool needed is a sharp pencil.
When might we incur waste in the spray application process?
Mixing more than we need because we don’t trust the flow meter or the tank gauge entirely, or don’t know the exact field size.
Priming the boom before the first swath.
Overlapping due to curvy terrain and coarse sectional control.
Spray drift away from the intended swath.
How big are the losses?
Let’s say we have a clean sprayer and need to spray 160 acres before moving to a new crop and product. We plan to apply 10 gallons per acre and have a 1,200 gallon tank with a 120 foot boom. That means we need 1,600 gallons of spray mix in total.
Once we’re at the field we prime the boom. Each sprayer is different, but depending on operator experience, 30 to 50 gallons are usually needed to push product from the tank to the last nozzle. Only part of that is lost to the ground, as boom sections can be shut off as soon as product has reached every nozzle of that section. We’re assuming 0.2 gallons per foot of boom is lost.
Spraying itself is relatively straightforward. Swath and sectional control handle the overlaps, but in less ideal terrain, double application is known to account for 4 to 5% of the area to reach non-square parts of the field. This is even more likely when the outer section is 10’ or more. Early turn-on of the boom prior to leaving the headland, to allow boom to reach operating pressure, adds to this.
Air-activated shutoff for individual nozzles reduces section size at a reasonable cost.
With an average nozzle, we can expect about 2% of the product to airborne drift. Most airborne won’t return to the ground within the field borders, so it’s a complete loss.
Most of the spray that travels more than 5 m after leaving boom stays airborne and should be considered a total loss from the field.
As we finish, the pump will draw air before the tank is empty due to sloshing or foaming, and a 50 to 60 gallon remainder may not be unusual. This simulation has assumed 5% of tank volume remains.
We also need to purge spray from the boom at cleanout, consuming approximately 0.4 gallons per foot of boom. This occurs after the field is completely sprayed and is therefore considered waste.
So how does this add up? The following table shows the approximate losses associated with five setups.
Table 1: Spray mix losses during a sprayer operation. Setup 1 = baseline, Setup 2 = low application volume, Setup 3 = baseline with recirculating boom, tank level monitor, and low-drift nozzles, Setup 4 = large area between cleaning, Setup 5 = large area with recirculating boom, tank level monitor, and low-drift nozzles.
In the first scenario, we spray just 160 acres at 10 gallons per acre. Priming the boom with 0.4 gallons per foot (allowing for all associated feed lines) consumes 48 gallons, but only wastes half of that, or 1.5% of the total volume needed for the field.
Four percent overlap consumes another 64 gallons.
If we have 5% of the tank volume left over, that’s 60 gallons. That amount is so small it doesn’t even register on the sight gauge but nonetheless it represents another 4% of the total sprayed amount.
Upon cleaning the boom, we need to push the spray mix out of all the plumbing after the pump, as it has nowhere else to go. At an assumed 0.4 gallons per foot, that’s another 48 gallons or 3%.
If we add to that a conservative 2% drift loss, it sums to a surprising 14% of the total spray volume. For those that use lower water volumes (the second scenario), the volumetric losses are slightly less, but their proportion is higher, now accounting for 23% (!) of the total spray mix.
In the third scenario, let’s assume we use a recirculating boom that returns the initial prime volume to the tank, eliminating any waste. We’ll also upgrade to individual nozzle sectional control, reducing overlap to 1%. And, since we want to know exactly what’s left in the tank, let’s invest in an AccuVolume system to precisely monitor tank volume. This allows us to make small rate adjustments up or down to be sure as much of the mixed product goes onto the sprayed swath as possible.
Recirculating booms allows the spray mix to pass through entire length of boom without being sprayed, saving waste during priming and allowing waste-free boom rinses.
When the sump begins to empty, we can introduce some water from the clean water tank to push the last of the mix to the boom (a continuous rinse system makes this easy).
An AccuVolume sensor shows the exact volume left in the tank at any slope position and with 1 gallon resolution, allowing greater accuracy when filling and emptying.
We’ll assume our sump waste is now reduced to 12 gallons. We still need to dispose of the content of the boom somehow, so the recirculating boom offers no saving there. But let’s also add better low-drift nozzles to reduce drift by 50% (now 1% total volume). Total loss is now just 6%.
Low-drift nozzles such as this AirMix (Agrotop) SoftDrop reduce airborne drift by 50 to 90%.
The last two rows in the table repeat the first and third scenarios for a larger sprayed area (1000 acres) before a tank cleaning is needed. This doesn’t change the magnitude of the volumetric loss, but reduces its proportion. Percent loss is down by a factor of two from the 160 acre interval, to 3 to 7%.
Experienced operators might cheat the system a bit by mixing the required pesticide with some extra water to make up for the plumbing waste. Doing so prevents extra pesticide from being consumed, but it doesn’t reduce the inherent inefficiency.
Lessons
This exercise suggests that waste from spraying is probably higher than we assumed. If we average the scenarios, there is 10 to 15% waste. At, say, $200,000 spent on pesticide for a single spraying season, that’s $20 – $30,000 worth of product and water hauled that ends up where it doesn’t belong. Beyond the time and money, there can also be environmental consequences depending on how that waste is treated.
Improve monitoring of tank content to allow lower remainders.
Consider individual nozzle shutoff to improve sectional control. These are part of Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) systems, but can also be achieved with less expensive valves.
Plan spray operations to minimize the amount of product changeovers.
Consider direct injection.
The return on investment for plumbing improvements can be high and result in considerable future savings over the life of the sprayer. It’s worth thinking about.
When I had to replace a pump on a small scale sprayer, I had a lot of questions about how they worked, their capacities, hose sizes, mounting solutions and fittings. I turned to the Pentair Hypro Shurflo catalog and found a very helpful guide on pages 2 – 10. This article summarizes the steps recommended in the catalog.
Select Pump Style
Sprayer pumps can be divided into two categories: Positive Displacement Pumps and Non-Positive Displacement Pumps.
Positive Displacement Pumps
These include Roller, Diaphragm and Piston pumps. They are self-priming and traditionally operate at high pressures. Flow from these pumps is directly proportional to the pump speed, which is why they require a relief valve and bypass line between the pump outlet and the nozzle shut-off valve.
Roller pumps : This is the most popular pump with farmers world-wide. The seal and roller materials should be selected based on their compatibilities with the pesticides.
Diaphragm pumps : These compact pumps are popular for use with abrasive and corrosive pesticides. Their oil-filled piston chambers protect the pump materials.
Piston pumps : Similar to car engines, these pumps are relatively low-flow and high-pressure and suited for use with handguns sprayers. The piston cup materials should be selected based on their compatibilities with the pesticides.
Non-Positive Displacement Pumps
These include Turbine (or Transfer) and Centrifugal pumps. They must be primed and traditionally operate at low to medium pressures, although there are models available that can go up to 190 psi. Flow from these durable pumps comes from a rotating impeller that feeds liquid through the lines instead of pumping “per stroke”. Therefore, if the outlet is closed for brief periods, the impeller spins harmlessly, so a relief valve is not needed.
Determine PTO Pump Drive
When selecting a pump, you must specify the shaft rotation. Hypro suggests two steps for determining the required rotation:
Eyes on the End: Face the rotating Power Take-Off (PTO) and determine if it is spinning clockwise (CW) or counter-clockwise (CCW).
Opposites Attract: The pump must rotate opposite to the PTO. For example, if the PTO rotates CW, then the pump must rotate CCW and vice versa.
You should also be aware of your tractors’ horse power, and in order to determine the size of pump shaft, you should know the spline dimensions (e.g. 1-3/8″ (6 spline) pto shaft or 1-3/8″ 21-spline pto shaft).
Determine Pressure and Flow Requirements
In order to size the pump, you have to know the sprayer settings, such as intended application rate, average ground speed, agitation requirements, etc. Most can be calculated form the following formulae (provided in US and Metric units):
Calculating Agitation Requirements
Liquids :
Tank Volume (US gal.) × 0.05 = Agitation Requirement (gpm) Tank Volume (L) × 0.05 = Agitation Requirement (L/min.)
Wettable Powders and Flowables
Tank Volume (US gal.) × 0.125 = Agitation Requirement (gpm) Tank Volume (L) × 0.125 = Agitation Requirement (L/min.)
If the sprayer has a hydraulic agitation system equipped with a jet, it multiplies the agitation output without the need for additional flow. For example, it might have a 1 gpm input flow and boost it to a 10 gpm output. This savings should be accounted for:
Therefore, if you calculate a 60 gpm requirement for agitation, and have a jet that boosts the output 3:1:
60 gpm x (1 / 3) = 20 (gpm)
Calculating Nozzle Requirements
Once the agitation requirements are accounted for, you have to account for nozzles. The calculations are a little different for each sprayer, but they amount to the same thing – Total flow in US Gallons per minute or Litres per minute. Here is the calculation for a boom sprayer. For an airblast sprayer, assuming you are spraying every row, substitute “Row Spacing” for “Boom width”.
Total Flow Requirement (gpm) = [Output (gpa) x Ground Speed (mph) × Boom width (ft)] ÷ 495
Total Flow Requirement (L/min.) = [Output (L/ha) x Ground Speed (km/h) × Boom width (m)] ÷ 600
When the flow requirement for agitation and the flow requirement for the nozzles have been calculated, they are added together. It is important not to under-size the pump, so always factor in an extra 20% to compensate for changes in performance (such as pump wear and slower ground speeds) and restrictions in the plumbing systems that can cause pressure drops between the pump and nozzles, as follows:
Finally, be sure to account for any other flow requirements, such as tank rinsing nozzles and hose length/diameter (which causes pressure drops), and have some idea how you want to place the pump relative to the tractor and sprayer. If you prepare all this information, you can quickly and easily discuss your options with the retailer and select the pump that best suits your needs.
For more information on various types of pumps, check out this article by Dr. Bob Wolf:
The pump is the heart of the sprayer and a key component for producing the flow of spray material and sprayer output. Because various spraying situations require different pressures and flow rates, using the correct sprayer pump is essential to achieving desired results. In addition to sprayer considerations, a pump must also be durable enough to withstand harsh chemicals that may cause excessive wear. Even though pumps with added chemical corrosion protection are more expensive, they are a popular choice because of their durability.
Roller, centrifugal, diaphragm, and piston pumps are commonly used to apply crop protection products. Centrifugal and roller pumps are typically used for low-pressure sprayers, and diaphragm and piston pumps are more popular when high-pressure sprayers are needed (i.e., vegetables, orchards, etc.). Less common pump types include squeeze, gear, and turbine.
Pumps are typically either ground driven or powered by main or auxiliary engines, power takeoff (PTO) shafts, or hydraulic pumps. The choice of pump depends on the material to be pumped and the capacity or volume needed. However, no particular type of pump is ideal for all purposes.
Sprayer pumps can be divided into two general categories: positive displacement and non-positive displacement. Positive displacement pumps (roller, diaphragm, and piston) maintain a flow output directly proportional to the pump speed. These pumps require a pressure-relief valve and a bypass line for proper performance. Non-positive displacement pumps do not have a proportional output flow to pump speed and do not require a relief valve and bypass line. The centrifugal pump is an example of a non-positive displacement pump style. A summary of common pump types and characteristics is found in the following Table (contributions from ACE Pumps Corporation, Hypro Pumps Inc., and CDS-John Blue Company).
Characteristic
Roller
Centrifugal
Diaphragm
Piston
Ground Driven Piston
Cost
Low
High
Medium
High
High
Displacement
Positive, self priming; Requires relief valve
Non-positive, needs priming; Relief valve not req’d
Positive, self-priming; Requires relief valve
Positive, self-priming; Requires relief valve
Positive, self-priming; Relief valve not reg’d. Runs off drive wheel and can be lifted on hydraulic-controlled applicators, or can be purchased with clutches to to disengage pump when flow is not desired.
Drive Mechanism
PTO, gas engines, electric motors
PTO, hydraulic drives, gas engines, electric motors
PTO, hydraulic drives, gas engines
PTO, gas engines, electric motors
Primarily ground-driven. Although less common, can be used with hydraulic drives, electric motors or gas engines.
Adaptability
Compact and versatile
Good for abrasive materials; Handles suspensions and slurries well.
Compact for amount of flow and pressure developed.
Wide range of spraying applications; Dependable
Wide range of spraying applications from clear liquids to suspensions. Very accurate regardless of ground speed or back pressure. Very dependable.
Durability
Parts to wear; replace
Very durable, not much wear
No corrosion of internal parts
Parts to wear; replace
Very durable. With basic care and maintenance, pumps can easily be in service 30 years or more.
Serviceability
Easy to work on, repair
Basic maintenance extends life
Low maintenance
Potential for high maintenance
Low maintenance
Pressure Range
up to 300 psi
up to 180 psi
up to 725 psi
up to 400 psi
up to 120 psi
Output Volume
2 to 74 gpm; high volumes for size; proportional to pump speed.
up to 190 gpm; High volumes for size and weight; Proportional to pump speed.
3.5 to 66 gpm; Proportional to pump speed.
up to 10 gpm; Proportional to pump speed, independent pressure.
0.5 gpm to 68.4 gpm.
Revolutions per minute
540, 1000
Requires speed-up mechanism. Very efficient at higher speeds; up to 6,000 rpm.
540
540
Ground-driven. Maximum 450 rpm.
Notes
Best choice by farmers.
If hydraulic-driven, no PTO required. Popular in commercial ag. applications. Running pump dry i s a problem.
Good for higher pressure requirements. Popular for horticultural applications. Pump can run dry.
Similar to an engine; Low capacity.
No gpa flow variation due to pressure or ground speed changes. No concern of electric failures on controllers or radar systems. Dependable accuracy.
Pump Efficiency
Regardless of the type of pump, the necessary flow rate must be provided at the desired pressure. Enough spray liquid should be pumped to supply the gallons per minute (gpm) required by the nozzles and the tank agitator, with a reserve capacity of 10 to 20 percent to allow for flow loss as the pump becomes worn. Unfortunately, pumps lose efficiency for a number of reasons, such as drive friction or leakage.
When estimating the pump horsepower needed for an application, efficiency (Eff) of 40 to 60 percent should be assumed. The horsepower (HP) required to drive the pump can be estimated by using the following formula:
HP = (gpm × psi) / (*1,714 × Eff) *Constant derived when converting gallons, minutes, pounds, and inches to horsepower.
Example: How much horsepower is required to run a pump if the maximum output is 50 gpm at 40 pounds per square inch (psi)? Assume a pump efficiency of 40 percent.
HP = (50 gpm × 40 psi) / (1,714 × 0.40 Eff) HP = 2.92
Because of inefficiencies of the drive units, electric motors should be approximately one third larger than the calculated horsepower. Gasoline engines should be one half to two thirds larger than the pump horsepower required. Ground-driven pumps that vary flow rates as ground speed changes are accurate and dependable; they are often used when applying high volumes of materials such as fertilizer.
Many pumps are PTO driven, but most modern spray pumps are hydraulic driven because of mounting versatility, ease of maintenance, and customization for individual sprayers. Charts are available to match pumps to various tractor hydraulic systems. You can access these charts by following the links to the following major pump manufacturers:
Proper pump size is an important consideration when selecting a sprayer pump. Requirements for nozzle capacity, hydraulic agitation, and overcoming the efficiency loss noted previously are essential points to consider. Nozzle capacity is determined by multiplying the number of nozzles on the boom times the output (gpm) of each nozzle for a specific application. Be sure to give consideration to the range of spray pressures that will be used for the given application. Agitation requirements typically account for another 5 percent of the sprayer tank capacity. Efficiency losses due to friction and pump wear may account for an additional 10 to 20 percent increase in the required flow rate. Spray pump manufacturers provide useful Web page worksheets to help determine pump sizes based on typical field application scenarios.
Manufacturers also make product guides available to help match sprayer pumps and hydraulic motors to the tractor’s hydraulic system (Table 2). A simple pump selection worksheet is provided at the end of this article.
No matter what type pump is used, it must be plumbed to route liquid from the pump to the spray boom with a minimum amount of restriction, a necessity for achieving the pump’s maximum rated capacity. The hoses should be the same size as the pump’s suction and discharge ports. Other recommendations include installing a pressure gauge and valve on the pressure side of the pump to measure the shut-off pressure and using a minimum number of elbows, fittings, and valves to reduce pressure losses.
Following these guidelines is necessary for delivering the highest pressures to the boom.
Pump Rotation
Pump rotation is critical for PTO and belt and- pulley driven pumps. The direction of rotation is always determined when facing the pump and drive shaft, and pumps are available in both clockwise and counter-clockwise rotation. Thus, when direct coupling shafts, the opposite rotation pump should always match the shaft. When mounting a pump with belts and pulleys, either pump rotation can be used to match the drive shaft rotation and the desired direction of the pump. Gasoline engine and electric motor shafts rotate in a counter-clockwise direction, and a tractor PTO shaft rotates in a clockwise direction.
Pump Types
Roller pumps are popular for small sprayers because of their low initial cost, compact size, ease of repair, and efficient operation at PTO speeds of 540 and 1000 revolutions per minute (rpm). Roller pumps are self-priming, positive displacement pumps, and a variety of models is available. Maximum outputs range from 2 to 75 gpm, and pressures range up to 300 psi.
Figure 1 – Roller Pump
Roller pumps are usually constructed with cast iron or corrosion resistant housings (non-symmetrical in shape), rotors, four to eight rollers (either nylon, Teflon, or rubber), and seals (Viton, rubber, or leather). The type of material selected depends on the chemical being pumped. A typical roller pump is shown in Figure 1.
Nylon or Teflon rollers are the most resistant to agricultural chemicals and are recommended for multipurpose sprayers. Rubber rollers are preferred when the pump is used only for water solutions and wettable powder slurries at pressures less than 100 psi. Because sand and scale are abrasive to the rollers, the solution being pumped must not contain these materials. Polypropylene rollers wear better than either nylon or rubber rollers when applying weak solutions or solutions with little or no lubricating qualities.
Some operators have experienced problems with excessive wear of the rollers, especially when using wettable powders. Other operators have achieved long pump life by allowing the pump to run continuously when spraying with wettable powders, and by properly maintaining and storing the pump, including keeping abrasive materials out of the sprayer. Specific seal, roller, and casting materials can be selected for compatibility with certain herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, and fertilizers Consideration should also be given to the adjuvants used in the spray solution.
Centrifugal pumps are the most popular type of low-pressure sprayer. They are durable, simply constructed, and can readily handle wettable powders and abrasive materials. Because of the high output of centrifugal pumps (70 to 190 gpm), the spray solution can be agitated sufficiently even in large tanks at pressures up to 180 psi. The initial cost of a centrifugal pump is somewhat higher than that of a roller pump, but its long life and low maintenance make it an economical choice. Pump housings of cast iron, stainless steel, and polypropylene are advantageous because they withstand strong chemicals. Stainless steel pumps are ideal for use with glyphosate or other acid applications. Polypropylene pumps are lightweight and provide excellent resistance to corrosive chemicals. Figure 2 shows a typical centrifugal pump.
Centrifugal Pump – Exploded View.
Because centrifugal pumps are not self-priming, they should be mounted below the supply tank to aid in priming. In addition, a small vent tube should be installed from the top of the pump housing to the supply tank. This positive vent line allows the pump to prime itself by “bleeding off” trapped air upon starting and when the pump is not operating.
The inlet of a centrifugal pump should never be restricted. A partially clogged suction strainer, collapsed suction line, or a suction line with insufficient capacity causes a loss of pressure control and possible damage to the pump. Centrifugal pumps can handle small pieces of foreign material without damage, so a suction strainer is not always required. If a suction strainer is used, however, it must be capable of handling the large capacities of the pump with a minimal drop in pressure across the strainer, and it must be cleaned frequently. Typical centrifugal pump plumbing would place the strainer on the pressure side of the pump.
Centrifugal pumps for low-pressure sprayers can generate pressures of up to 70 psi when the impellers are running between 3,000 and 4,500 rpm. The output volume drops off rapidly when the outlet pressure exceeds 30 to 40 psi. The decrease in volume is an advantage because the nozzle pressure is able to be controlled without a relief valve. See Figure 3 for a typical centrifugal pump performance curve. The pump performance curve describes the relationship between flow rate and pressure for the actual pump.
Figure 3 – Centrifugal Pump Performance Graph
The need to operate at high impeller speeds requires a type of step-up speed mechanism when operating centrifugal pumps from PTO shafts. The simplest and least expensive of these mechanisms is a belt and sheave assembly. Other step-up mechanisms have planetary gears that are completely enclosed and mounted directly on the PTO shaft.
Another method of driving a centrifugal pump is with a close coupled, high speed hydraulic motor. Using the tractor hydraulic system to drive the pump keeps the tractor PTO shaft free for other uses. It is essential to consult manufacturer pump selection guides to match the proper pump to your tractor. Pumps can also be driven by direct-coupled gasoline engines when other drive mechanisms cannot be used.
Airplane pumps may be wind-driven, directly powered from the aircraft engine, or powered by an electric or hydraulic motor. The pump may also power the tank agitation system. For fixed-wing aircraft, the most common type of pump is a wind-driven centrifugal pump mounted under the aircraft (Figure 4). The propeller slipstream drives a fan mounted on the front of the pump. Some fan-driven pumps have variable pitch blades that allow for changing pump speed, and thus output. The centrifugal pumps commonly used on aircraft produce high volumes (up to 200 gpm) at typically low pressure, usually ranging between 10 and 100 psi. These pumps usually require operating speeds from 1,000 to 5,000 rpm.
Figure 4 – Airplane Pump
Diaphragm pumps are popular when higher pressures are needed for applying foliar herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides. Models are available that provide maximum outputs ranging from 3.5 to 60 gpm and maximum pressures ranging from 200 to 700 psi. These pumps are extremely durable because all moving parts are sealed in an oil bath and spray solutions. Diaphragm pumps are self-priming and considered positive displacement pumps. Figure 5 shows a typical diaphragm pump. Smaller electric diaphragm pumps (Figure 6) are available for use by homeowners, ranchers, and hobbyists to apply pest control products. A good example is a spray system mounted on an ATV for spraying pastures and rights-of-way.
Figure 5 – Diaphragm Pump
Piston pumps are positive displacement pumps that are favored by many users for their priming ease, higher pressure capability, and constant volume spraying. Piston pumps are often used to apply crop protection products and fertilizers in combination with a ground drive so that flow rate stays proportional to ground speed and application rates remain constant. A pressure relief valve is required, though. Figure 7 is an example of a piston pump used to accurately meter liquid fertilizers.
Figure 7 – Piston Pump
Turbine pumps are also available for low‑pressure sprayers. A turbine pump consists of a rotating turbine within an enclosed housing. These pumps are similar to centrifugal pumps, except they provide higher flow capacity and pressures of up to 70 psi when mounted directly on a 1,000 rpm PTO shaft, eliminating the need for step‑up mechanisms. Because of the close tolerances between the turbine blades and the casing, turbine pumps are better adapted for clean fluids of low viscosity but may have difficulty with wettable powders and suspensions. Figure 8 shows a typical turbine pump.
Figure 8 – Turbine Pump
Gear pumps are positive displacement pumps capable of providing a smooth, low-volume, continuous flow of material. Gear pumps are typically two gears meshing together revolving in opposite directions within a casing. Abrasive materials such as wettable powders rapidly wear the gears and pump housing. Figure 9 shows a typical gear pump.
Figure 9 – Gear Pump
Squeeze pumps are low-pressure, positive displacement pumps with output proportional to speed. Pump flow is created when liquid is trapped by squeezing the hose between a roller and casing. Pump flow is determined by the size and number of hoses. This pump is ideally suited for metering small quantities of fertilizers or pesticides and would be practical for injection-type pumping systems. Figure 10 shows a typical squeeze pump.
Figure 10 – Squeeze Pump
Pump Maintenance
Proper pump maintenance is critical for maximum pump life. Regular cleaning is essential to removing all chemical residues and preventing wear to the pump from corrosive solutions. Do not allow spray solutions to remain in the sprayer for extended periods of time. Using lightweight antifreeze or a motor oil as the final spray solution after cleaning can preserve the pump during a period of non-use.
Pump Selection Worksheet
Acknowledgements
Excerpts for this article were adapted with permission from University of Illinois Circular 1192 developed by Loren Bode and Jack Butler (May 1981), Extension Agricultural Engineer and Professor of Agricultural Engineering, Univerity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Contributions for this article were also received from ACE Pumps Corporation; Hypro Pumps Inc.,; and CDS-John Blue Company.
For more information on pump selection, check out this article.
